Habsody
Montreal Canadiens |
|
Location: 3-Rivières, QC Joined: 12.16.2007
|
|
|
Meh, it'S Brian Burke.
TRUCULENCE!!!! - Pecafan Fan
Hiller, Raymond and Engelland |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
Pour la troisième fois en autant d'occasions en 2014, la Québécoise Eugenie Bouchard s'est qualifiée pour le carré d'as d'un tournoi majeur en défaisant l'Allemande Angelique Kerber en deux manches, 6-3 et 6-4, mercredi, à Wimbledon.
Bouchard est devenue seulement la sixième joueuse de l'histoire du circuit WTA à atteindre les demi-finales des trois premiers tournois du Grand chelem d'une même année.
Elle rencontrera en demi-finales la Roumaine Simona Halep, troisième favorite de la compétition, qui a facilement vaincu Sabine Lisicki, 19e tête de série, 6-4 et 6-0.
Peu importe le résultat du prochain match, Bouchard est assurée de grimper au huitième rang mondial, elle qui détient actuellement la 13e position.
- Pea-Brain
Wow! I didn't realize she would grimpe so much!! That's fabulous. |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: Gardez-le votre ANGLAIS, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
There were a few...but yeah... if that guy has shown one thing, it's that he CAN'T be counted on to show up...
So where does he end up? A team that has consistently shown that they don't show up to play every night (and don't seem to have a clue what the (frank) they are doing out on the ice).
P.S. who's nickname is 'cakes'??? - number_23
Sekac = cakes |
|
Habsody
Montreal Canadiens |
|
Location: 3-Rivières, QC Joined: 12.16.2007
|
|
|
what was it again? 5.5? 6.0? per year
- number_23
Yeah 5.5 |
|
AGalchenyuk27
Dallas Stars |
|
|
Location: He was responsible for the term “Gordie Howe hat trick”, where a player scored a goal, added an , NB Joined: 02.05.2013
|
|
|
There were a few...but yeah... if that guy has shown one thing, it's that he CAN'T be counted on to show up...
So where does he end up? A team that has consistently shown that they don't show up to play every night (and don't seem to have a clue what the (frank) they are doing out on the ice).
P.S. who's nickname is 'cakes'??? - number_23
Jiri "Mae West" Sekac |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: Gardez-le votre ANGLAIS, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme Joined: 01.20.2009
|
|
|
It's not even about Pouliot's personality.
how does he fit the bill in Edmonton? Don't they already have a bunch of underachieving, offensive-first, soft forwards already? |
|
number_23
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Euuuuh, un porc-épic? Joined: 10.15.2008
|
|
|
number_23
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Euuuuh, un porc-épic? Joined: 10.15.2008
|
|
|
It's not even about Pouliot's personality.
how does he fit the bill in Edmonton? Don't they already have a bunch of underachieving, offensive-first, soft forwards already? - Pecafan Fan
They know their teams' identity... |
|
Not_Yan
St Louis Blues |
|
|
Location: it's an excellent product, easier, quicker, and even better than real mashed potatoes. Joined: 04.19.2013
|
|
|
Wait...
Are we putting Sekac on the starting lineup projected lines already? |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: Gardez-le votre ANGLAIS, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
Wait...
Are we putting Sekac on the starting lineup projected lines already? - Not_Yan
Yup...
|
|
BashCH
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: The legendary Don Cherry agrees with me..., QC Joined: 04.27.2010
|
|
|
Wait...
Are we putting Sekac on the starting lineup projected lines already? - Not_Yan
Engels already added him to his 20 goal scorers list for next year. |
|
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme Joined: 01.20.2009
|
|
|
Wait...
Are we putting Sekac on the starting lineup projected lines already? - Not_Yan
YES!!!!!! |
|
Habsody
Montreal Canadiens |
|
Location: 3-Rivières, QC Joined: 12.16.2007
|
|
|
Wait...
Are we putting Sekac on the starting lineup projected lines already? - Not_Yan
Yes he will form a great duo with Plekanec which he never played with! Ace of spade of yesterday. |
|
Habsody
Montreal Canadiens |
|
Location: 3-Rivières, QC Joined: 12.16.2007
|
|
|
Engels already added him to his 20 goal scorers list for next year. - BashCH
|
|
|
|
Hiller, Raymond and Engelland - Habsody
I don't think any Canadian team had a strong day yesterday.
Jets are going to get destroyed in their division now.
Calgary and Edmonton....well....
Montreal in Toronto both probably got a little weaker.
Vancouver? Not sure the reasoning behind Miller. I guess maybe they are stronger. |
|
Not_Yan
St Louis Blues |
|
|
Location: it's an excellent product, easier, quicker, and even better than real mashed potatoes. Joined: 04.19.2013
|
|
|
I don't think any Canadian team had a strong day yesterday.
Jets are going to get destroyed in their division now.
Calgary and Edmonton....well....
Montreal in Toronto both probably got a little weaker.
Vancouver? Not sure the reasoning behind Miller. I guess maybe they are stronger. - stormeyweather
Same here. |
|
hscesq
Referee Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Our debt is easily solvable considering the assets owned by the province. QP, NY Joined: 06.26.2007
|
|
|
I don't think any Canadian team had a strong day yesterday.
Jets are going to get destroyed in their division now.
Calgary and Edmonton....well....
Montreal in Toronto both probably got a little weaker.
Vancouver? Not sure the reasoning behind Miller. I guess maybe they are stronger. - stormeyweather
Interesting take. Totally inaccurate as far as Montreal goes, but that's your usual nonsense. The Leafs definitely got weaker - an amazing feat, by an awesome GM!!! |
|
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme Joined: 01.20.2009
|
|
|
I don't think any Canadian team had a strong day yesterday.
Jets are going to get destroyed in their division now.
Calgary and Edmonton....well....
Montreal in Toronto both probably got a little weaker.
Vancouver? Not sure the reasoning behind Miller. I guess maybe they are stronger. - stormeyweather
Montreal got better defensively and bigger up front.
They have a little less scoring, but they have plenty of cap space so they could make some moves in order to help that. |
|
|
|
Montreal got better defensively and bigger up front.
They have a little less scoring, but they have plenty of cap space so they could make some moves in order to help that. - Pecafan Fan
?? |
|
Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme Joined: 01.20.2009
|
|
|
?? - stormeyweather
They got rid of Gorges. |
|
number_23
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Euuuuh, un porc-épic? Joined: 10.15.2008
|
|
|
I don't think any Canadian team had a strong day yesterday.
Jets are going to get destroyed in their division now.
Calgary and Edmonton....well....
Montreal in Toronto both probably got a little weaker.
Vancouver? Not sure the reasoning behind Miller. I guess maybe they are stronger. - stormeyweather
Weaker because of their moves? or weaker because others improved?
I don't see how the habs are weaker...I think the moves they made improved them. |
|
AGalchenyuk27
Dallas Stars |
|
|
Location: He was responsible for the term “Gordie Howe hat trick”, where a player scored a goal, added an , NB Joined: 02.05.2013
|
|
|
Engels already added him to his 20 goal scorers list for next year. - BashCH
|
|
number_23
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Euuuuh, un porc-épic? Joined: 10.15.2008
|
|
|
Interesting take. Totally inaccurate as far as Montreal goes, but that's your usual nonsense. The Leafs definitely got weaker - an amazing feat, by an awesome GM!!! - hscesq
|
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136 Next |