Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
Del Zotto to Vancouver is not happening, EK is shooting blanks. I will sign up for a Hockeybuzz 10 year season pass if it does. Challenge is on! - VanHockeyGuy
MDZ, Dorset, Zucc and Brassard for booth, Setisto and Edler. Its coming |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
Agree with this, I'd definitely trade Edler for Voracek and even add in a pick or prospect to make that happen, but I'd want a better d-man in return if I'm trading a player like Hansen or Burrows. Sounds like Del Zotto is more of a third pairing PP specialist type to me, he's no Ehrhoff. I know he's still young, but he isn't exactly progressing from what I've been reading and from what his puck possession stats show. - Nucker101
MDZ is Ehrhoff |
|
Beatle_john
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Corner of Kirk Maclean's Toe and Robert Reichel's face. Joined: 01.09.2006
|
|
|
I just know enough about Del Zotto yet. |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
I agree with the general sentiment, Herr Doctor, but I nonetheless think there are limits, and a point where you are looking at diminishing returns. For example, as much as I hate Marchand, he's still a valuable asset (uggg, did I really just say that? ) in terms of what he brings (both skill and agitation wise).
The key difference between Marchand (and similar players like him) and Downie, though, is that the former does not have the 'snap' factor that Downie has. If you can't trust your player to control himself and know that at any time he can potentially have a very adverse impact on your team (especially when the difference between success and failure on any given night is such a small one) then it's simply not worth the on-going headache.
P.S. I think there is a reason why Downie has now been traded 4 times in 5 years - Zogg
Its great to have guy who can walk that line. Down ie cant. He's proven this time and time again. He is a cancer |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
MDZ is Ehrhoff - Bieksa#3
Disagree big time. |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
I see what you're saying but in that event you would need to have another deal in place where one of our existing D gets shipped out in order for MDZ to make any sense. Not sure if Gillis has been speaking with anyone on waiving their NTC. I'm also guessing Sather would be seeking more than Higgins or Hansen for MDZ (though I could be wrong).
The NYR fans are saying Torts was not a big MDZ and used to bench him regularly. If NYR were looking for someone like Burrows that's too much already. - AlexF
MDZ had some awful good numbers for a d man under 23 while with torts. Find me 3 ranger fans who say anything good about torts. Its comical |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
Disagree big time. - Nucker101
Show me Ehrhoffs numbers from 18-23 and now MDZs. To even consider Ehrhoff or MDZ long term is laughable |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Show me Ehrhoffs numbers from 18-23 and now MDZs. To even consider Ehrhoff or MDZ long term is laughable - Bieksa#3
I never watched Ehrhoff at the age, but by number scouting(basic and advanced), Ehrhoff was better at at a younger age as well and right now it's not even close. |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
I never watched Ehrhoff at the age, but by number scouting(basic and advanced), Ehrhoff was better at at a younger age as well and right now it's not even close. - Nucker101
Post the numbers |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
I never watched Ehrhoff at the age, but by number scouting(basic and advanced), Ehrhoff was better at at a younger age as well and right now it's not even close. - Nucker101
That's because Ehrhoff didn't break until the league until he was older. He's a better player now, but to say he was better younger I believe is inaccurate. If scouts were so much higher on Ehrhoff back then why did he drop to the 4th round? |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
That's because Ehrhoff didn't break until the league until he was older. He's a better player now, but to say he was better younger I believe is inaccurate. If scouts were so much higher on Ehrhoff back then why did he drop to the 4th round? - golfingsince
289 points for Ehrhoff. 12 by the time he was 24
113 points for DelZotto. 110 before turning 23
So How was Ehrhoff better on basic stats at a young age Nucker |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
289 points for Ehrhoff. 12 by the time he was 24
113 points for DelZotto. 110 before turning 23
So How was Ehrhoff better on basic stats at a young age Nucker - Bieksa#3
How much is MDZ gonna get this summer? |
|
Zogg
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Joined: 09.16.2005
|
|
|
Its great to have guy who can walk that line. Down ie cant. He's proven this time and time again. He is a cancer - Bieksa#3
Agreed. There are very few players that are able to walk that line and Downie has demonstrated on many occasions that he is unable to do so (which is actually too bad, because he does have a decent skill-set to go along with his physicality) |
|
dshiddy
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Canucks blogger in disguise., BC Joined: 06.23.2008
|
|
|
Trade between Rocky and Yeti is unfair. I'm not liking Yeti's moves.
