SimpleJack
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Chicago , IL Joined: 05.23.2013
|
|
|
Preds getting outscored 13-0 over their past 7 and a half periods of play VS the Jets, Devils, and Islanders....and thats after back to back wins at LA and COL....its crazy how these things work sometimes.... |
|
UnnamedSource
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Local Mall, IL Joined: 01.03.2012
|
|
|
Just thinking maybe a seasonal Christmas touch...but I understand. Great stories today. Meant to ask did the greek girl have a thicker stache than you? All in good humor no offense intended. - TrueGrit
Not back then but saw her at my 20 year reunion a few months ago and.....she...should...wax. |
|
rtang415
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Palatine, IL Joined: 02.07.2009
|
|
|
Not back then but saw her at my 20 year reunion a few months ago and.....she...should...wax. - UnnamedSource
|
|
ArlingtonRob
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: 230 years was a good run, IL Joined: 01.20.2012
|
|
|
Can you believe it...the "World's Greatest Goalie" just gave up a second goal to the Devils...at the Garden no less!
How can that be? |
|
UnnamedSource
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Local Mall, IL Joined: 01.03.2012
|
|
|
Can you believe it...the "World's Greatest Goalie" just gave up a second goal to the Devils...at the Garden no less!
How can that be? - ArlingtonRob
Lundqvist is one of my favs |
|
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.18.2009
|
|
|
Settling down to watch the Yotes and Blues. - rtang415
I guess I am too. My wife walks into the room and immediately puts the game on - on her own, without me having to suggest anything.
I'm slowly brainwashing her. |
|
tomcat24
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Gomer's Pyle, IL Joined: 06.04.2012
|
|
|
Thank you Carolina. An East team actually beat one of our competition. Of course they really just hung on in the 3rd. They got lucky as hell |
|
powerenforcer
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Wheeling, IL Joined: 09.24.2009
|
|
|
I am reading posts about point systems/ties, and there is a simple way to look at ties - 1 team loses a point and 1 team gains a point. A team that gives up the tying goal (and the game ends in a tie) lost 1 point they had. A team that scores the tying goal (and the game ends a tie) earned a point they didn't have. So instead of the OTL column, there should be T+ and T-, where the team with the higher number of T+ (which means they tied more games, earning the extra point) should get the tie breaker. You want offense, then a team should not play for the tie.
Really think about this and it makes the most sense. Ties do have winners and losers! |
|
DarthKane
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: 5.13.4.9 Joined: 02.23.2012
|
|
|
I guess I am too. My wife walks into the room and immediately puts the game on - on her own, without me having to suggest anything.
I'm slowly brainwashing her. - EKolb13
It's the Jets and Wings for me. |
|
StLBravesFan
Season Ticket Holder Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.03.2011
|
|
|
Thank you Carolina. An East team actually beat one of our competition. Of course they really just hung on in the 3rd. They got lucky as hell - tomcat24
Can Phoenix hold on against Blues? |
|
StLBravesFan
Season Ticket Holder Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.03.2011
|
|
|
I am reading posts about point systems/ties, and there is a simple way to look at ties - 1 team loses a point and 1 team gains a point. A team that gives up the tying goal (and the game ends in a tie) lost 1 point they had. A team that scores the tying goal (and the game ends a tie) earned a point they didn't have. So instead of the OTL column, there should be T+ and T-, where the team with the higher number of T+ (which means they tied more games, earning the extra point) should get the tie breaker. You want offense, then a team should not play for the tie.
Really think about this and it makes the most sense. Ties do have winners and losers! - powerenforcer
0-0 game? No plus or minus - ok.
Too damn complicated: the standings are too complicated to read now- ROW / SOW / SOL - makes my brain hurt.
Play to a win somehow. |
|
UnnamedSource
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Local Mall, IL Joined: 01.03.2012
|
|
|
I am reading posts about point systems/ties, and there is a simple way to look at ties - 1 team loses a point and 1 team gains a point. A team that gives up the tying goal (and the game ends in a tie) lost 1 point they had. A team that scores the tying goal (and the game ends a tie) earned a point they didn't have. So instead of the OTL column, there should be T+ and T-, where the team with the higher number of T+ (which means they tied more games, earning the extra point) should get the tie breaker. You want offense, then a team should not play for the tie.
