dt99999
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim Joined: 11.18.2008
|
|
|
hunglikeapuck
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Punta Cana Joined: 07.14.2009
|
|
|
EssuieToutJeune
Nashville Predators |
|
|
Location: See, what actually happens is just one of many probabilities and one of the biggest weaknessesblabla Joined: 03.01.2013
|
|
|
habs12
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Cole Harbour, NS Joined: 04.29.2008
|
|
|
The name Bertuzzi probably means "A-Hole" in old Italian - stinger67
He has Marchand like tendencies |
|
tomburton99
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: NYR distrust, NJ Joined: 07.13.2009
|
|
|
Boo Nieves.
His real name was Cristoval, but he chose Boo because it was less embarrassing. - AdamFrench
Supposedly he stinks, so he can rot in the AHL with Mcilrath. |
|
DrRecchi
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Currently being entertained by the asian lady mowing 8 inch grass with an electric mower Joined: 06.29.2011
|
|
|
Was really hoping you wouldn't. - AdamFrench
|
|
rob121
Montreal Canadiens |
|
Location: montreal Joined: 12.08.2006
|
|
|
Eric Engels: Habs Can't Solve Lundqvist. Vanek Ghosting through the ECF - EricEngels
I don't understand why everyone is piling on vanek. he was fantastic once he got comfortable with pacioretty and desharnais. playoffs roll around and that line gets a steady dose of chara and bergeron and is shut down. coach mikey decides to spread the wealth and sticks vanek on a line with plekanec and gionta both of whom have sucked offensively all playoffs long. so now, vanek who had all kinds of chemistry with pacioretty and desharnais is on a line with a centre who disappears come playoff time and everyone is piling on vanek? fans in montreal get sucked in to media b.s. and just follow the leader and don't see the big picture. therrien should put vanek back with desharnais and pacioretty. eller should play with gallagher and galchenyuk. plekanec and gionta can play with bourque and briere should play with weise and prust. wtf. is that so hard to understand? (frank)ing wankers. |
|
Crimsoninja
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Dude, I am so sorry about whatever made you like this. Take it easy. Joined: 07.06.2007
|
|
|
I don't understand why everyone is piling on vanek. he was fantastic once he got comfortable with pacioretty and desharnais. playoffs roll around and that line gets a steady dose of chara and bergeron and is shut down. coach mikey decides to spread the wealth and sticks vanek on a line with plekanec and gionta both of whom have sucked offensively all playoffs long. so now, vanek who had all kinds of chemistry with pacioretty and desharnais is on a line with a centre who disappears come playoff time and everyone is piling on vanek? fans in montreal get sucked in to media b.s. and just follow the leader and don't see the big picture. therrien should put vanek back with desharnais and pacioretty. eller should play with gallagher and galchenyuk. plekanec and gionta can play with bourque and briere should play with weise and prust. wtf. is that so hard to understand? (frank)ing wankers. - rob121
GHOSTING |
|
Jean_Perron
|
|
|
Location: Fleurimont, Québec Joined: 08.03.2012
|
|
|
@Etienne_Pouliot Ah, pourquoi les sushis? Il n'y a pas d'explication à vrai dire, j'imaginais Michel en sushi-man |
|
Jean_Perron
|
|
|
Location: Fleurimont, Québec Joined: 08.03.2012
|
|
|
- bluewaffle
|
|
Crimsoninja
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Dude, I am so sorry about whatever made you like this. Take it easy. Joined: 07.06.2007
|
|
|
- Jean_Perron
lahey's the best |
|
Jean_Perron
|
|
|
Location: Fleurimont, Québec Joined: 08.03.2012
|
|
|
, same bar with the Canada vs USA olympic bet. - weirdoh
Looks like it yeah, these guys are awesome |
|
AGalchenyuk27
Dallas Stars |
|
|
Location: He was responsible for the term “Gordie Howe hat trick”, where a player scored a goal, added an , NB Joined: 02.05.2013
|
|
|
lahey's the best - Crimsoninja
has he left HB forever? |
|
Jean_Perron
|
|
|
Location: Fleurimont, Québec Joined: 08.03.2012
|
|
|
Hard to believe Hovart went 9th overall. He sucked on team Canada, and now he sucks at the memorial cup. Haven't seen anything special about this kid so far. - ShafterBenRaide
He's not a flashy player, but he's very smart. |
|
AGalchenyuk27
Dallas Stars |
|
|
Location: He was responsible for the term “Gordie Howe hat trick”, where a player scored a goal, added an , NB Joined: 02.05.2013
|
|
|
Jean_Perron
|
|
|
Location: Fleurimont, Québec Joined: 08.03.2012
|
|
|
bluewaffle
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Hennywhere but here! Joined: 07.07.2012
|
|
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: taking the low road Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
2-2 - AGalchenyuk27
5-2, cue Rag fans trolling the Kings thread. |
|
Jean_Perron
|
|
|
Location: Fleurimont, Québec Joined: 08.03.2012
|
|
|
tomburton99
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: NYR distrust, NJ Joined: 07.13.2009
|
|
|
5-2, cue Rag fans trolling the Kings thread. - Pie
You mean the Hawks thread? And the idots who do that are just that. Idiots. |
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: taking the low road Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
You mean the Hawks thread? And the idots who do that are just that. Idiots. - tomburton99
I mean the LA thread now that they won a game, and ya I agree. |
|
tomburton99
New York Rangers |
|
|
Location: NYR distrust, NJ Joined: 07.13.2009
|
|
|
I mean the LA thread now that they won a game, and ya I agree. - Pie
Pretty hard to troll a thread when the team won 5-2. |
|
Pie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: taking the low road Joined: 10.14.2006
|
|
|
Pretty hard to troll a thread when the team won 5-2. - tomburton99
I would have thought the same about Chi as well, especially since the ECF isn't over, as much as it seems it should be. |
|
AGalchenyuk27
Dallas Stars |
|
|
Location: He was responsible for the term “Gordie Howe hat trick”, where a player scored a goal, added an , NB Joined: 02.05.2013
|
|
|
AGalchenyuk27
Dallas Stars |
|
|
Location: He was responsible for the term “Gordie Howe hat trick”, where a player scored a goal, added an , NB Joined: 02.05.2013
|
|
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103 Next |