Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Girouxy
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
Location: Phila, PA Joined: 02.20.2012
|
|
|
I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? |
|
Flyfreaky
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Joined: 07.20.2011
|
|
|
Top teams make sense, but to the anonymous players point, who are the more dangerous teams? The higher teams in the standings or the hungry players who want to continue to work next year? I think its a bad idea to "hope" "wish" or anything for your opponent. No teams are easy to beat. If wins were garanteed, why play? - Girouxy
can you please post this again? I didn't understand it the first 60 times |
|
faceto27
|
|
|
Location: Burke: Best part of today is I Joined: 01.21.2010
|
|
|
can you please post this again? I didn't understand it the first 60 times - Flyfreaky
Fatman......... we miss you in Leafs land.
Come back
|
|