I agree, but their d is pathetic
- Bieksa#3

It is, but it shouldn't be.

Overall. I thought they were hilarious.
- golfingsince

their might not be one in the top 10

their might not be one in the top 10
- Bieksa#3

Maybe the Skins.

There are only really 3 or 4 in the AFC, and then the rest are NFC.

Say

Broncos
Pats
Bengals
Texans
Niners
Seahawks
Packers
Falcons
Bears
Skins

Maybe the Skins.

There are only really 3 or 4 in the AFC, and then the rest are NFC.

Say

Broncos
Pats
Bengals
Texans
Niners
Seahawks
Packers
Falcons
Bears
Skins
- golfingsince

Maybe the Skins.

There are only really 3 or 4 in the AFC, and then the rest are NFC.

Say

Broncos
Pats
Bengals
Texans
Niners
Seahawks
Packers
Falcons
Bears
Skins
- golfingsince

Rams are a top 10 team. As are the Bergals. Pats are not. That whole division is awful

Rams are a top 10 team. As are the Bergals. Pats are not. That whole division is awful
- Bieksa#3

That's bold. Then Arizona is too? The Pats are a top 10 team for sure, and the Dolphins are on the rise. Might even get a wild card.

That's bold. Then Arizona is too? The Pats are a top 10 team for sure, and the Dolphins are on the rise. Might even get a wild card.
- golfingsince

Arizona isn't bad. And I think the Rams are gonna be a powerhouse starting next yr. But IMO they are a top 10 team.

Weakest division in hockey?
I think so!

Arizona isn't bad. And I think the Rams are gonna be a powerhouse starting next yr. But IMO they are a top 10 team.
- Bieksa#3

The Cards, Rams, Dolphins and Browns are all next tier teams. They all have excellent D's but are missing pieces offensively. The Rams are going to struggle with their strength of schedule IMO. The Dolphins will be a strong team next year once they fix that O-line.

The Cards, Rams, Dolphins and Browns are all next tier teams. They all have excellent D's but are missing pieces offensively. The Rams are going to struggle with their strength of schedule IMO. The Dolphins will be a strong team next year once they fix that O-line.
- golfingsince

I think people are about to find out how good Bradford is. A shored up o line and a legit big plar receiver in Tavon Austin.

I think people are about to find out how good Bradford is. A shored up o line and a legit big plar receiver in Tavon Austin.
- Bieksa#3

Maybe, but I don't think they'll make the post-season unless the Seahawks implode.

The Cards, Rams, Dolphins and Browns are all next tier teams. They all have excellent D's but are missing pieces offensively. The Rams are going to struggle with their strength of schedule IMO. The Dolphins will be a strong team next year once they fix that O-line.
- golfingsince

The Browns have a superbowl defence but a typical Brown's offence. Weeden sucks and Dancerson is a bust.

The Browns have a superbowl defence but a typical Brown's offence. Weeden sucks and Dancerson is a bust.
- DTF69

The browns should trade a 2nd for Foles

The Browns have a superbowl defence but a typical Brown's offence. Weeden sucks and Dancerson is a bust.
- DTF69

Weedon sucks, but they just need him to manage a game. Once Gordon comes back that should become easier. They could use a some size at receiver. Richardson is a top 5 back in the league.

Weedon sucks, but they just need him to manage a game. Once Gordon comes back that should become easier. They could use a some size at receiver. Richardson is a top 5 back in the league.
- golfingsince

Nope. Dancerson sucks.

They need hands at receiver more than size.

Weedon sucks, but they just need him to manage a game. Once Gordon comes back that should become easier. They could use a some size at receiver. Richardson is a top 5 back in the league.
- golfingsince

Agreed, he needs to be Trent Dilfer or Alex Smith

Nope. Dancerson sucks.

They need hands at receiver more than size.
- DTF69

Bess has great hands. Benjamin sucks, Gordon is a big time playmaker.

But they're all short.