Irrelevant since 1967.
- glove_was_stuck

didn't know you get to decide when cups are relevant. please let me know who gave you that privilege? common sense dictates that you look at a franchise and see how many cups they've won as a whole, but i guess when your franchise has only won 6 it's understandable why you think that way. OWNED AGAIN hahahaha

leafs have more than double the cups the bruins have, you're welcome bro
- sensnucksnocups

Rask

ahahaha i can't believe bruins fans were chirping leafs so long about the seguin trade and then they trade seguin for washed up eriksson and hamilton. a prospect D and mr.concussion for an elite young C/elite scoring winger.

bruins got OWNED hahahahahah
- sensnucksnocups

oh no... The Bruins have missed so many post season opportunities since then. Here let me help you:

play-off

noun
1.
(in competitive sports) the playing of an extra game, rounds, innings, etc., in order to settle a tie.
2.
a series of games or matches, as between the leading teams of two leagues, in order to decide a championship.

Oh yes what a painfu loss you got me. Ouch need some aloe for that sick burn





count how many stanley cups there are for me please? ahahahahahahha this is too easy.
- sensnucksnocups

wow

didn't know you get to decide when cups are relevant. please let me know who gave you that privilege? common sense dictates that you look at a franchise and see how many cups they've won as a whole, but i guess when your franchise has only won 6 it's understandable why you think that way. OWNED AGAIN hahahaha
- sensnucksnocups

All Stanley Cups are relevant to the franchise. Who could argue when that is the whole point of icing a team.

didn't know you get to decide when cups are relevant. please let me know who gave you that privilege? common sense dictates that you look at a franchise and see how many cups they've won as a whole, but i guess when your franchise has only won 6 it's understandable why you think that way. OWNED AGAIN hahahaha
- sensnucksnocups

Any mod's around? How is this guy still allowed to post here?

Any mod's around? How is this guy still allowed to post here?
- iknowbest

Guy is hysterical

didn't know you get to decide when cups are relevant. please let me know who gave you that privilege? common sense dictates that you look at a franchise and see how many cups they've won as a whole, but i guess when your franchise has only won 6 it's understandable why you think that way. OWNED AGAIN hahahaha
- sensnucksnocups

Let's see in 1967...you were not yet conceived(thank christ). You're all of 8 or 9 years old now. Irrelavant. You're celebrating championships that you didn't see or experience. You suck and your team sucks.

Any mod's around? How is this guy still allowed to post here?
- iknowbest

because i don't insult forum members, unlike all the trolls here who constantly bash me.

wow
- Cptmjl

#2, like his team and everything he does in life.



(that banner is a slightly painful. )

Rask
- Cptmjl

Raycroft

#2, like his team and everything he does in life.



(that banner is a slightly painful. )
- glove_was_stuck

Wow, that is still very impressive after all these years.

#2, like his team and everything he does in life.



(that banner is a slightly painful. )
- glove_was_stuck

Yeah. Sure that one makes you cringe a bit.

Raycroft
- glove_was_stuck

Exactly

Let's see in 1967...you were not yet conceived(thank christ). You're all of 8 or 9 years old now. Irrelavant. You're celebrating championships that you didn't see or experience. You suck and your team sucks.
- glove_was_stuck

so by your logic, and 8 or 9 year old would not have been alive for any cups won in the 80s or 90s correct? so i guess all those cups won by the oilers, red wings etc are now irrelevant? ahahahahah do you see how bad your reasoning is? what does the age of a person have anything to do with their franchise's success? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. nice try though, i'm sure you felt smart until i owned you again.


anyways i'm done posting for the day, its getting quite tiresome when i'm using facts to own you trolls and you guys just keep trolling with irrelevant comebacks and personal attacks.

so by your logic, and 8 or 9 year old would not have been alive for any cups won in the 80s or 90s correct? so i guess all those cups won by the oilers, red wings etc are now irrelevant? ahahahahah do you see how bad your reasoning is? what does the age of a person have anything to do with their franchise's success? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. nice try though, i'm sure you felt smart until i owned you again.


anyways i'm done posting for the day, its getting quite tiresome when i'm using facts to own you trolls and you guys just keep trolling with irrelevant comebacks and personal attacks.
- sensnucksnocups

So... By your logic the Islanders must be a far superior team to the Leafs due to them winning 4 cups since their existence and your team winning 0 in that same time span.

So... By your logic the Islanders must be a far superior team to the Leafs due to them winning 4 cups since their existence and your team winning 0 in that same time span.
- Cptmjl

so by your logic the new Las Vegas team will be just as successful as the habs, leafs, wings, oilers, isles, pretty much any team that has won multiple cups since they have won the same amount of cups since their existence as every other team.

god this is too easy. sorry i had to reply one last time since this troll loves the attention. remaining undefeated today once again, later trolls enjoy trolling.

Wow, that is still very impressive after all these years.
- Jeropotato

sure is

so by your logic the new Las Vegas team will be just as successful as the habs, leafs, wings, oilers, isles, pretty much any team that has won multiple cups since they have won the same amount of cups since their existence as every other team.

god this is too easy. sorry i had to reply one last time since this troll loves the attention. remaining undefeated today once again, later trolls enjoy trolling.
- sensnucksnocups

wow. I can't tell whether you're serious or not? I guess that's why I like you so much.

All Stanley Cups are relevant to the franchise. Who could argue when that is the whole point of icing a team.
- Jeropotato

Good point,

But the franchise might get irrelevant.

so by your logic, and 8 or 9 year old would not have been alive for any cups won in the 80s or 90s correct? so i guess all those cups won by the oilers, red wings etc are now irrelevant? ahahahahah do you see how bad your reasoning is? what does the age of a person have anything to do with their franchise's success? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. nice try though, i'm sure you felt smart until i owned you again.


anyways i'm done posting for the day, its getting quite tiresome when i'm using facts to own you trolls and you guys just keep trolling with irrelevant comebacks and personal attacks.
- sensnucksnocups

Nobody EVER argues the significance of the Leafs cup wins. The 13 or whatever Cups they have lend to the Leafs being one of the most storied Franchises in the history of the NHL.

Stanley Cups are not awarded to the Team that wins the most hockey trades.

Being a financial success makes you a success as a business.

Being a great, financially successful business with a storied History of success , and a history of winning some trades do not equate to being a good Team today.

Nobody EVER argues the significance of the Leafs cup wins. The 13 or whatever Cups they have lend to the Leafs being one of the most storied Franchises in the history of the NHL.

Stanley Cups are not awarded to the Team that wins the most hockey trades.

Being a financial success makes you a success as a business.

Being a great, financially successful business with a storied History of success , and a history of winning some trades do not equate to being a good Team today.
- Jeropotato

Though 4 decades and 7 years is a real long time.

Were you part of it ??
- Redmile247

Nobody EVER argues the significance of the Leafs cup wins. The 13 or whatever Cups they have lend to the Leafs being one of the most storied Franchises in the history of the NHL.

Stanley Cups are not awarded to the Team that wins the most hockey trades.

Being a financial success makes you a success as a business.

Being a great, financially successful business with a storied History of success , and a history of winning some trades do not equate to being a good Team today.
- Jeropotato

Agreed.

Everytime I see someone bragging about cups from the 60's I laugh.... I mean that's like bragging about your GF having a threesome before you met her ...it would have been cool to be a part of ...but you weren't so why the (frank) brag Bout it
- Redmile247

It has to be taken in context.
Much easier to win when there are 6 teams than 30.
Much easier to win when there is no draft.
Much easier to win without the salary cap.

Modern day accomplishments out weight the historical ones.
It's "what have you done lately" stuff that matters.