Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Eklund: Beware of the Trap Game
Author Message
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:14 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:14 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:14 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:14 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:14 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:15 AM ET
I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:16 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:16 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:16 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:16 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:16 AM ET
I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers
Location: Phila, PA
Joined: 02.20.2012

Mar 19 @ 8:16 AM ET
I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers
Joined: 07.20.2011

Mar 19 @ 8:50 AM ET
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play?
- Girouxy

can you please post this again? I didn't understand it the first 60 times
faceto27
Location: Burke: Best part of today is I
Joined: 01.21.2010

Mar 19 @ 8:54 AM ET
can you please post this again? I didn't understand it the first 60 times
- Flyfreaky


Fatman......... we miss you in Leafs land.

Come back


Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next