Really think about this and it makes the most sense. Ties do have winners and losers! - powerenforcer
I need ibuprofen...... |
|
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.18.2009
|
|
|
0-0 game? No plus or minus - ok.
Too damn complicated: the standings are too complicated to read now- ROW / SOW / SOL - makes my brain hurt.
Play to a win somehow. - StLBravesFan
...or play to a tie. Three columns: Wins, Losses, Ties. That's all it needs to be. I'm with you, I can live without the rest of the crap. |
|
EKB13
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.18.2009
|
|
|
I am reading posts about point systems/ties, and there is a simple way to look at ties - 1 team loses a point and 1 team gains a point. A team that gives up the tying goal (and the game ends in a tie) lost 1 point they had. A team that scores the tying goal (and the game ends a tie) earned a point they didn't have. So instead of the OTL column, there should be T+ and T-, where the team with the higher number of T+ (which means they tied more games, earning the extra point) should get the tie breaker. You want offense, then a team should not play for the tie.
Really think about this and it makes the most sense. Ties do have winners and losers! - powerenforcer
This is even more complicated than the current system. |
|
tomcat24
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Gomer's Pyle, IL Joined: 06.04.2012
|
|
|
Can Phoenix hold on against Blues? - StLBravesFan
And even though Buffalo let LA tie the game with a few minutes left, LA can only get a shootout win now, that helps. Plus Quick left in OT. Buffalo just WON the shootout against LA |
|
HawkintheD
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Sick Bay, MI Joined: 02.22.2012
|
|
|
This is even more complicated than the current system. - EKolb13
Sounds like a winner to me! |
|
UnnamedSource
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Local Mall, IL Joined: 01.03.2012
|
|
|
Looking forward to the Klinkhammer video tribute on Thursday.... |
|
rollpards19
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Where ever doesn't get me hit, IL Joined: 05.03.2012
|
|
|
I am reading posts about point systems/ties, and there is a simple way to look at ties - 1 team loses a point and 1 team gains a point. A team that gives up the tying goal (and the game ends in a tie) lost 1 point they had. A team that scores the tying goal (and the game ends a tie) earned a point they didn't have. So instead of the OTL column, there should be T+ and T-, where the team with the higher number of T+ (which means they tied more games, earning the extra point) should get the tie breaker. You want offense, then a team should not play for the tie.
Really think about this and it makes the most sense. Ties do have winners and losers! - powerenforcer
Why should you be rewarded for being behind instead of being ahead? That's ridiculous |
|
UnnamedSource
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Local Mall, IL Joined: 01.03.2012
|
|
|
Sounds like a winner to me! - HawkintheD
What up D? |
|
HawkintheD
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Sick Bay, MI Joined: 02.22.2012
|
|
|
What up D? - UnnamedSource
Hey US! Just stopped by to VALIDATE a few of your posts.
|
|
StLBravesFan
Season Ticket Holder Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: IL Joined: 07.03.2011
|
|
|
Buffalo beats LA in SO.
First home win for Sabres. |
|
HawkintheD
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Sick Bay, MI Joined: 02.22.2012
|
|
|
Looking forward to the Klinkhammer video tribute on Thursday.... - UnnamedSource
I think they're retiring his number too...was it 15 or 45...maybe?
|
|
UnnamedSource
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Local Mall, IL Joined: 01.03.2012
|
|
|
Why should you be rewarded for being behind instead of being ahead? That's ridiculous - rollpards19
....I like the 4 minute 4 on 4....4 minute 3 on 3 then the shootout |
|
Ogilthorpe2
Season Ticket Holder Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: 37,000 FT Joined: 07.09.2009
|
|
|
Hey US! Just stopped by to VALIDATE a few of your posts.
- HawkintheD
|
|
UnnamedSource
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
|
Location: Local Mall, IL Joined: 01.03.2012
|
|
|
Hey US! Just stopped by to VALIDATE a few of your posts.
- HawkintheD
I appreciate that........please let me know if you have any VALID concerns....... |
|