oh there's a brilliant (frank)ing analysis
- DoubleDown

Well all this talk of montreal.s vaunted depth is laughable tbh .

Well all this talk of montreal.s vaunted depth is laughable tbh .

- top shelf 15

Pls tell us why it's laughable.

The logical argument is that Montreal is done if they can't win game three.

Montreal was done at 11am yesterday morning.

No, no it is not laugh material.

Depth will win this series and if PK can play a little defense.

Pls tell us why it's laughable.
- hscesq

Because emoticons are readily available

Because emoticons are readily available
- Cape Breton Bruins

they sure do strengthen an argument. worked for BIG all those years.

Well all this talk of montreal.s vaunted depth is laughable tbh .

- top shelf 15

4 teams left, genius

4 teams left, genius
- deadpoulet

HABS SUCK LOOOOL!!!!!!

4 teams left, genius
- deadpoulet

Ha Ha...enjoy your crappy draft pick.

Pls tell us why it's laughable.
- hscesq

Montreal is a decent team dont misunderstand .But they arent unbeatable ,there are plenty of teams that had close to or arguble better depth than montreal,and are now out of the picture.

Ha Ha...enjoy your crappy draft pick.
- StormCloud

LUCIC 2.0

Gloom and doom

No worries my Habs friends.

Habs in 6. Rag$ do not have the depth to match us.
- Toady_Toast

Lol.

Gloom and doom

No worries my Habs friends.

Habs in 6. Rag$ do not have the depth to match us.
- Toady_Toast

This was the post i was refering too,depth doesnt mean a damned thing if you lose one of the best goalies in the game

LUCIC 2.0
- EssuieToutJeune

Quizz:


What's this?

2 0 0 0 -1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0

Montreal is a decent team dont misunderstand .But they arent unbeatable ,there are plenty of teams that had close to or arguble better depth than montreal,and are now out of the picture.
- top shelf 15

I see. Well, I can't argue with this.

This was the post i was refering too,depth doesnt mean a damned thing if you lose one of the best goalies in the game

- top shelf 15

so you're telling us that if a team cannot replace its best player, they have no depth. ok.

McCarron. Wanted the Rangers to draft him.
- tomburton99

0 shots on goal in 2 games.

i'm sure we'll trade him to you for Brad Richards in a year or two

0 shots on goal in 2 games.
- Pecafan Fan

He's on London now right?

Well all this talk of montreal.s vaunted depth is laughable tbh .

- top shelf 15

says the guy who wants his team to run after Benoit (frank)ing Pouliot this summer.

i'm sure we'll trade him to you for Brad Richards in a year or two
- DoubleDown

Mark Bergevin is smarter than that. Plus, the only way Richards ends up on the Habs is via UFA.

He's on London now right?
- tomburton99

Yup.

Doesn't seem to be doing too well so far in the CHL.

I see. Well, I can't argue with this.
- hscesq

If San Jose ,a pretty deep team in its own right cant win with a guy like mediocre yet somewhat experienced goalie in Neimi .I just dont see a team like montreal being able to do it with a pretty inexperienced guy in Tokarski.

If San Jose ,a pretty deep team in its own right cant win with a guy like mediocre yet somewhat experienced goalie in Neimi .I just dont see a team like montreal being able to do it with a pretty inexperienced guy in Tokarski.
- top shelf 15

That's your opinion. You're entitled to it. It's wrong, but you're still entitled to it.

If San Jose ,a pretty deep team in its own right cant win with a guy like mediocre yet somewhat experienced goalie in Neimi .I just dont see a team like montreal being able to do it with a pretty inexperienced guy in Tokarski.
- top shelf 15

You need to be a little funnier in your trolls.