Your not going to get me to say his name to get Banned.... My Jolly Leprahuan.
- youarewrong

You can get a ban for typing someone's name who is banned?



I just did it twice.

...and that's a ludicrous reason to ban someone unless they're on here arguing with the ref who banned them.

You can get a ban for typing someone's name who is banned?



I just did it twice.

...and that's a ludicrous reason to ban someone unless they're on here arguing with the ref who banned them.
- mayorofangrytown

Yes I have be banned before by mentioning someone that was banned.

What the hell does it take to get a lifetime ban....
- Giroux_Is_God

It doesn't concern anybody what happened in that case.

You can get a ban for typing someone's name who is banned?



I just did it twice.

...and that's a ludicrous reason to ban someone unless they're on here arguing with the ref who banned them.
- mayorofangrytown

Good to see nothing ever changes around here. I expect to be banned within the next 24 hours, blamed for someone's milk getting sour but you learn to live with it afte awhile.

It doesn't concern anybody what happened in that case.
- ob18

These are not the droids your looking for.....

Good to see nothing ever changes around here. I expect to be banned within the next 24 hours, blamed for someone's milk getting sour but you learn to live with it afte awhile.
- Schenn2shine

hi !

hi !
- -davies-

Hello Davies! How are you? How is life? What do you expect of tonight's game?

Post deletion in 5....4....3.....2....1.....

Hey Guys!

I have to admit that I'm very excited about tonight's game. Tonight we'll have what I consider to be a full line up. The line combinations and defense pairings I feel are acceptable. Hopefully we can over come a hugely slumping Power Play. I feel the Flyers have a real opportunity to turn it around on the road tonight.

I cannot say I'm a Berube fan at this point. I think he's beating a dead horse by forcing something that isn't working on the PP. I never understood how Raffl earned a spot on the first line earlier this season when he'd only been in the NHL 5 minutes. I don't think it's fair to Emery to hand Steve Mason the starting job, start Mason every single game and once Mason has a bad game, Berube basically throws a rusty Emery into the fire or under a bus (which ever way you'd like to go).

Right now I'm not buying what Berube is selling just yet. When the guy dares to try something new and it doesn't work half way through a game, he goes back to something that didn't work last week. Stay the course Chief.
- Schenn2shine

How've you been, man?

Explain a bit more what you don't like about the PP.

G on the half boards opposite JV, Simmonds in front and Kimmo at the top of the point getting stale?

The guy opposite G on the other half wall has to be able to pound a one timer, and I'm not sure that is Voracek's strong point.

I have never liked Hartsy and Simmer on the same PP unit, but it worked like magic last year, so I could be wrong.

Pompei is really cool if you have time.
- Marc D

so is herculaneum on a much smaller scale

Hello Davies! How are you? How is life? What do you expect of tonight's game?
- Schenn2shine

i'd love to see them turn a corner but my confidence level is low



happy that downie will be back though

define we
- -davies-

Are we allowed to say, "He who must not be named"?

How've you been, man?

Explain a bit more what you don't like about the PP.

G on the half boards opposite JV, Simmonds in front and Kimmo at the top of the point getting stale?

The guy opposite G on the other half wall has to be able to pound a one timer, and I'm not sure that is Voracek's strong point.

I have never liked Hartsy and Simmer on the same PP unit, but it worked like magic last year, so I could be wrong.
- Marc D

I'm really good buddy

Stale is the perfect wording to explain the power play. First I don't feel Hartnell and Simmonds are talented enough to play together down low. They're both net presence players. I feel one of them should be on the second unit and I feel like we had something going Lecavalier on the right halfway setting up from a one timer either through the box from Giroux or the top of the umbrella from Timonen or Streit. I feel both Streit and Lecavalier should be on that first unit.

Are we allowed to say, "He who must not be named"?
- youarewrong

How about just talking about hockey. Because talking about posters unable to respond is the issue.

Hey Guys!

I have to admit that I'm very excited about tonight's game. Tonight we'll have what I consider to be a full line up. The line combinations and defense pairings I feel are acceptable. Hopefully we can over come a hugely slumping Power Play. I feel the Flyers have a real opportunity to turn it around on the road tonight.

I cannot say I'm a Berube fan at this point. I think he's beating a dead horse by forcing something that isn't working on the PP. I never understood how Raffl earned a spot on the first line earlier this season when he'd only been in the NHL 5 minutes. I don't think it's fair to Emery to hand Steve Mason the starting job, start Mason every single game and once Mason has a bad game, Berube basically throws a rusty Emery into the fire or under a bus (which ever way you'd like to go).

