Bieksa#3
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 07.21.2009
|
|
|
For a crusty old guy he has a sense of humour - VANTEL
You would have thought at least one of the sutter boys would have got a personality at birth, but nope |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Agreed, you do what you can with what's at your disposal. I wonder if it's sustainable though, if he's not running these guys into the ground. Maybe that's just me being paranoid. - AlexF
Yup, that has to be a legit concern. Another reason why acquiring a top 6 forward is a pressing need. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
When questioned about his lack of physical play
Dustin Brown "I get more physical as the season goes on"
Daryl Sutter responds "Well, the season is going on"
- Bieksa#3
Sutter does crack me up with his smartass comments. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Yup, that has to be a legit concern. Another reason why acquiring a top 6 forward is a pressing need. - Nucker101
With what? It's not like we just need a top 6 forward, we need a 2nd line difference maker. |
|
|
|
You would have thought at least one of the sutter boys would have got a personality at birth, but nope - Bieksa#3
|
|
|
|
With what? It's not like we just need a top 6 forward, we need a 2nd line difference maker. - golfingsince
Isn't that why we pay Burr 4.5 |
|
AlexF
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Whistler, BC Joined: 06.25.2011
|
|
|
With what? It's not like we just need a top 6 forward, we need a 2nd line difference maker. - golfingsince
Edler would be my choice (has to waive though). He's certainly not surplus to requirements but with Bieksa-Hanhuis-Edler-Garrison as our top 4 all chewing up 4.5m+ each, I think we would gain more by adding that top6er than we would lose by trading one of these guys. |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
You would have thought at least one of the sutter boys would have got a personality at birth, but nope - Bieksa#3
so true. That must have been a dreary farm. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
With what? It's not like we just need a top 6 forward, we need a 2nd line difference maker. - golfingsince
Realistic suggestions have been made here. If Dallas is out of the hunt they'll likely move Whitney. Desperate teams like the Rangers or Flyers who have GM's that aren't afraid to make big moves could be open to deals.
Let's say the Stars fall out of the race. I think offering up a 2nd plus a prospect/young player could land you Whitney, just like it did with Roy. If Edler was willing to waive to go to Philly I think a Edler + pick/prospect for Voracek deal could interest Philly. Maybe Edmonton would be willing to deal Hemsky as a rental, although Mac T might still be pissed about Schneider and ask for too much.
If not, then play this season out and buyout Booth. Resign the Twins and take advantage of the cap increase/Booth buyout to sign a forward. |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
Isn't that why we pay Burr 4.5 - VANTEL
Nope. They pay Burr 4.5 for this:
|
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Edler would be my choice (has to waive though). He's certainly not surplus to requirements but with Bieksa-Hanhuis-Edler-Garrison as our top 4 all chewing up 4.5m+ each, I think we would gain more by adding that top6er than we would lose by trading one of these guys. - AlexF
Then we'd better add a forward and get a depth D back in the deal. I'm not comfortable with Weber or Ahlberts being the 7th guy when it counts. Edler and Bieksa are the best bets to move IMO. |
|
|
|
Nope. They pay Burr 4.5 for this:
- bloatedmosquito
I agree but golf said wee need a second line, I sure hope he is part of the top 6 |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Realistic suggestions have been made here. If Dallas is out of the hunt they'll likely move Whitney. Desperate teams like the Rangers or Flyers who have GM's that aren't afraid to make big moves could be open to deals.
Let's say the Stars fall out of the race. I think offering up a 2nd plus a prospect/young player could land you Whitney, just like it did with Roy. If Edler was willing to waive to go to Philly I think a Edler + pick/prospect for Voracek deal could interest Philly. Maybe Edmonton would be willing to deal Hemsky as a rental, although Mac T might still be pissed about Schneider and ask for too much.
If not, then play this season out and buyout Booth. Resign the Twins and take advantage of the cap increase/Booth buyout to sign a forward. - Nucker101
Sorry, but Whitney isn't going to get us the Cup. So next year, we're down another 2nd and another prospect. I'd MUCH rather sacrifice the season when we have top 6 talent coming then fritter away more picks for players that in the end won't make a difference. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
I agree but golf said wee need a second line, I sure hope he is part of the top 6 - VANTEL
Yeah, we need a 2nd line difference maker. Not just another Roy, Booth, etc. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Then we'd better add a forward and get a depth D back in the deal. I'm not comfortable with Weber or Ahlberts being the 7th guy when it counts. Edler and Bieksa are the best bets to move IMO. - golfingsince
Ideally you'd make that move with Corrado getting a half of a season under his belt in the AHL and ready to step in to a third pairing. If I was MG I'd be open to packaging Tanev or trading Edler(NTC*). |
|
|
|
Sorry, but Whitney isn't going to get us the Cup. So next year, we're down another 2nd and another prospect. I'd MUCH rather sacrifice the season when we have top 6 talent coming then fritter away more picks for players that in the end won't make a difference. - golfingsince
MG Still thinks Booth is a top 6 |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Sorry, but Whitney isn't going to get us the Cup. So next year, we're down another 2nd and another prospect. I'd MUCH rather sacrifice the season when we have top 6 talent coming then fritter away more picks for players that in the end won't make a difference. - golfingsince
Yeah, IMO the best plan is to play this season out and buyout Booth and go from there. I'd love too see that Edler-Voracek deal happen though. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
MG Still thinks Booth is a top 6 - VANTEL
I'm sure even he is starting to question it(won't admit though). |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
I agree but golf said wee need a second line, I sure hope he is part of the top 6 - VANTEL
Funny thing. I've watched it like 6 times in a row now. Pathetic. But I'll never forget it. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Ideally you'd make that move with Corrado getting a half of a season under his belt in the AHL and ready to step in to a third pairing. If I was MG I'd be open to packaging Tanev or trading Edler(NTC*). - Nucker101
Yeah, the Corrado becoming 3rd pairing was assumed. Actually, it's assumed he moves up as he's needed come playoff time or down the stretch if necessary. |
|
Nucker101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 09.26.2010
|
|
|
Funny thing. I've watched it like 6 times in a row now. Pathetic. But I'll never forget it. - bloatedmosquito
That and the Bieksa goals were (frank)ing awesome. (frank) so close that year. |
|
|
|
Funny thing. I've watched it like 6 times in a row now. Pathetic. But I'll never forget it. - bloatedmosquito
It was an epic goal in the history of the team |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
That and the Bieksa goals were (frank)ing awesome. (frank) so close that year. - Nucker101
It hurts right down to the bottom of my balls. Gutted still. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
It hurts right down to the bottom of my balls. Gutted still. - bloatedmosquito
Sounds like it could be Syphilis |
|
|
|
Sounds like it could be Syphilis - golfingsince
Blue balls |
|