Yeah, that one does look kinda bad.

But seriously, he's not a serial diver—he does that when there isn't even a defender around.

He falls a lot. Fast skater, but not strong on his skates.
- Fosco

Like I said......

If that had of happened with a leafs jersey on, it would of been 5 and a game...

Raymond could of hurt himself there, did you see the air he got when he lept *ahem* was tripped?

Bozak

Nah, I do it for rhe dirty looks.
- UsernameUnknown

Become a canucks fan then if you like that.....

Pretty sure Kulemin played RW last season, but okay.
- Talkshowhost

Kulemin played everywhere last year.

You probably had his poster in your room in 2010
- Garnie

No poster.

But I was definitely a fan when he was producing...for that season and a half.

He started getting timid even before the back injury. There are still flashes of the player he was when he put up 53 points, but it doesn't last for more than a handful of games.

Was very frustrating watching him start a promising rush and then swing his purse at the puck just off the boards inside the offensive zone.

If he wasn't too scared to make a move towards the net he could still be an effective offensive player.

Still a half decent player for the right price and is effective on the PK.

Wish him the best, but the Canucks already have a few 2nd/3rd line tweeners that play a similar style.

Become a canucks fan then if you like that.....
- Sheppy99

There's a dfference between dirty looks and getting stabbed repeatedly for others joy.

I draw the line. I wish to be respected.

Kulemin played everywhere last year.
- Leafland

Eh, 77% he was with Grabo, and 53 % of the time with Mac A.
http://www.behindthenet.c...0+21+22+23+24+25+26+27+28


But yeah, if he slots back in on LW then you're right.

Your third best left winger is Fraser Mclaren right now.
- Talkshowhost

YETI

No poster.

But I was definitely a fan when he was producing...for that season and a half.

He started getting timid even before the back injury. There are still flashes of the player he was when he put up 53 points, but it doesn't last for more than a handful of games.

Was very frustrating watching him start a promising rush and then swing his purse at the puck just off the boards inside the offensive zone.

If he wasn't too scared to make a move towards the net he could still be an effective offensive player.

Still a half decent player for the right price and is effective on the PK.

Wish him the best, but the Canucks already have a few 2nd/3rd line tweeners that play a similar style.
- Fosco

That's a very accurate description. He simply disappeared, and stopped going anywhere near the net. He's nothing more than cheap depth...but he's no better than Lombardi at this point.

Eh, 77% he was with Grabo, and 53 % of the time with Mac A.
http://www.behindthenet.c...0+21+22+23+24+25+26+27+28


But yeah, if he slots back in on LW then you're right.
- Talkshowhost

What position is Eugene Melnyk playing this year for your team? Checking line center?

No poster.

But I was definitely a fan when he was producing...for that season and a half.

He started getting timid even before the back injury. There are still flashes of the player he was when he put up 53 points, but it doesn't last for more than a handful of games.

Was very frustrating watching him start a promising rush and then swing his purse at the puck just off the boards inside the offensive zone.

If he wasn't too scared to make a move towards the net he could still be an effective offensive player.

Still a half decent player for the right price and is effective on the PK.

Wish him the best, but the Canucks already have a few 2nd/3rd line tweeners that play a similar style.
- Fosco

Good thing we didn't keep Obyrne

What position is Eugene Melnyk playing this year for your team? Checking line center?
- Sheppy99

Holy bud, you're life must be wicked.

Holy bud, you're life must be wicked.
- Talkshowhost

Sens going to be fight for a spot themselves - maybe they should give Raymond a shot.

Holy bud, you're life must be wicked.
- Talkshowhost

Yes it is, I know how to use contractions and everything......

Yes it is, I know how to use contractions and everything......
- Sheppy99

Balls.

That's a very accurate description. He simply disappeared, and stopped going anywhere near the net. He's nothing more than cheap depth...but he's no better than Lombardi at this point.
- djamon

(frank) I knew it, MacArthur in disguise!!!!!

Sens going to be fight for a spot themselves - maybe they should give Raymond a shot.
- Garnie

Too much forward depth as it is.

you're thinking of kessel.

You don't watch a lot of hockey do you?
- Sheppy99

Eh, 77% he was with Grabo, and 53 % of the time with Mac A.
http://www.behindthenet.c...0+21+22+23+24+25+26+27+28


But yeah, if he slots back in on LW then you're right.
- Talkshowhost

That's two years ago, like i said, he played everywhere last year.

That's two years ago, like i said, he played everywhere last year.
- Leafland

Whoops, you're right. My bad.

Either means Kadri wont be signed because he's asking for too much.



Or someone like Kulemin will be traded and Raymond will be signed to a cheap contract.
- jbold

Or it's just a tryout?

Too much forward depth as it is.
- Talkshowhost

Whoops, you're right. My bad.
- Talkshowhost

Meh, Kulemin can do anything.

So him, big joe and colton are battling for a spot?
- SameOld

Orr likely already has his spot. Carlisle wouldn't have played him as much as he did last year if he didn't like him. Raymond isn't a fourth liner so it wouldn't be Orr's spot he'd be taking.

I guess getting Raymond could make up for losing out on the Luongo sweepstakes.

Orr likely already has his spot. Carlisle wouldn't have played him as much as he did last year if he didn't like him. Raymond isn't a fourth liner so it wouldn't be Orr's spot he'd be taking.
- Jeffmt

Raymond doesn't have to have a spot on the team to make the team. He could easily get a 2 way contract and just be purely back up which I don't mind at all. A winger goes down with an injury and Raymond could slide right in.