Right now I'm not buying what Berube is selling just yet. When the guy dares to try something new and it doesn't work half way through a game, he goes back to something that didn't work last week. Stay the course Chief.
- Schenn2shine

Mason has earned the starting job through his play. I'd also say he has yet to have a bad game this season. Yes,he was pulled after the third goal in the Washington game, but none of those goals were his fault. It was more an attempt to wake up the team.

Emery went out and got a shutout -- albeit a rather easy, 14-save one -- the next night. He was going to start in that game regardless of what happened against the Caps.

I do agree that he's been juggling lines a little too much for my liking.

define we
- -davies-

we (w)
pron.
1. Used by the speaker or writer to indicate the speaker or writer along with another or others as the subject: We made it to the lecture hall on time. We are planning a trip to Arizona this winter.
2. Used to refer to people in general, including the speaker or writer: "How can we enter the professions and yet remain civilized human beings?" (Virginia Woolf).
3. Used instead of I, especially by a writer wishing to reduce or avoid a subjective tone.
4. Used instead of I, especially by an editorialist, in expressing the opinion or point of view of a publication's management.
5. Used instead of I by a sovereign in formal address to refer to himself or herself.
6. Used instead of you in direct address, especially to imply a patronizing camaraderie with the addressee: How are we feeling today?

i'd love to see them turn a corner but my confidence level is low



happy that downie will be back though
- -davies-

I loved the Downie for Talbot deal and I hope we manage to resign Downie to a reasonable cost. He's not the same player he was when he was traded. Clearly!

I cannot believe the outrage of the trade. Talbot must be the Flyers most beloved fourth line player...EVER!

How about just talking about hockey. Because talking about posters unable to respond is the issue.
- bodiva88

VOLDAMORT

VOLDAMORT
- youarewrong

i just picked up stamkos for giroux, the stamkos upside is key here

I loved the Downie for Talbot deal and I hope we manage to resign Downie to a reasonable cost. He's not the same player he was when he was traded. Clearly!

I cannot believe the outrage of the trade. Talbot must be the Flyers most beloved fourth line player...EVER!
- Schenn2shine

Talbot is a good guy and team mate but skill wise the Flyers won that deal.
As long as Downie doesn't self destruct.

Mason has earned the starting job through his play. I'd also say he has yet to have a bad game this season. Yes,he was pulled after the third goal in the Washington game, but none of those goals were his fault. It was more an attempt to wake up the team.

Emery went out and got a shutout -- albeit a rather easy, 14-save one -- the next night. He was going to start in that game regardless of what happened against the Caps.

I do agree that he's been juggling lines a little too much for my liking.
- bmeltzer

Prior to Laviolette being fired, I had the feeling Lavy was gonna have the two netminders compete for the starting job. Well obviously that changed the moment Berube took over. I'm not in the least saying Mason hasn't played well. He has. What I am saying is, he's not the second coming of Martin Brodeur. I feel even if Mason is our clear cut starter (and he is) we're over using him already. If Emery were to get a little more playing time, I think Emery would equal Mason. In fact, I was hoping Emery would start tonight and Mason tomorrow, seeing that Mason is the one more in a groove. Tomorrow night is against our arch rivals and division foes.

LET'S GO FLYERS!!! CLAP! ~ CLAP! ~ CLAP!CLAP!CLAP!!!



LET'S GO FLYERS!!! CLAP! ~ CLAP! ~ CLAP!CLAP!CLAP!!!



LET'S GO FLYERS!!! CLAP! ~ CLAP! ~ CLAP!CLAP!CLAP!!!
- ggunky

Bump

My favorite part of the announcing is when Jackson is like, the Ref in front of the play didn't call the penality, but the one way back on the blue line did.... lol Its may favorite part...

Talbot is a good guy and team mate but skill wise the Flyers won that deal.
As long as Downie doesn't self destruct.
- Marc D

Believe it or not, a week before we traded for Downie, I was thinking it would be great to pick up a guy like Downie or Steve Ott. Just a guy who can stir the lot and back up his words a little. Steve Ott in my opinion is wasting away with the Sabres and has plenty to give elsewhere.

Pittsburgh doesn't play tonight and Ottawa doesn't play tommorrow night. Why the heck didn't the league schedule Pittsburgh tonight and Ottawa tommorrow for the Flyers?

As far as i can tell there's no scheduling conflicts. A Pittsburgh, Ottawa, Winipeg schedule would've been so much easier on the travel. You cut out one complete round trip flight to Canada.
- Flyers_01

There's about 20 mins difference in flight time between the two itineraries.

PHL to PITT to OTT to WPG to PHL
or
PHL to OTT to PITT to WPG to PHL

They won't come back to PHL before going to WPG in either case.