the rangers worst contract for beaulieu?
- hugefemale dog77

Ok Nash has scored 30 goals every year except for his rookie year an one other season on a way worse team and had 21 last year 40 twice he is a much more dynamic player and for the age difference and cap I still wouldn't trade Nash straight up for Pacioretty.
- blizzzard

Pacioretty has played ONE full NHL season. and he scored 33 goals.

Ugh, these trade proposals are embarrassing.

nash isn't going anywhere unless the rangers send this season the way of the buffalo (not a knock on sabres fans). so unless the rangers tear this thing down brick by brick, nash isn't going to MTL for draft picks and trading him for Subban would be pointlessly sacrificing offense for defense. but hey, sather is still pulling the strings. maybe he'll trade nash for a box of Cuban cigars.

Ugh, these trade proposals are embarrassing.
- razr

Eklund knows how to make crap

Eklund knows how to make crap
- Prusthemust

No, I'm talking about the proposals that Habs fans have been making in this thread. Doesn't speak well of us.

Ugh, these trade proposals are embarrassing.
- razr

agreed,

pacioretty for nash? laughable.

nash isn't going anywhere unless the rangers send this season the way of the buffalo (not a knock on sabres fans). so unless the rangers tear this thing down brick by brick, nash isn't going to MTL for draft picks and trading him for Subban would be pointlessly sacrificing offense for defense. but hey, sather is still pulling the strings. maybe he'll trade nash for a box of Cuban cigars.
- Why So Serious

you're saying... you wouldn't trade Nash for Subban?

agreed,

pacioretty for nash? laughable. no way the rangers do this

ugh
- hugefemale dog77

i don't see why either team would do it. solves nothing for either team.

Isnt that what happens when the Habs deal with the Rags?
- poohcrumbs

ummm, what????? No. Other way around. the Rangers dump their trash, like Gomez, on the Habs, for great pieces. Sather may not be great at signings, but he kills it in trading.

So nothing new even though you said there would be.

So glad I'm not a season ticket holder.

agreed,

pacioretty for nash? laughable.
- hugefemale dog77

I agree. The adorable thing is, you think you're being antagonistic. Better still, I'm sure you think Subban for Yakupov is totally reasonable.

I agree. The adorable thing is, you think you're being antagonistic. Better still, I'm sure you think Subban for Yakupov is totally reasonable.

EDIT: Oh you're an Oilers fan from Vancouver? You must kill at parties.
- razr

easy pumpkin.

gathering from the demeanour of your response, and then subsequent return to edit and post more; I'm sure you're not even welcome at social gatherings.

again; I don't think the rangers are interested in pacs for nash. cause nash is better.

you're saying... you wouldn't trade Nash for Subban?
- scotch_tape

i like subban and would love him on the rangers (especially because he can bomb the puck from the point), but trading the only scoring threat on a team with an anemic offense? no way. i'd rather them take a shot at Byufglien.

i like subban and would love him on the rangers (especially because he can bomb the puck from the point), but trading the only scoring threat on a team with an anemic offense? no way. i'd rather them take a shot at Byufglien.
- Why So Serious

Cancer in the room too. You really want that around?

Cancer in the room too. You really want that around?
- prock

talking about buff? i wouldn't know. i haven't stepped foot in an NHL locker room.

and what's with the re edit and erase??


was it an attack of conscience and a never ending struggle to contain your proclivity towards being a total dbag??

and what's with the re edit and erase??


was it an attack of conscience and a never ending struggle to contain your proclivity towards being a total dbag??
- hugefemale dog77

hahaha, you do realize that more than half the people that post here are;

a) unemployed, barely educated

B) employed, post here while at work = work ethic and morals are minimal

C) are cowards, and have way to much time on their hands to talk trash

D) are under 25 ( not everyone under that age are douchy, but anyone born after 1990 to me are (frank)ing useless for the most part)

E) Fill in the blank and continue on to F


to me if the rangers are going to deal with the habs, habs are looking for size and scoring, not Def, rangers are looking for scoring but responsible 2 way play and a few prospect to fill the cupboards. Personally i think nash to mtl could be plausible, but i think it would be more for Boyle or maybe just a pure hockey trade. a couple struggling stars that need new starts somewhere else, both teams have a few of said players.

i know we will never know what was said or agreed upon behind close dorrs when the habs gave mcdonnagh away for free, but maybe the habs have a; " you owe us one" with the rangers, in the spirit of making a trade. obviously a trade that makes sense for both teams, but hopefully a little bit more in the habs favor.

