which ones?
- Fountain-San

Okay will use 9-11 for instance. A lot of people don't believe it because of two major occurrences. They way the two towers fell and building 7 collapse.

Tower 1 and tower 2 were both built out from a central structural support (the elevators and the concrete around them) both instances a plane hit from the side taking out structural supports on one side of the building. If you have ever watch shows on demoing building they spend a lot of time planning where the detonations devices are placed and what order they are set off so that the building will collapse into itself and not over. In both instances the towers start to collapse you can see the middle of the tower and the antennas give way before the the building collapses. The plane hit approx 12 floors down from the top of the buildings but the top collapses first and starts the free fall. We now have two towers that were built to be able to resist the kinds of accidents ( it wasn't done right apparently). Now back to my point of how people spend their lives learning how to properly demolish building with explosives to properly insure they fall right (into and on top of themselves) if the timing is off the building will top off to one side, very easy occurrence to happen. Now with tower 1 and 2 after being hit on the side of the building both collapsed in perfect free fall directly on top of itself with no leaning over. A perfect demolish of itself basically. This is a 101 story building this is dam near impossible for 1 of them to do it for two of them to do it can't happen.

has nothing to do with any of that. i credit our front office since Chiarelli and Neely were hired.

you might want to take a more critical look at the jackasses that run your team.
- Fountain-San

stop this

has nothing to do with any of that. i credit our front office since Chiarelli and Neely were hired.

you might want to take a more critical look at the jackasses that run your team.
- Fountain-San

Really?! Coming from a team that gave up on 3, top-5 picks in Kessel, Seguin, and Thornton only to watch them be awesome elsewhere whilst not really getting a whole hell of alot in return as whole???

Take a room FFS.

I wish
- dt99999

This explains it all:

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=442918

Really?! Coming from a team that gave up on 3, top-5 picks in Kessel, Seguin, and Thornton only to watch them be awesome elsewhere whilst not really getting a whole hell of alot in return as whole???

- Not_Stee

Twit.

This explains it all:

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=442918
- hscesq

Kerry Fraser is an idiot.

Kerry Fraser is an idiot.
- stinger67

I agree

This explains it all:

http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=442918
- hscesq

meh.

Twit.
- hscesq

My bad... as a whole.

Okay will use 9-11 for instance. A lot of people don't believe it because of two major occurrences. They way the two towers fell and building 7 collapse.

Tower 1 and tower 2 were both built out from a central structural support (the elevators and the concrete around them) both instances a plane hit from the side taking out structural supports on one side of the building. If you have ever watch shows on demoing building they spend a lot of time planning where the detonations devices are placed and what order they are set off so that the building will collapse into itself and not over. In both instances the towers start to collapse you can see the middle of the tower and the antennas give way before the the building collapses. The plane hit approx 12 floors down from the top of the buildings but the top collapses first and starts the free fall. We now have two towers that were built to be able to resist the kinds of accidents ( it wasn't done right apparently). Now back to my point of how people spend their lives learning how to properly demolish building with explosives to properly insure they fall right (into and on top of themselves) if the timing is off the building will top off to one side, very easy occurrence to happen. Now with tower 1 and 2 after being hit on the side of the building both collapsed in perfect free fall directly on top of itself with no leaning over. A perfect demolish of itself basically. This is a 101 story building this is dam near impossible for 1 of them to do it for two of them to do it can't happen.
- Yeti1181

i could post a lengthy counter argument.

the Bush administration did not pull that off.

meh.
- dt99999

True.

Kerry Fraser is an idiot.
- stinger67

He's not all wrong though. Gallagher has to be smarter. I do think that last hit by Trouba was a penalty but after all the other nonsense I don't blame the ref for turning a blind eye to it.

Okay will use 9-11 for instance. A lot of people don't believe it because of two major occurrences. They way the two towers fell and building 7 collapse.

Tower 1 and tower 2 were both built out from a central structural support (the elevators and the concrete around them) both instances a plane hit from the side taking out structural supports on one side of the building. If you have ever watch shows on demoing building they spend a lot of time planning where the detonations devices are placed and what order they are set off so that the building will collapse into itself and not over. In both instances the towers start to collapse you can see the middle of the tower and the antennas give way before the the building collapses. The plane hit approx 12 floors down from the top of the buildings but the top collapses first and starts the free fall. We now have two towers that were built to be able to resist the kinds of accidents ( it wasn't done right apparently). Now back to my point of how people spend their lives learning how to properly demolish building with explosives to properly insure they fall right (into and on top of themselves) if the timing is off the building will top off to one side, very easy occurrence to happen. Now with tower 1 and 2 after being hit on the side of the building both collapsed in perfect free fall directly on top of itself with no leaning over. A perfect demolish of itself basically. This is a 101 story building this is dam near impossible for 1 of them to do it for two of them to do it can't happen.
- Yeti1181

go on



*leaves*

Okay will use 9-11 for instance. A lot of people don't believe it because of two major occurrences. They way the two towers fell and building 7 collapse.

