i think he wouldn't give a poop because he signed his contract at 22 while Vanek is 30. i understand your point but you make it seem like Moulson will cost $3 million or something. you're still talking about a big contract to a 30-year-old forward that comes with risk. i'll take the riskier contract that comes with higher potential rewards.
- DoubleDown

Well said.

I doubt Moulson wants 7 years at 7+...

As for reward ? I'm quite sure both players would provide similar numbers for the Habs

Now you're comparing Vanek and Clarkson? Oh boy. Ok, I'll accept Moulson as the comparison, because you're getting worse.
- hscesq

Tu es courageux. Je déteste la SST.
- Fredobbface

relatif à mon travail, et je sais pas pour combien de temps mon boss va encore garder sa compagnie...je veux me doter d'outils pour m'ouvrir quelques portes.

They play the wing and both would play on our first line.

They also score goals.

Different styles maybe.. but at the end of the day, both players would provide offense and size to the Habs.
- WaterBoy

Different styles maybe? Size? T'es completement fou toi?

Good god.

They play the wing and both would play on our first line.

They also score goals.

Different styles maybe.. but at the end of the day, both players would provide offense and size to the Habs.
- WaterBoy

IMHO, Moulson is a bad fit because his game is too similar to Pacioretty. We need complementary scorers. Vanek's combination of hit-pass-goal last night was really something.

Vanek will be traded to the team he wants to sign with, for a draft pick.

That is all.
- pete26

This is not possible.

IMHO, Moulson is a bad fit because his game is too similar to Pacioretty. We need complementary scorers. Vanek's combination of hit-pass-goal last night was really something.
- Not_Yan

Will you be my bride?

Will you be my bride?
- hscesq

Sure!

Vanek is more important than Markov. Need to re-sign him for sure.

relatif à mon travail, et je sais pas pour combien de temps mon boss va encore garder sa compagnie...je veux me doter d'outils pour m'ouvrir quelques portes.
- stinger67

Different styles maybe? Size? T'es completement fou toi?

Good god.
- hscesq

Moulson's 6'1

would be a giant with this team.

Sure!
- Not_Yan

Yesssss!!

IMHO, Moulson is a bad fit because his game is too similar to Pacioretty. We need complementary scorers. Vanek's combination of hit-pass-goal last night was really something.
- Not_Yan

His hit on Kronwall was kind of an obstruction, both were racing for the puck but a good 5-6 feet away.

Great hockey play and great pass to DD after

IMHO, Moulson is a bad fit because his game is too similar to Pacioretty. We need complementary scorers. Vanek's combination of hit-pass-goal last night was really something.
- Not_Yan

just shows you how little offensive talent we have on this team when a guy like Vanek comes in here and we're all poopting ourselves. he's not even a top-10 forward.

Moulson's 6'1

would be a giant with this team.
- WaterBoy

I'm not saying he isn't tall Marty. But he doesn't play a big game.

- TouenneTiiTree

"Si j'veux pas m'retrouver à visser des boulons à la GM!"

Vanek is more important than Markov. Need to re-sign him for sure.
- BingoLady

Markov was excellent last night (again).

IMHO, Moulson is a bad fit because his game is too similar to Pacioretty. We need complementary scorers. Vanek's combination of hit-pass-goal last night was really something.
- Not_Yan

Maybe he could compliment PLek's wing ?

His hit on Kronwall was kind of an obstruction, both were racing for the puck but a good 5-6 feet away.

Great hockey play and great pass to DD after
- Fredobbface

that guy... 46 points in like 52 games or something.
that contract looks a bit different than it did in November. though this is a big playoff for him.

just shows you how little offensive talent we have on this team when a guy like Vanek comes in here and we're all poopting ourselves. he's not even a top-10 forward.
- DoubleDown

Shut up.

just shows you how little offensive talent we have on this team when a guy like Vanek comes in here and we're all poopting ourselves. he's not even a top-10 forward.
- DoubleDown

No but he is a legit 1st liner and that 2nd line of Pleks and the kids looks good so far

that guy... 46 points in like 52 games or something.
that contract looks a bit different than it did in November. though this is a big playoff for him.
- DoubleDown

very

just shows you how little offensive talent we have on this team when a guy like Vanek comes in here and we're all poopting ourselves. he's not even a top-10 forward.
- DoubleDown

He makes up for the missed opportunities. Hey, a guy like Andrew Ladd was UFA at some point, and was signed by WINNIPEG.

I'm not saying he isn't tall Marty. But he doesn't play a big game.
- hscesq

HE's not a banger... he's no Clarkson...

Does Vanek play a big game ? Nope.

If this team can sign Vanek, Moulson or any other forward taller than Briere, MB will be doing something right.

Shut up.
- hscesq

can always tell when you agree with me