Bourque, Beaulieu + pick for MDZ?

I didn't follow Rangers much this year and I know MDZ is having a bad year so far, so excuse me if the deal way off. Just testing water here

Wow some of these trade offers.

Mcdonagh, nash, kreider, and lundqvist are all untouchable.

Pacioretty for nash? Patches is a great player but nowhere near nash. Nash was close to a ppg player last year and has been playing well this season despite a slow few games after coming back from injury. Nash is a top 5 right wing, maybe top 3, in the entire nhl. Any deal for nash would be patches + gallagher + prospect + 1st.

Mcdonagh I wouldn't trade straight up for subban let alone him and Kreider.

you're saying... you wouldn't trade Nash for Subban?
- scotch_tape

No. Nash is literally our only scoring winger and is a bonafide superstar. Subban is great but theres no way the rangers trade their best forward.

Im not saying the value isn't fair, it just doesn't make sense.

Wow some of these trade offers.

Mcdonagh, nash, kreider, and lundqvist are all untouchable.

Pacioretty for nash? Patches is a great player but nowhere near nash. Nash was close to a ppg player last year and has been playing well this season despite a slow few games after coming back from injury. Nash is a top 5 right wing, maybe top 3, in the entire nhl. Any deal for nash would be patches + gallagher + prospect + 1st.

Mcdonagh I wouldn't trade straight up for subban let alone him and Kreider.
- rangerdanger94

I think you undervalue some players....

Wow some of these trade offers.

Mcdonagh, nash, kreider, and lundqvist are all untouchable.

Pacioretty for nash? Patches is a great player but nowhere near nash. Nash was close to a ppg player last year and has been playing well this season despite a slow few games after coming back from injury. Nash is a top 5 right wing, maybe top 3, in the entire nhl. Any deal for nash would be patches + gallagher + prospect + 1st.

Mcdonagh I wouldn't trade straight up for subban let alone him and Kreider.
- rangerdanger94

I agree on some of that, but come on, Nash is not worth Patches + Gallagher + prospect + 1st.

You didn't even give that much to get him in the first place. Dubinsky, Anisimov, Erixon + 1st. Patches > Dubinsky (by a big margin IMO), Gallagher > Anisimov and prospect could very well be equal to Erixon.

I love Nash, but you are under evaluating Patches big time.

I agree on some of that, but come on, Nash is not worth Patches + Gallagher + prospect + 1st.

You didn't even give that much to get him in the first place. Dubinsky, Anisimov, Erixon + 1st. Patches > Dubinsky (by a big margin IMO), Gallagher > Anisimov and prospect could very well be equal to Erixon.

I love Nash, but you are under evaluating Patches big time.
- Frank0721

I love patches too and would trade stepan + mdz for him and a pick probably. But nash is a 1st overall player and there are only a handful of guys like him in the league. I understand its an overpayment for you guys, but I think its what it would take for sather to say yes. Columbus got a bad return because.nash had a nmc and wanted to only come to ny. He's worth a lot more than wjat we got him for, and we still gave up a lot. 2 top 6 forwards, our best prospect, and a 1st rounder.

I think you undervalue some players....
- Prusthemust

I love patches but I dont think he can do the stuff nash does on the ice in his dreams even. Patches is on a bobby ryan level and nash is on corey perry's

As for subban and mcdonagh...fair trade but mcdonagh might be a top 5 defender in terms of shutting guys down and is our only consistent defenseman this season. Not to mention his AMAZING contract, which adds a ton of value. Subban is probably looking for 7 or 8 mil a year.