I maintain that that top line needs to stay together. Bulk up the rest of the lines and use Yakupov if you REALLY need to trade one of the youngens for a Dman.

reasons why i stay out of the leaf threads.
- deks1

He's been spreading his seeds of wisdom all over Ek's thread lately, too. Only a matter of time before he comes visiting us now that a few of us have engaged him.

reasons why i stay out of the leaf threads.
- deks1

still not as retarded as those cannuckleheads

still not as retarded as those cannuckleheads
- nagasadow

I don't often say good things about the Nucks thread (unless it's Nucker, of course), but no, the Leafs thread is WAY worse.

Rookie mistake unfortunately and then a perfectly placed shot.
- MaximumBone

No,that shot should have been stop.

Kadri+Gardiner+Franson+1st+ For Ganger+Yakupov+Petry?

Kadri+Gardiner+Franson+1st+ For Ganger+Yakupov+Petry?
- BoTtLePoLiCe

Hmm interesting

Hmm interesting
- AlEx_OiL

Lol justa thought...I am really bored and just wanted to know if TOR would need more or less or what...?

I maintain that that top line needs to stay together. Bulk up the rest of the lines and use Yakupov if you REALLY need to trade one of the youngens for a Dman.
- MaximumBone

Good call. Plenty of resources to use without getting rid of the top line. Gagner and the pick would should be tempting to almost any team in the league.

No,that shot should have been stop.
- AlEx_OiL

I don't fully agree. It was one of those right below the glove right above the pad shots that are one of the harder shots to stop. I'd obviously like him to save that, but I won't call it a "bad" goal.

Kadri+Gardiner+Franson+1st+ For Ganger+Yakupov+Petry?
- BoTtLePoLiCe

Nope nope and nope. Last thing we need is another pick. I still like Ganger better than Kadri. The d are interesting. Franson and Gardiner for Gagner and our 1st pick makes more sence on this end.

Kadri+Gardiner+Franson+1st+ For Ganger+Yakupov+Petry?
- BoTtLePoLiCe

Pretty close I'd say. I don't see the Leafs doing it, but not because of a lack of value. Moreso because I think they need D.

I'd say he's worse. In my encounters with Newmy, he's at least backed down/accepted his mistake when I present him with facts that disprove his theorys. He also isn't stupid, just annoying. This new guy seems to legitimately believe he's the sh!t and he comes up with the most ridiculous trade proposals (Yakupov(+) for Franson is a beauty of his) and massive biases.
- MaximumBone

Check out his latest in Eks thread...

Someone put Gene out of his misery?

Pretty close I'd say. I don't see the Leafs doing it, but not because of a lack of value. Moreso because I think they need D.
- MaximumBone

I don't know...then the Leafs could go
Phan9 - Rielly
Brennan - Petry
Gunnar - Gleason

Nope nope and nope. Last thing we need is another pick. I still like Ganger better than Kadri. The d are interesting. Franson and Gardiner for Gagner and our 1st pick makes more sence on this end.
- JuiceMcT83

Let's say that we take that deal; we could then turn around and shop two firsts for either a #1 goalie, dman or a big forward. Wouldn't be the end of the world.

Let's say that we take that deal; we could then turn around and shop two firsts for either a #1 goalie, dman or a big forward. Wouldn't be the end of the world.
- nated81

Cool. Have your people call my people and we can get this thing done lol.

Cool. Have your people call my people and we can get this thing done lol.
- JuiceMcT83

Hold on, I'm on the other line with MacT.

Hold on, I'm on the other line with MacT.
- nated81

I'm a pretty big fan of Bolland as well. But i can't see the Leafs being realistic on his price.

I'm a pretty big fan of Bolland as well. But i can't see the Leafs being realistic on his price.
- JuiceMcT83

Isn't he a UFA this summer?

Isn't he a UFA this summer?
- nated81

Not too sure but taht would bring his price down. While i see why people would trade Gags, no one seems to have a suggestion as to who will centre the second line without him. Bolland would be a good fit as he is more gritty better in the dot and has some exp.

I don't know...then the Leafs could go
Phan9 - Rielly
Brennan - Petry
Gunnar - Gleason
- BoTtLePoLiCe

No offense, but that's almost as bad as the current Oilers blueline. Rielly is NOT ready for top pairing duty, Brennan has massive holes in his defensive game, and Gleason is declining.

Check out his latest in Eks thread...
- Iggysbff

Dear God. And someone's actually defending him Isn't BuffaloHardHat the guy who said Vanek was more capable of "taking over games" than Datsyuk?

Not too sure but taht would bring his price down. While i see why people would trade Gags, no one seems to have a suggestion as to who will centre the second line without him. Bolland would be a good fit as he is more gritty better in the dot and has some exp.
- JuiceMcT83

Just checked, he is a UFA this summer. I'm not sure if he would make that good of a 2nd line center but would be great as a 3rd. We need a big, strong guy as our #2 center. Bolland is 6' 180ish lbs.

still not as retarded as those cannuckleheads
- nagasadow

I don't know about that. Between djamon, daddyischronic, and systemtool I don't think they make it to triple digits in IQ points combined