No thanks. I'm fine with him not coming back even if he drops his demands down to a couple bucks.
- Cptmjl

agreed...its not the money im worried about for moulson; the money is there and then some if need be...its that i dont think hes worth a spot on the roster...his negatives outweigh the positives.

agreed...its not the money im worried about for moulson; the money is there and then some if need be...its that i dont think hes worth a spot on the roster...his negatives outweigh the positives.
- LetsGoIsles

Yep. I'm certainly satisfied to be rid of him

Eh...funny how anyone who plays with JT has chemistry. Same with Crosby, Getzlaf etc....
- keaner17

Spot on.

Ah...a two game sample! That should do it.

Of course why they'd put Pyatt on anything other than a 4th line....
- keaner17

Because, somehow, he was the best option.

My point is, you can't take a journeyman/4th liner and play them and have them succeed. You at least need a legit top-6 player to play with them for any sort of success.

Eh...funny how anyone who plays with JT has chemistry. Same with Crosby, Getzlaf etc....
- keaner17

So back to my point...are you saying JT and MM did not have chemistry...cause they certainly did. yes JT and Sid make guys play better but MM complimented JT and his game...just because the guy got moved you forget how well they played together..really...I think some guys just like to put down what others write on here for no other reason but to get a reaction ...so proceed I suppose, we know you will.

Had a nearly identical point output to PA the previous year...CHEMISTRY
- keaner17

PAP carried the inexperienced Tavares that season


XxNYIxX

So back to my point...are you saying JT and MM did not have chemistry...cause they certainly did. yes JT and Sid make guys play better but MM complimented JT and his game...just because the guy got moved you forget how well they played together..really...I think some guys just like to put down what others write on here for no other reason but to get a reaction ...so proceed I suppose, we know you will.
- Nolanders

And JT showed chemistry with PA, boyes, Vanek, okposo, etc. What's the one consistent thing here?

And JT showed chemistry with PA, boyes, Vanek, okposo, etc. What's the one consistent thing here?
- Isles_since_6

OMG...duh...not once did I not give JT the credit, but MM was a nice compliment to his game..they had chemistry. he was a guy tat cleaned up in front of the net..they should have left him with the isles...his 2 goals tonight would have been nice on our side eh....now I'll wait for another genius to tell me how great JT is and how he makes players better....I KNOW THIS...try hard now and stay focused

OMG...duh...not once did I not give JT the credit, but MM was a nice compliment to his game..they had chemistry. he was a guy tat cleaned up in front of the net..they should have left him with the isles...his 2 goals tonight would have been nice on our side eh....now I'll wait for another genius to tell me how great JT is and how he makes players better....I KNOW THIS...try hard now and stay focused
- Nolanders

You are so dense. Jt creates chemistry with his linemates. Moulson needed him, jt didn't need Moulson.