Dozzer
Referee Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high Joined: 09.15.2010
|
|
|
And who would you replace him with?
Vokoun is the only available guy with even comparable numbers, and he's coming off a life-threatening condition. - lumlums
give some 600 thousand dollar flunky the damn job |
|
PinkSock
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: https://nhl66.ir/ Joined: 07.23.2010
|
|
|
And who would you replace him with?
Vokoun is the only available guy with even comparable numbers, and he's coming off a life-threatening condition. - lumlums
maybe via UFA...there are other options |
|
senstroll
|
|
|
Location: Leafs AAV Champs, ON Joined: 02.22.2008
|
|
|
they do when they get top PP time
he also loses 20% of his ice time when you look at ES only.
also, getting a lot of ice time on the leafs of last season isnt exactly a "pro" argument - Dozzer
ok if 5v5 is your criteria, here are the top point producing D over the past 5 years
points per 60... he is #8 right between some pretty good players
http://stats.hockeyanalys...1&sort=HARTp&sortdir=DESC
Now I know the argument changes to he sucks defensively.
|
|
Woderwick
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: David Clarkson's Water Bottle, ON Joined: 02.12.2013
|
|
|
give some 600 thousand dollar flunky the damn job - Dozzer
I fit that criteria very well. |
|
Dozzer
Referee Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high Joined: 09.15.2010
|
|
|
ok if 5v5 is your criteria, here are the top point producing D over the past 5 years
points per 60... he is #8 right between some pretty good players
http://stats.hockeyanalys...1&sort=HARTp&sortdir=DESC
Now I know the argument changes to he sucks defensively. - senstroll
if you're defensive stats suck as bad as franson's i dont give a rats ass how many points he gets
big whoop.. he has a nice snap shot and gets lucky with his up ice passes sometimes. |
|
PinkSock
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: https://nhl66.ir/ Joined: 07.23.2010
|
|
|
Dozzer
Referee Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high Joined: 09.15.2010
|
|
|
I fit that criteria very well. - Woderwick
SOLD |
|
senstroll
|
|
|
Location: Leafs AAV Champs, ON Joined: 02.22.2008
|
|
|
if you're defensive stats suck as bad as franson's i dont give a rats ass how many points he gets
big whoop.. he has a nice snap shot and gets lucky with his up ice passes sometimes. - Dozzer
who has good defensive stats or is good defensively on the leafs? |
|
jimi james
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere Between, NB Joined: 07.17.2010
|
|
|
give some 600 thousand dollar flunky the damn job - Dozzer
we would but toskalas retired |
|
Dozzer
Referee Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high Joined: 09.15.2010
|
|
|
who has good defensive stats or is good defensively on the leafs? - senstroll
i am considering QoC here as well
can you imagine what phaneuf's defensive stats would be like playing against the guys franson does? or vice versa?
franson i would be fine with as a bottom pairing 2.5 million dollar guy who put up some numbers on the PP.
my issue is after this season the guy is going to be looking at 4.5-5 million per, long term. to which i say no thank you. |
|
ILoveLamp
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 02.01.2011
|
|
|
ok if 5v5 is your criteria, here are the top point producing D over the past 5 years
points per 60... he is #8 right between some pretty good players
http://stats.hockeyanalys...1&sort=HARTp&sortdir=DESC
Now I know the argument changes to he sucks defensively. - senstroll
Here's an easy argument
If Franson had 33 points last year and was -20, you have to account for his TRUE negative.
Say 1/3 of his points were on the PP. That means he should've been +22, but to end up as -20, he had to be on the ice for 42 more goals than his team scored.
