Perhaps I should have checked my trade requests before accepting yours on here

Sorry bud
- vancity787

For a supposedly rebuilding team, Lefty just gave up a lot of futures.

Those picks could be good players.

I think if a player gets called up and loses "NA" status it's like when a player is activate from "IR"—you can still leave that player in the NA/IR spot, but if you try to make any roster drops/adds while that player is still in the spot, you'll get a "roster error," and it won't let you add/drop until you rectify the problem.

Also, if you leave the player there for too long after he is no longer NA/IR (can't remember how long, or even if this still happens), you'll get a "roster error" when you try to dress a lineup.

So it does force you to activate or drop the player eventually, but you have time to decide.
- Fosco

Oh Okay, didn't realize Yahoo had an actual NA spot, thought you were just gonna enforce that rule manually. I'm on board I guess, but I wouldn't like being forced to drop 4 or 5 players this year that aren't prospects for 4 or 5 NA spots, I prefer flexibility but that's just me of course.

For a supposedly rebuilding team, Lefty just gave up a lot of futures.

Those picks could be good players.
- Fosco

I'm old, the only thing that matters is now

I'm old, the only thing that matters is now
- LeftCoaster

I'm old, the only thing that matters is now
- LeftCoaster

Interested in moving Ryan Johannson

Note to the Calgary Flames I should be your new GM. My team has officially exploded for draft picks

Interested in moving Ryan Johannson
- Bieksa#3

No idea who that is but if he's moving Ryan Johansen I' be interested.

Note to the Calgary Flames I should be your new GM. My team has officially exploded for draft picks
- vancity787

Oh Okay, didn't realize Yahoo had an actual NA spot, thought you were just gonna enforce that rule manually. I'm on board I guess, but I wouldn't like being forced to drop 4 or 5 players this year that aren't prospects for 4 or 5 NA spots, I prefer flexibility but that's just me of course.
- Nucker101

I agree.

I'm willing to maybe drop one bench spot, if that's what everyone else wants, but we discussed this before the season started (at least those who decided to participate) and decided that we wanted the flexibility of a deep bench.

No idea who that is but if he's moving Ryan Johansen I' be interested.
- Nucker101

Todays a great day. Breaking bads on and Im stocking up a fukk load of draft picks for next year..

Those and some form of a Nobel prize as well. He'll be speaking about it at his New Years address to the Assembly at the United Nations next week.
- Marwood

Wow, I say, Wow

I'm old, the only thing that matters is now
- LeftCoaster

I agree.

I'm willing to maybe drop one bench spot, if that's what everyone else wants, but we discussed this before the season started (at least those who decided to participate) and decided that we wanted the flexibility of a deep bench.
- Fosco

I say bigger bench

Todays a great day. Breaking bads on and Im stocking up a fukk load of draft picks for next year..
- vancity787

God damn, you're gonna be the new Oilers!

Scooby is going to loose his mind!

Scooby is going to loose his mind!
- Chest Rockwell

God damn, you're gonna be the new Oilers!
- Nucker101

BLASPHEMY

Scooby is going to loose his mind!
- Chest Rockwell

Scooby is going to loose his mind!
- Chest Rockwell

Only one that's really eyebrow raising is the Spezza deal.

- Nucker101

Our match up this week just got a whole lot more interesting

Only one that's really eyebrow raising is the Spezza deal.
- Fosco

Agreed

Agreed
- Bieksa#3

I would have offered much better, but ya snooze ya loose, I guess...

Only one that's really eyebrow raising is the Spezza deal.
- Fosco

Yeah, that one is a little loopsided.

Only one that's really eyebrow raising is the Spezza deal.
- Fosco

Shyt!!!! Nucker, I sent you a message in that deal that said "c'mon you can do better than that" and accidentally pressed agree. If you have a heart Youd delete the trade!

Fukk!!!!