Bolland done for year..

Just fill the team buffet with Big Macs and Wellwood will find a way to get there
- Bieksa#3

Fill the other team's net with Big Macs and he'll be driving the net like Getzlaf.

Fill the other team's net with Big Macs and he'll be driving the net like Getzlaf.
- Leeman4Gilmour

Sadly he will be denied by Penner.

I simply refuse to accept bozak returning is the solution to a problem.

I just can't do it
- Dozzer

Until they pony up for a true #1 he's what they got. IMO no nuts should have chose between bolland and bozak. Not spent on both

BOLLAND out for 30-40 games.

We (frank)in' sucked from start to finish. No way to defend that effort. End of story.

Until they pony up for a true #1 he's what they got. IMO no nuts should have chose between bolland and bozak. Not spent on both
- Bieksa#3

He didn't spend on Bolland. He traded for him with one year left on his contract. It's not exactly a restricting situation.

Booth is a steal at 4.2 ..... ..... oh wait.
- jbold

Canucks never pay him for more than a few weeks at a time.... after that he is paid by insurance and off the books by February.

Bolland done for year..
- Fruitcakenipple

Friedman says 30-40 games if it's anything like Karlsson.

Until they pony up for a true #1 he's what they got. IMO no nuts should have chose between bolland and bozak. Not spent on both
- Bieksa#3

You won't get an argument from me about bozak

What happened to Kadri?
- Bieksa#3

HH made him a legitimate 1C

Booth is a steal at 4.2 ..... ..... oh wait.
- jbold

Is there any canuck fan anywhere that would deny this. Right now him and Clarkson are equally as useful. And that is about as much as a poopy flavoured lolipop.

He didn't spend on Bolland. He traded for him with one year left on his contract. It's not exactly a restricting situation.
- Jeffmt

He's a Canucks fan. Give him some slack. He doesn't know very much.

Bolland done for year..
- Fruitcakenipple

No.... two Canuck Dmen had this over the past few years. 50 games. But it is not the year.

Until they pony up for a true #1 he's what they got. IMO no nuts should have chose between bolland and bozak. Not spent on both
- Bieksa#3

Yes, because the prudent thing for a team that needs centers to do is let a center walk.

He didn't spend on Bolland. He traded for him with one year left on his contract. It's not exactly a restricting situation.
- Jeffmt

? If u trade for bolland then don't resign bozak, and visa versa. Is this a tough concept to grasp?

We (frank)in' sucked from start to finish. No way to defend that effort. End of story.
- As_I_See_It

Dont see anyone defending it...

Yes, because the prudent thing for a team that needs centers to do is let a center walk.
- Leeman4Gilmour

Like buying out grabovski?

Is there any canuck fan anywhere that would deny this. Right now him and Clarkson are equally as useful. And that is about as much as a poopy flavoured lolipop.
- Bieksa#3

The only reason Booth was not bought out is that he has yet to actually play a season and no one knew his ........ oh screw it... the guy is crap.

Yes, because the prudent thing for a team that needs centers to do is let a center walk.
- Leeman4Gilmour

Or spend that money on something else rather then do patch work

? If u trade for bolland then don't resign bozak, and visa versa. Is this a tough concept to grasp?
- Bieksa#3

You said he spent on both. I corrected you. That shouldn't be so difficult. Give it another try, you'll get it.

Like buying out grabovski?


- Dozzer

We were talking about decent centers who dont float around and do nothing.

Yes, because the prudent thing for a team that needs centers to do is let a center walk.
- Leeman4Gilmour

*cough*Grabovski*cough*

edit: Late...damn you dozer!

Like buying out grabovski?


- Dozzer

Bingo. Don't resign bozak. Keep grabo and buyout liles

Bingo. Don't resign bozak. Keep grabo and buyout liles
- Bieksa#3

Bingo. Keep Schneider, trade Luongo and his poopty contra.... oh.