Tower 1 and tower 2 were both built out from a central structural support (the elevators and the concrete around them) both instances a plane hit from the side taking out structural supports on one side of the building. If you have ever watch shows on demoing building they spend a lot of time planning where the detonations devices are placed and what order they are set off so that the building will collapse into itself and not over. In both instances the towers start to collapse you can see the middle of the tower and the antennas give way before the the building collapses. The plane hit approx 12 floors down from the top of the buildings but the top collapses first and starts the free fall. We now have two towers that were built to be able to resist the kinds of accidents ( it wasn't done right apparently). Now back to my point of how people spend their lives learning how to properly demolish building with explosives to properly insure they fall right (into and on top of themselves) if the timing is off the building will top off to one side, very easy occurrence to happen. Now with tower 1 and 2 after being hit on the side of the building both collapsed in perfect free fall directly on top of itself with no leaning over. A perfect demolish of itself basically. This is a 101 story building this is dam near impossible for 1 of them to do it for two of them to do it can't happen.
- Yeti1181

have we been to the moon?

Really?! Coming from a team that gave up on 3, top-5 picks in Kessel, Seguin, and Thornton only to watch them be awesome elsewhere whilst not really getting a whole hell of alot in return as whole???

- Not_Stee

whatever you say, bud.

i could post a lengthy counter argument.

the Bush administration did not pull that off.
- Fountain-San

*delays departure*

please do


*leaves*

Okay will use 9-11 for instance. A lot of people don't believe it because of two major occurrences. They way the two towers fell and building 7 collapse.

Tower 1 and tower 2 were both built out from a central structural support (the elevators and the concrete around them) both instances a plane hit from the side taking out structural supports on one side of the building. If you have ever watch shows on demoing building they spend a lot of time planning where the detonations devices are placed and what order they are set off so that the building will collapse into itself and not over. In both instances the towers start to collapse you can see the middle of the tower and the antennas give way before the the building collapses. The plane hit approx 12 floors down from the top of the buildings but the top collapses first and starts the free fall. We now have two towers that were built to be able to resist the kinds of accidents ( it wasn't done right apparently). Now back to my point of how people spend their lives learning how to properly demolish building with explosives to properly insure they fall right (into and on top of themselves) if the timing is off the building will top off to one side, very easy occurrence to happen. Now with tower 1 and 2 after being hit on the side of the building both collapsed in perfect free fall directly on top of itself with no leaning over. A perfect demolish of itself basically. This is a 101 story building this is dam near impossible for 1 of them to do it for two of them to do it can't happen.
- Yeti1181

I see your wife made you watch zeighgeist on netflix

meh.
- dt99999

yup, the way that PP is operating I doubt it would have been a difference maker. Daniel Briere trying to stand in front of the net and 5 other guys standing around the perimeter...yeesh.

*delays departure*

please do


*leaves*
- dt99999

nah. i would be annoyed if hab's posted in the Bruins threads all the time.

(that was a lie, i'd enjoy it)

He's not all wrong though. Gallagher has to be smarter. I do think that last hit by Trouba was a penalty but after all the other nonsense I don't blame the ref for turning a blind eye to it.
- Pie

He really embellished the crosscheck behind the head he received, or the repetitive shove in the face by Montoya.

I understand Fraser, he just want to protect his friends, but that was (frank)ing ridiculous.

He really embellished the crosscheck behind the head he received, or the repetitive shove in the face by Montoya.

I understand Fraser, he just want to protect his friends, but that was (frank)ing ridiculous.
- stinger67

hockey plays

whatever you say, bud.
- Fountain-San

It's so cute that you think your team is legit and the real deal...

At least I can acknowledge mine is a cluster(frank) and a brainfart of epic proportions.

Ostee sti ta yeule

I see your wife made you watch zeighgeist on netflix
- Biggus Richardus

I checked it out....it's pretty hit and miss.