Why do you watch?
- UnnamedSource

Don't you read? This is the third time I am answering this. I watch because it is a comedy. I like to watch. I like to see people like you trying to convince me that this is all legit. I like to watch and see what the next failure Bettman and crew will make.

Kompon covering his mouth his laminated play card which is phuck'n laughable on its own...but who's going to glean any intel even if they could read HIS lips ?



2014 will come before we get a verdict on this goal

Hit shaws stick ..high stick..no goal...
- TrueGrit

Hit Shaw's stick high, but it was put in the net by Backstrom and the other Wild player - didn't go directly from Shaw's stick over the goal line.

Should be a good goal.

STONER put it over the line - should be a good goal.

Kompon covering his mouth his laminated play card which is phuck'n laughable on its own...but who's going to glean any intel even if they could read HIS lips ?



2014 will come before we get a verdict on this goal
- philco28

Stevie Walkom on the other line pleading his case to phuck the hawks.

Kompon covering his mouth his laminated play card which is phuck'n laughable on its own...but who's going to glean any intel even if they could read HIS lips ?



2014 will come before we get a verdict on this goal
- philco28

Good thing the clocks went back an hour over here

Stoner's dumbarse pushed it over the line after the high stick. I say goal

Or is the puck dead immediately after Shaw hits it with high stick??

So I hear.... but fear not, the Wild will help your team turn their woes around.

Good call on the highstick of Shaw, just now saw it
- SotaPopinski

As an aside, good to see you around, Sota. Drop by more often if you can.

Hit Shaw's stick high, but it was put in the net by Backstrom and the other Wild player - didn't go directly from Shaw's stick over the goal line.

Should be a good goal.

STONER put it over the line - should be a good goal.
- StLBravesFan

This is I'm sure what they're looking at.

Great call!!

WHAT THE FLYING PHUCK

Hit Shaw's stick high, but it was put in the net by Backstrom and the other Wild player - didn't go directly from Shaw's stick over the goal line.

Should be a good goal.

STONER put it over the line - should be a good goal.
- StLBravesFan

Apparently need possession and control after the high stick according to the explanation.

Phantom penalty to Hossa - bad call (IMO) - maybe PE is correct - maybe the CIA DID kill JFK.

Edit to add: Especially after what could have been goalie interference on Stamkos last game.

Stevie Walkom on the other line pleading his case to phuck the hawks.
- CBHawks88

Another win for the PHUCK THE HAWKS as shooooooooooooooooooooole.....
ROBBED OF A GOAL...puck never went in off Shaw's 'high stick'. Went in after...goal should have stood. NO DEBATE.

As an aside, good to see you around, Sota. Drop by more often if you can.
- NewToHockey

Appreciate the hospitality. You negative frankers are a fun bunch to hang around

Good thing the clocks went back an hour over here
- prd797

uh-oh. Looks like you are correct.
- Tugboat

Check the time stamp boys...

Appreciate the hospitality. You negative frankers are a fun bunch to hang around
- SotaPopinski

You fit right in

Hit Shaw's stick high, but it was put in the net by Backstrom and the other Wild player - didn't go directly from Shaw's stick over the goal line.

Should be a good goal.

STONER put it over the line - should be a good goal.
- StLBravesFan

They have to demonstrate control. Did not...

BICKS

No doubt abut that one!

Bickell!!!

Four games in a row for Bickell!

Apparently need possession and control after the high stick according to the explanation.
- NewToHockey

Yet on a delayed penalty, you just need to touch the puck and it is considered possession. Sounds like they can make up rules as they go along.

Bicks 4 in 4!!!

Wow... 4 in 4 games

Four for Bickel.

Won't say "should be tied".

Won't say it.