he'd likely get more

his rookie season was back in the day of clutch and grab hockey

mogilny was an all time great.. yak has a long ways to go to prove he even deserved to be talked about with him in the same sentence.

i am sorry.. but its true.
- Dozzer

His rookie season was 89-90.

he'd likely get more

his rookie season was back in the day of clutch and grab hockey

mogilny was an all time great.. yak has a long ways to go to prove he even deserved to be talked about with him in the same sentence.

i am sorry.. but its true.
- Dozzer

You're overstepping a bit here.

http://www.hockeydb.com/i...ats/pdisplay.php?pid=3762

He had one spectacular season and a few very good ones.

Undeniable talent, but his body kept breaking down.

All-time great?

Nope. That's too far.

Never in his career...ever. So BUNK.


As to the idea of their careers, four seasons, I added the extra one which had Kulemin's ridiculous skewed 30 goal year, because Clarkson's 30 goal skewed year is identical in their one timeliness. Clarkson saw PP time with Kovalchuk, Zajac, Elias, (frank)ing Parise, so good on him for producing, good on Kulemin when he had his chances too.

Kulemin is better than Clarkson and it will suck when we lose him for this overpaid icon because he can defend the sanctity of waterbottles with his mouth since his fists were occupied grabbing his cash piles at the time.
- AdamFrench

So, how do you really feel about Clarkson ?

so include Clarkson's one good season but don't include Kulemin's one good season.....seems fair lol
- BlowMonkey

That's why I went back to 10-11.

No it wasn't. His 76 goal season was the highest scoring season in NHL history.
- mykokes

Was just going to point at that clutch and grab didnt really gain prominence until mid-late 90s.

Incarcerated Bob IBN ‏@incarceratedbob 1m
**BREAKING NHL RUMOR**Source: Kulikov rumors heating up again #Panthers want 3 pieces (2 NHL ready players + Pick) Leafs/Stars most interest
Expand


- burn

Looks like Incoherent Bob caught the Kulikov goal on TV last night.

So, how do you really feel about Clarkson ?
- bixll

Great third liner, could be play a very important part on a contender.

Not even close my friend. Teamu did the 76 thing as a rookie. 99 had 92 one year.
- bixll

I believe he meant the 92-93 season was the highest scoring year in NHL history

Was just going to point at that clutch and grab didnt really gain prominence until mid-late 90s.
- sanfordnson

(frank)ing Devils

You're overstepping a bit here.

http://www.hockeydb.com/i...ats/pdisplay.php?pid=3762

He had one spectacular season and a few very good ones.

Undeniable talent, but his body kept breaking down.

All-time great?

Nope. That's too far.
- Atomic Wedgie

He was one of the most talented players of any era, he should have been better, but he didn't take hockey serious enough. He'll admit that.

Never in his career...ever. So BUNK.


As to the idea of their careers, four seasons, I added the extra one which had Kulemin's ridiculous skewed 30 goal year, because Clarkson's 30 goal skewed year is identical in their one timeliness. Clarkson saw PP time with Kovalchuk, Zajac, Elias, (frank)ing Parise, so good on him for producing, good on Kulemin when he had his chances too.

Kulemin is better than Clarkson and it will suck when we lose him for this overpaid icon because he can defend the sanctity of waterbottles with his mouth since his fists were occupied grabbing his cash piles at the time.
- AdamFrench

bang on.

I believe he meant the 92-93 season was the highest scoring year in NHL history
- ky678468

Thank you.

Poor fraser

Great third liner, could be play a very important part on a contender.
- AdamFrench

BUt, really... He is way over paid. WAY. OVER.

He's going to be 20 this year. He's clearly hit his peak already. They really should trade him. Centers are overrated anyways.
- sanfordnson

Your a complete idiot. If you don't know hockey then don't comment. Your embarrassing your self

Poor fraser
- Leafland

I'm sure he's ok with this... Likely get more playing time now!

Was just going to point at that clutch and grab didnt really gain prominence until mid-late 90s.
- sanfordnson

The year after the first lockout pretty much. I blame Eric Lindros. When he came into the league, big slow d-men with big sticks became en vogue. God knows small d-men couldn't stop him.

Never in his career...ever. So BUNK.


As to the idea of their careers, four seasons, I added the extra one which had Kulemin's ridiculous skewed 30 goal year, because Clarkson's 30 goal skewed year is identical in their one timeliness. Clarkson saw PP time with Kovalchuk, Zajac, Elias, (frank)ing Parise, so good on him for producing, good on Kulemin when he had his chances too.

Kulemin is better than Clarkson and it will suck when we lose him for this overpaid icon because he can defend the sanctity of waterbottles with his mouth since his fists were occupied grabbing his cash piles at the time.
- AdamFrench

Been a long time since I disagreed with an opinion that was so flawed, wrong and completely deplorable. Good effort though. Loved the way you changed my arguement about recent seasons and rolled with something more convenient.

Thank you.
- mykokes

My Bad..

Your a complete idiot. If you don't know hockey then don't comment. Your embarrassing your self
- langer420

Not very friendly

Been a long time since I disagreed with an opinion that was so flawed, wrong and completely deplorable. Good effort though.
- systemtool

Thank you friend.

I believe he meant the 92-93 season was the highest scoring year in NHL history
- ky678468

And, Go MOOSE.

Not very friendly
- robin_steele264

Somebody had to say it to that insufferable drama queen...just glad it wasn't me, the guy benches 350 and wears a tap-out t-shirt.

Didn't you know he's an ethnic Tatar!? He'd rather have his limbs pulled from his torso by horses than ever play in the KHL
- 1979AD

Sometimes you just gotta love Hockeybuzz.

Almost as good as the argument last night from Cooshie: since 1990, the Sabres have been a better franchise than the Oilers.

Sadly, he didn't really say much when it was pointed out to him that the Oilers had a pretty good 1990.

Your a complete idiot. If you don't know hockey then don't comment. Your embarrassing your self
- langer420

What the hell is this??