That was a nice little lick. Can't remember who he put it on but it was solid.
- scotch_tape

Wasn't he penalized on the play?

Vancouver, almost no secondary scoring past Kesler, I mean (frank)...Higgins, Santerelli in the top-6? Bleh.
- AdamFrench

BUT THEY HAVE ZACH KASSIAN!!!!

Vancouver, almost no secondary scoring past Kesler, I mean (frank)...Higgins, Santerelli in the top-6? Bleh.
- AdamFrench

Remember when Booth scored 30 goals?








It's been a long time.

Galchenyuk's goal... good or not?

Remember when Booth scored 30 goals?








Long time.
- Scabeh

Desharnais for Booth!

Galchenyuk's goal... good or not?
- DrRecchi

I honestly think it wasn't a good goal.

There was a small mouvement on his part to help the puck go in th net.

This being said, I always believed the whole idea of this kind of goal being illegal to be silly.

Desharnais for Booth!
- DrRecchi

My god!

A trade involving Desharnais I might say no to.

Well done Doc!

BUT THEY HAVE ZACH KASSIAN!!!!
- DrRecchi

He's turning out to be a pretty sweet bust.

Put a log beside the Sedin's and it'll have 20 goals, (frank)ing evil ginger twin wizards.

Galchenyuk's goal... good or not?
- DrRecchi

Apparently good, since Zibanejad did the same thing against Montreal and it was called a good goal, in the playoffs no less.

Wasn't he penalized on the play?
- Scabeh

For interference. The worst call of the night. That is until the next call on Kreider.

He's turning out to be a pretty sweet bust.

Put a log beside the Sedin's and it'll have 20 goals, (frank)ing evil ginger twin wizards.
- AdamFrench

Daniel Sedin scored a beauty last night. holy poop what a shot.

http://video.nhl.com/vide...nsole?id=2013020175-574-h

Apparentkly good, since Zibanejad did the same thing against Montreal and it was called a good goal, in the playoffs no less.
- Pecafan Fan

That was different.

Apparentkly good, since Zibanejad did the same thing against Montreal and it was called a good goal, in the playoffs no less.
- Pecafan Fan

Yeah, if that goal was good, they all are.

I honestly think it wasn't a good goal.

There was a small mouvement on his part to help the puck go in th net.

This being said, I always believed the whole idea of this kind of goal being illegal to be silly.
- Scabeh

That's allowed (the movement, not your spelling).

For interference. The worst call of the night. That is until the next call on Kreider.
- hscesq

That was different.
- dt99999

No.

That was different.
- dt99999

No, it was the same thing.

But since you're a Sens fan, I'm not surprised you see it differently.

- Scabeh

Thank you Dave Jackson from Kirkland!!

That's allowed (the movement, not your spelling).
- hscesq

Bleh, I'm tired as hell this morning.

No, it was the same thing.

But since you're a Sens fan, I'm not surprised you see it differently.
- Pecafan Fan

- hscesq

yesssss

- hscesq

That (frank)ing guy, unbelievable.

I honestly think it wasn't a good goal.

There was a small mouvement on his part to help the puck go in th net.

This being said, I always believed the whole idea of this kind of goal being illegal to be silly.
- Scabeh

They should just change the rule.

"Distinct kicking motion" leaves room for interpretation.

Originally, I believe the rule was made to prevent skates from flying high in the crease and reduce injury risks.

If the skate leaves the ice, it should be disallowed. If it stays on the ice (as when braking), even if it is voluntarily redirected, it should count.

That (frank)ing guy, unbelievable.
- Pecafan Fan

The nerves...

That (frank)ing guy, unbelievable.
- Pecafan Fan

He's disgusting.