If you subtract the 42 goals against, from his points, his offensive contribution is far less than his defensive liability. He's technically negative points |
|
senstroll
|
|
|
Location: Leafs AAV Champs, ON Joined: 02.22.2008
|
|
|
Dozzer
Referee Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high Joined: 09.15.2010
|
|
|
we would but toskalas retired - jimi james
hopefully 600 grand warrants an expectation to save a 200 foot shot |
|
MTL1
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Brampton, ON Joined: 06.30.2006
|
|
|
LeafMan
|
|
|
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven Joined: 05.20.2007
|
|
|
i am considering QoC here as well
can you imagine what phaneuf's defensive stats would be like playing against the guys franson does? or vice versa?
franson i would be fine with as a bottom pairing 2.5 million dollar guy who put up some numbers on the PP.
my issue is after this season the guy is going to be looking at 4.5-5 million per, long term. to which i say no thank you. - Dozzer
He will be UFA, so not to worry about that. |
|
djamon
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Victoria, BC Joined: 05.27.2013
|
|
|
give some 600 thousand dollar flunky the damn job - Dozzer
He better be ready to play 35 games with Bernier as the #1. |
|
senstroll
|
|
|
Location: Leafs AAV Champs, ON Joined: 02.22.2008
|
|
|
i am considering QoC here as well
can you imagine what phaneuf's defensive stats would be like playing against the guys franson does? or vice versa?
franson i would be fine with as a bottom pairing 2.5 million dollar guy who put up some numbers on the PP.
my issue is after this season the guy is going to be looking at 4.5-5 million per, long term. to which i say no thank you. - Dozzer
QoC is over stated..and not nearly as valuable as people think imo.
but I will play along... the difference is not much at all in the QoC.. Franson was not sheltered
if you say he was..you have to post some data to back that claim |
|
Dozzer
Referee Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high Joined: 09.15.2010
|
|
|
He better be ready to play 35 games with Bernier as the #1. - djamon
woderick you ready?
|
|
Woderwick
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: David Clarkson's Water Bottle, ON Joined: 02.12.2013
|
|
|
SOLD - Dozzer
Excellent. I just have to let you guys know, Woderwick isn't my real name. So when you see me backing up Bernier - you'll finally find out who I really am. |
|
Woderwick
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: David Clarkson's Water Bottle, ON Joined: 02.12.2013
|
|
|
woderick you ready? - Dozzer
I wasn't bargaining on this at all...I may have to rethink this. You do it...you're a goalie and everything. |
|
Dozzer
Referee Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high Joined: 09.15.2010
|
|
|
QoC is over stated..and not nearly as valuable as people think imo.
but I will play along... the difference is not much at all in the QoC.. Franson was not sheltered
if you say he was..you have to post some data to back that claim - senstroll
playing third pairing minutes with PP time isnt sheltered?
honestly i dont have time right now, but i think you can find it on behindthenet.ca
|
|
Dozzer
Referee Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high Joined: 09.15.2010
|
|
|
He better be ready to play 35 games with Bernier as the #1. - djamon
look at who the cup champ kings ran with as back ups all year
scrivens and some rookie kid
1A / 1B is over rated imo...
you pick your starter, and then go find your backup |
|
Dozzer
Referee Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high Joined: 09.15.2010
|
|
|
I wasn't bargaining on this at all...I may have to rethink this. You do it...you're a goalie and everything. - Woderwick
start me and i'll get the first overall in the leafs hands |
|
PinkSock
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: https://nhl66.ir/ Joined: 07.23.2010
|
|
|
nice,, you left it at 3000 minutes ..which he only played 2600+ in the past 3 years
solid
set it to 2500 and and he is 9th. - senstroll
Chris Butler played 3000 minutes...lots of guys did |
|
mcleafs
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 10.01.2013
|
|
|
Here's an easy argument
If Franson had 33 points last year and was -20, you have to account for his TRUE negative.
Say 1/3 of his points were on the PP. That means he should've been +22, but to end up as -20, he had to be on the ice for 42 more goals than his team scored.
If you subtract the 42 goals against, from his points, his offensive contribution is far less than his defensive liability. He's technically negative points - ILoveLamp
18 of his 33 points were from the PP.
So he scored or assisted on 15 goals ES. To get to -20, that means he was on the ice for 35 goals against compared to his contributions ES, or three times as much.
This number only gets worse when you realize the -20 is actually inflated due to the number of goals he was on the ice for in which he did not contribute to point-wise. |
|