Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: Leafs Avoid Arbitration, Sign Franson To One Year Deal
Author Message
Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:34 PM ET
And who would you replace him with?

Vokoun is the only available guy with even comparable numbers, and he's coming off a life-threatening condition.

- lumlums


give some 600 thousand dollar flunky the damn job
PinkSock
Montreal Canadiens
Location: https://nhl66.ir/
Joined: 07.23.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:34 PM ET
And who would you replace him with?

Vokoun is the only available guy with even comparable numbers, and he's coming off a life-threatening condition.

- lumlums

maybe via UFA...there are other options
senstroll
Location: Leafs AAV Champs, ON
Joined: 02.22.2008

Jul 21 @ 2:37 PM ET
they do when they get top PP time

he also loses 20% of his ice time when you look at ES only.

also, getting a lot of ice time on the leafs of last season isnt exactly a "pro" argument

- Dozzer



ok if 5v5 is your criteria, here are the top point producing D over the past 5 years
points per 60... he is #8 right between some pretty good players

http://stats.hockeyanalys...1&sort=HARTp&sortdir=DESC

Now I know the argument changes to he sucks defensively.

Woderwick
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: David Clarkson's Water Bottle, ON
Joined: 02.12.2013

Jul 21 @ 2:38 PM ET
give some 600 thousand dollar flunky the damn job
- Dozzer

I fit that criteria very well.
Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:39 PM ET
ok if 5v5 is your criteria, here are the top point producing D over the past 5 years
points per 60... he is #8 right between some pretty good players

http://stats.hockeyanalys...1&sort=HARTp&sortdir=DESC

Now I know the argument changes to he sucks defensively.

- senstroll


if you're defensive stats suck as bad as franson's i dont give a rats ass how many points he gets

big whoop.. he has a nice snap shot and gets lucky with his up ice passes sometimes.
PinkSock
Montreal Canadiens
Location: https://nhl66.ir/
Joined: 07.23.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:39 PM ET
ok if 5v5 is your criteria, here are the top point producing D over the past 5 years
points per 60... he is #8 right between some pretty good players

http://stats.hockeyanalys...1&sort=HARTp&sortdir=DESC

Now I know the argument changes to he sucks defensively.

- senstroll


Change it to last 3 yrs

http://stats.hockeyanalys...1&sort=HARTp&sortdir=DESC
Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:39 PM ET
I fit that criteria very well.
- Woderwick


SOLD
senstroll
Location: Leafs AAV Champs, ON
Joined: 02.22.2008

Jul 21 @ 2:40 PM ET
if you're defensive stats suck as bad as franson's i dont give a rats ass how many points he gets

big whoop.. he has a nice snap shot and gets lucky with his up ice passes sometimes.

- Dozzer



who has good defensive stats or is good defensively on the leafs?
jimi james
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere Between, NB
Joined: 07.17.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:42 PM ET
give some 600 thousand dollar flunky the damn job
- Dozzer

we would but toskalas retired
Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:42 PM ET
who has good defensive stats or is good defensively on the leafs?
- senstroll


i am considering QoC here as well

can you imagine what phaneuf's defensive stats would be like playing against the guys franson does? or vice versa?

franson i would be fine with as a bottom pairing 2.5 million dollar guy who put up some numbers on the PP.

my issue is after this season the guy is going to be looking at 4.5-5 million per, long term. to which i say no thank you.
ILoveLamp
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 02.01.2011

Jul 21 @ 2:42 PM ET
ok if 5v5 is your criteria, here are the top point producing D over the past 5 years
points per 60... he is #8 right between some pretty good players

http://stats.hockeyanalys...1&sort=HARTp&sortdir=DESC

Now I know the argument changes to he sucks defensively.

- senstroll



Here's an easy argument

If Franson had 33 points last year and was -20, you have to account for his TRUE negative.

Say 1/3 of his points were on the PP. That means he should've been +22, but to end up as -20, he had to be on the ice for 42 more goals than his team scored.

If you subtract the 42 goals against, from his points, his offensive contribution is far less than his defensive liability. He's technically negative points
senstroll
Location: Leafs AAV Champs, ON
Joined: 02.22.2008

Jul 21 @ 2:43 PM ET
Change it to last 3 yrs

http://stats.hockeyanalys...1&sort=HARTp&sortdir=DESC

- PinkSock



nice,, you left it at 3000 minutes ..which he only played 2600+ in the past 3 years

solid

set it to 2500 and and he is 9th.

Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:44 PM ET
we would but toskalas retired
- jimi james


hopefully 600 grand warrants an expectation to save a 200 foot shot
MTL1
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Brampton, ON
Joined: 06.30.2006

Jul 21 @ 2:44 PM ET
Change it to last 3 yrs

http://stats.hockeyanalys...1&sort=HARTp&sortdir=DESC

- PinkSock

http://stats.hockeyanalys...1&sort=HARTp&sortdir=DESC
Now change it to 4 years

Stats can been manipulated to suit any ones claims
LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

Jul 21 @ 2:44 PM ET
i am considering QoC here as well

can you imagine what phaneuf's defensive stats would be like playing against the guys franson does? or vice versa?

franson i would be fine with as a bottom pairing 2.5 million dollar guy who put up some numbers on the PP.

my issue is after this season the guy is going to be looking at 4.5-5 million per, long term. to which i say no thank you.

- Dozzer

He will be UFA, so not to worry about that.
djamon
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Victoria, BC
Joined: 05.27.2013

Jul 21 @ 2:44 PM ET
give some 600 thousand dollar flunky the damn job
- Dozzer


He better be ready to play 35 games with Bernier as the #1.
senstroll
Location: Leafs AAV Champs, ON
Joined: 02.22.2008

Jul 21 @ 2:45 PM ET
i am considering QoC here as well

can you imagine what phaneuf's defensive stats would be like playing against the guys franson does? or vice versa?

franson i would be fine with as a bottom pairing 2.5 million dollar guy who put up some numbers on the PP.

my issue is after this season the guy is going to be looking at 4.5-5 million per, long term. to which i say no thank you.

- Dozzer


QoC is over stated..and not nearly as valuable as people think imo.

but I will play along... the difference is not much at all in the QoC.. Franson was not sheltered

if you say he was..you have to post some data to back that claim
Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:46 PM ET
He better be ready to play 35 games with Bernier as the #1.
- djamon


woderick you ready?

Woderwick
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: David Clarkson's Water Bottle, ON
Joined: 02.12.2013

Jul 21 @ 2:47 PM ET
SOLD
- Dozzer

Excellent. I just have to let you guys know, Woderwick isn't my real name. So when you see me backing up Bernier - you'll finally find out who I really am.
Woderwick
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: David Clarkson's Water Bottle, ON
Joined: 02.12.2013

Jul 21 @ 2:48 PM ET
woderick you ready?
- Dozzer

I wasn't bargaining on this at all...I may have to rethink this. You do it...you're a goalie and everything.
Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:49 PM ET
QoC is over stated..and not nearly as valuable as people think imo.

but I will play along... the difference is not much at all in the QoC.. Franson was not sheltered

if you say he was..you have to post some data to back that claim

- senstroll


playing third pairing minutes with PP time isnt sheltered?

honestly i dont have time right now, but i think you can find it on behindthenet.ca

Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:51 PM ET
He better be ready to play 35 games with Bernier as the #1.
- djamon


look at who the cup champ kings ran with as back ups all year

scrivens and some rookie kid

1A / 1B is over rated imo...

you pick your starter, and then go find your backup
Dozzer
Referee
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow since I’m way up high
Joined: 09.15.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:52 PM ET
I wasn't bargaining on this at all...I may have to rethink this. You do it...you're a goalie and everything.
- Woderwick


start me and i'll get the first overall in the leafs hands
PinkSock
Montreal Canadiens
Location: https://nhl66.ir/
Joined: 07.23.2010

Jul 21 @ 2:53 PM ET
nice,, you left it at 3000 minutes ..which he only played 2600+ in the past 3 years

solid

set it to 2500 and and he is 9th.

- senstroll


Chris Butler played 3000 minutes...lots of guys did
mcleafs
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 10.01.2013

Jul 21 @ 2:53 PM ET
Here's an easy argument

If Franson had 33 points last year and was -20, you have to account for his TRUE negative.

Say 1/3 of his points were on the PP. That means he should've been +22, but to end up as -20, he had to be on the ice for 42 more goals than his team scored.

If you subtract the 42 goals against, from his points, his offensive contribution is far less than his defensive liability. He's technically negative points

- ILoveLamp

18 of his 33 points were from the PP.

So he scored or assisted on 15 goals ES. To get to -20, that means he was on the ice for 35 goals against compared to his contributions ES, or three times as much.

This number only gets worse when you realize the -20 is actually inflated due to the number of goals he was on the ice for in which he did not contribute to point-wise.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33  Next