Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: Kadri Will Not Play vs. San Jose
Author Message
RogerRoeper
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 03.27.2007

Dec 3 @ 5:57 PM ET
if you're bringing in Liles, you need Ranger. Sit Gardiner.
You can have your hate, but Ranger is much more stable in his own end than Gardiner.
Gardiner-Rielly is a bad idea if it's not a PP.

- UsernameUnknown




bobbyisno1
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I'm excited to see that
Joined: 08.28.2010

Dec 3 @ 5:57 PM ET
If thats the plan that would be dumb.
- aminnes

its been the plan all year, let the goalie absorb 40 plus shots a game
RogerRoeper
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 03.27.2007

Dec 3 @ 5:58 PM ET
its been the plan all year, let the goalie absorb 40 plus shots a game
- bobbyisno1


I think the shake-up should be firing the coach.
aminnes
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mrs. Buzzkill, AB
Joined: 12.17.2008

Dec 3 @ 5:59 PM ET
its been the plan all year, let the goalie absorb 40 plus shots a game
- bobbyisno1


Oh i see what you meant
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 11.30.2009

Dec 3 @ 5:59 PM ET
I think the shake-up should be firing the coach.
- RogerRoeper


Lolzzzzzzzz
RogerRoeper
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 03.27.2007

Dec 3 @ 6:00 PM ET
Lolzzzzzzzz
- Garnie


He's been terrible.
Arctic_AARDVARK
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Retired, ON
Joined: 07.24.2011

Dec 3 @ 6:00 PM ET
its been the plan all year, let the goalie absorb 40 plus shots a game
- bobbyisno1



Sounds like a solid game plan.
aminnes
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mrs. Buzzkill, AB
Joined: 12.17.2008

Dec 3 @ 6:00 PM ET
I think the shake-up should be firing the coach.
- RogerRoeper


Firing RC wont make the d better, they simply arent very good, and way too much cap has been allocated to the forwards.
Arctic_AARDVARK
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Retired, ON
Joined: 07.24.2011

Dec 3 @ 6:01 PM ET
He's been terrible.
- RogerRoeper

He needs to be better at yelling
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 11.30.2009

Dec 3 @ 6:01 PM ET
He's been terrible.
- RogerRoeper


Every times he's put on his skates you mean ?
Arctic_AARDVARK
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Retired, ON
Joined: 07.24.2011

Dec 3 @ 6:01 PM ET
Firing RC wont make the d better, they simply arent very good, and way too much cap has been allocated to the forwards.
- aminnes

Bozak.
RogerRoeper
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 03.27.2007

Dec 3 @ 6:02 PM ET
Firing RC wont make the d better, they simply arent very good, and way too much cap has been allocated to the forwards.
- aminnes


Yes, firing Randy can improve team defense.

There was a time when the Leafs were bottom 5 under Burke but had the most expensive defense corps.
bobbyisno1
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I'm excited to see that
Joined: 08.28.2010

Dec 3 @ 6:02 PM ET
Firing RC wont make the d better, they simply arent very good, and way too much cap has been allocated to the forwards.
- aminnes

but a different system might make the D look better, and a new coach would bring that
markmark
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 07.27.2010

Dec 3 @ 6:02 PM ET
He needs to be better at yelling
- Arctic_AARDVARK


Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 11.30.2009

Dec 3 @ 6:03 PM ET
Firing RC wont make the d better, they simply arent very good, and way too much cap has been allocated to the forwards.
- aminnes


We will be fine. Just need to make the playoffs.

It's 82 games - need to slump so we can make trades or practice, plus some of our best players have missed time.

Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 11.30.2009

Dec 3 @ 6:03 PM ET
Yes, firing Randy can improve team defense.

There was a time when the Leafs were bottom 5 under Burke but had the most expensive defense corps.

- RogerRoeper


No, our D sucks. That's ALL on Nonis.
aminnes
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mrs. Buzzkill, AB
Joined: 12.17.2008

Dec 3 @ 6:03 PM ET
Yes, firing Randy can improve team defense.

There was a time when the Leafs were bottom 5 under Burke but had the most expensive defense corps.

- RogerRoeper


RC has already used several styles if you are paying attention, and spending the money willy-nilly isnt the answer, they need to use the money wisely still.
RogerRoeper
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 03.27.2007

Dec 3 @ 6:03 PM ET
We will be fine. Just need to make the playoffs.

It's 82 games - need to slump so we can make trades or practice, plus some of our best players have missed time.

- Garnie


The Leafs were lucky with injuries last season. This year it's been the opposite. I think their record is pretty good given all the injuries.
Leeman4Gilmour
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: "Obviously, Reimer must be the, AB
Joined: 02.02.2010

Dec 3 @ 6:03 PM ET
its been the plan all year, let the goalie absorb 40 plus shots a game
- bobbyisno1


Both goalies can handle it as long as they keep the scoring chances down.

Reimer performed fine last year behind almost the exact same group. What's troubling is that they are failing to do the most fundamental things right now.

Phaneuf may have actually improved, and Gunnarson's health is step forward, but every other defenseman of this team has regressed.

From the sounds of it, Kulikov is a stone-cold defender who lacks consistency. At this point, I'd be willing to accept inconsistency if we got only flashes of competence.
bobbyisno1
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I'm excited to see that
Joined: 08.28.2010

Dec 3 @ 6:04 PM ET
We will be fine. Just need to make the playoffs.

It's 82 games - need to slump so we can make trades or practice, plus some of our best players have missed time.

- Garnie

we won't be fine. we all gonna die
RogerRoeper
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 03.27.2007

Dec 3 @ 6:06 PM ET
Kulikov interests me a lot. His value must be low right now.
aminnes
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Mrs. Buzzkill, AB
Joined: 12.17.2008

Dec 3 @ 6:06 PM ET
No, our D sucks. That's ALL on Nonis.
- Garnie


Absolutely. He spent the summer filling in areas of strength instead of the areas of weakness. Team toughness and scoring were fine, I love CLarkson but the LEafs had plenty of what he brings already. Same with the goalies, Bernier is a good golaie but they already had two good guys. In a cap you have to distribute monies properly and all they did was add unnecessarily.
Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 11.30.2009

Dec 3 @ 6:06 PM ET
Both goalies can handle it as long as they keep the scoring chances down.

Reimer performed fine last year behind almost the exact same group. What's troubling is that they are failing to do the most fundamental things right now.

Phaneuf may have actually improved, and Gunnarson's health is step forward, but every other defenseman of this team has regressed.

From the sounds of it, Kulikov is a stone-cold defender who lacks consistency. At this point, I'd be willing to accept inconsistency if we got only flashes of competence.

- Leeman4Gilmour


Our PK sucks!!!

I don't remember our PK last year looking like this years.


We have 1 forward covering 2 point men, like WTF?

You can give up shots, but not 1 timer after 1'timer from the hash marks

Garnie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 11.30.2009

Dec 3 @ 6:07 PM ET
we won't be fine. we all gonna die
- bobbyisno1


Yes, that's a given and not hockey related at all
RogerRoeper
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 03.27.2007

Dec 3 @ 6:07 PM ET
Absolutely. He spent the summer filling in areas of strength instead of the areas of weakness. Team toughness and scoring were fine, I love CLarkson but the LEafs had plenty of what he brings already. Same with the goalies, Bernier is a good golaie but they already had two good guys. In a cap you have to distribute monies properly and all they did was add unnecessarily.
- aminnes


Like who?

And who knows how Scrivens' numbers are in Toronto. Bernier has faced 60% more shots.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73  Next