Veto! |
|
AlexF
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Whistler, BC Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
Disagree big time. - Nucker101
x2 |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
How much is MDZ gonna get this summer? - golfingsince
Gonna say around 4 mil. Carlson, Voynov, Josi. Etc |
|
|
|
I see what you're saying but in that event you would need to have another deal in place where one of our existing D gets shipped out in order for MDZ to make any sense. Not sure if Gillis has been speaking with anyone on waiving their NTC. I'm also guessing Sather would be seeking more than Higgins or Hansen for MDZ (though I could be wrong).
The NYR fans are saying Torts was not a big MDZ and used to bench him regularly. If NYR were looking for someone like Burrows that's too much already. - AlexF
Very seldom fo these rumours turn out so I doubt it too. When Hansen is ready we do have one extra forward and that is not including Weise or Booth |
|
LeftCoaster
|
|
|
Location: Valley Of The Sun, AZ Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Trade between Rocky and Yeti is unfair. I'm not liking Yeti's moves.
Veto! - dshiddy
Quit your whining |
|
AlexF
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Whistler, BC Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
289 points for Ehrhoff. 12 by the time he was 24
113 points for DelZotto. 110 before turning 23
So How was Ehrhoff better on basic stats at a young age Nucker - Bieksa#3
If player development were only so linear, far less GMs would end up with egg on their face. Saying MDZ was better at a comparable younger age than Ehrhoff doesn't mean he'll end up becoming greater or even the same caliber player than Ehrhoff.
Ehrhoff > MDZ. What happens in the future is anyone's guess. |
|
AlexF
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Whistler, BC Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
Very seldom fo these rumours turn out so I doubt it too. When Hansen is ready we do have one extra forward and that is not including Weise or Booth - VANTEL
Agreed. You'll always need spares as it seems virtually impossible these days that any team can stay healthy for long, but we definitely should be angling for upgrades, as has been well discussed here. |
|
Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
If player development were only so linear, far less GMs would end up with egg on their face. Saying MDZ was better than a comparible younger age than Ehrhoff doesn't mean he'll end up becoming more or even the same caliber player than Ehrhoff.
Ehrhoff > MDZ. What happens in the future is anyone's guess. - AlexF
Nucker said Ehrhoff was better at a younger age in basic stats and that it wasn't even close. Clearly he's full of it. If he thinks that MDZ will never be the player Ehrhoff currently is then that's a fair opinion. But no need to make Hoff seem better then he is |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Trade between Rocky and Yeti is unfair. I'm not liking Yeti's moves.
Veto! - dshiddy
That was a brilliant trade for him. I can't believe some pussies would veto the deal. |
|
|
|
MDZ had some awful good numbers for a d man under 23 while with torts. Find me 3 ranger fans who say anything good about torts. Its comical - Bieksa#3
There's lots of ranger fans that were pissed that torts was fired . Their blogger was one of them . I didn't care for him but even care less for AV . I do like the style they are TRYING to play . They just don't have the higher end talent to play it . But the last six or so games they look alot better . Good thing they are in a poop division |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
If player development were only so linear, far less GMs would end up with egg on their face. Saying MDZ was better at a comparable younger age than Ehrhoff doesn't mean he'll end up becoming greater or even the same caliber player than Ehrhoff.
Ehrhoff > MDZ. What happens in the future is anyone's guess. - AlexF
This. The site I was using didn't show age if the players, didn't realize the difference between the two's age was so big when they started. I still stand by my original statement though and completely agree with Alex. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
This. The site I was using didn't show age if the players, didn't realize the difference between the two's age was so big when they started. I still stand by my original statement though and completely agree with Alex. - Nucker101
All of your original statement or just a part of it? |
|