Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Ian Esplen: Rewind: The '07 Draft
Author Message
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t
Joined: 07.16.2006

Aug 1 @ 2:20 AM ET
Shes close to early twenties. Close enough
- RF_4eva

bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: The Clit Whisperer
Joined: 10.22.2011

Aug 1 @ 2:21 AM ET
Shes close to early twenties. Close enough
- RF_4eva


here you go son, natural beauty...

sanfordnson
Edmonton Oilers
Location: BiggButtz
Joined: 03.11.2010

Aug 1 @ 2:21 AM ET
I edited my last post to include:

I hate technology. Robs the common man of the thrill of the natural beauty. Anyone remember the chick from Cool Hand Luke?

- bloatedmosquito

One of my all time favorite movies. Not sure which chick you mean though since that movie, although fantastic, was a sausage fest.

You're not thinking of The Colour Of Money are you?

EDIT: Never mind. Thanks for the reminder.
RF_4eva
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Fosco's son, BC
Joined: 09.11.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:22 AM ET

- annoyance_101

Im probably the youngest lad here, so don't be surprised.
Btw, private schools are messed up
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver
Joined: 06.14.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:22 AM ET
I'm not trying to justify what Bert did. My original response was to a poster suggesting that Cooke was the first guy to go after Moore, when in fact Moore declined everyone else and then hand picked Cooke.
- golfingsince


No. Nobody suggested he was the 1st to go after Cooke, just one of the 1st. It happened off the 1st face off of the game Moore was on the ice for. My point was that Cooke shouldn't have challenged him. The code requires him to fight. If you want him also to lose them he should have waited for May, who was already in the box for fighting and hadn't seen the ice yet at the same time as Moore.
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver
Joined: 06.14.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:23 AM ET
Moore grabbed Cooke. Did you watch the game?
- golfingsince


I was at the game.
RF_4eva
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Fosco's son, BC
Joined: 09.11.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:26 AM ET
here you go son, natural beauty...


- bloatedmosquito

KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver
Joined: 06.14.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:27 AM ET
You're missing the point entirely...Moore declined everyone except Cooke...everyone on that team wanted to knock his head in...(bad choice of words i suppose considering what followed) but none the less...
- annoyance_101


So every other player on the team challenged him that game and he turned them all down?
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Aug 1 @ 2:28 AM ET
No. Nobody suggested he was the 1st to go after Cooke, just one of the 1st. It happened off the 1st face off of the game Moore was on the ice for. My point was that Cooke shouldn't have challenged him. The code requires him to fight. If you want him also to lose them he should have waited for May, who was already in the box for fighting and hadn't seen the ice yet at the same time as Moore.
- KB3Point0


you sure?

The biggest problem was that Matt Cooke (worst fighter outside of maybe Semin) was the 1st to challenge Moore to a fight, and Moore won. That enraged the fans and the team even more. Then Bertuzzi went full retard. You don't ever go full retard!
- KB3Point0
golfingsince
Location: This message is Marwood approved!
Joined: 11.30.2011

Aug 1 @ 2:28 AM ET
I was at the game.
- KB3Point0


We all were.....
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t
Joined: 07.16.2006

Aug 1 @ 2:29 AM ET
No. Nobody suggested he was the 1st to go after Cooke, just one of the 1st. It happened off the 1st face off of the game Moore was on the ice for. My point was that Cooke shouldn't have challenged him. The code requires him to fight. If you want him also to lose them he should have waited for May, who was already in the box for fighting and hadn't seen the ice yet at the same time as Moore.
- KB3Point0


COOKE DIDNT CHALLENGE HIM, HE CHALLENGED COOKE
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver
Joined: 06.14.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:29 AM ET
Moore grabbed Cooke, that is the only person on the entire team that Moore wanted to fight...had Cooke declined, there would have been NO fight in that entire game, and it would have ended the same way...with Bertuzzi bashing his head in...the cooke fight changed NOTHING...
- annoyance_101


Moore might have grabbed Cooke, but Cooke challenged him using his, you know, words!
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t
Joined: 07.16.2006

Aug 1 @ 2:30 AM ET
So every other player on the team challenged him that game and he turned them all down?
- KB3Point0


Now I know that you didn't even watch the game in question...he turned down everyone that challenged him yes and went after Cooke because thats all he thought he could handle...watch the game and then comment
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver
Joined: 06.14.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:31 AM ET
Moore grabbed Cooke, that is the only person on the entire team that Moore wanted to fight...had Cooke declined, there would have been NO fight in that entire game, and it would have ended the same way...with Bertuzzi bashing his head in...the cooke fight changed NOTHING...
- annoyance_101


The problem is this. You, and many other fans (and obviously Bert) don't care about "the code." You care about vengeance and you use the code as an excuse to get that vengeance. Don't hide behind the code. Just admit you wanted him to get hurt for what he did to Naslund and that'll be that.
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t
Joined: 07.16.2006

Aug 1 @ 2:32 AM ET
Moore might have grabbed Cooke, but Cooke challenged him using his, you know, words!
- KB3Point0


but anyways, i'm done with this, you've now made it insanely obvious you didnt even watch the game...
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t
Joined: 07.16.2006

Aug 1 @ 2:33 AM ET
The problem is this. You, and many other fans (and obviously Bert) don't care about "the code." You care about vengeance and you use the code as an excuse to get that vengeance. Don't hide behind the code. Just admit you wanted him to get hurt for what he did to Naslund and that'll be that.
- KB3Point0


I wanted him to fight anyone else that challenged him...and not grab someone from the lollipop guild...aka cooke
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver
Joined: 06.14.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:34 AM ET
Now I know that you didn't even watch the game in question...he turned down everyone that challenged him yes and went after Cooke because thats all he thought he could handle...watch the game and then comment
- annoyance_101


Yeah, he turned them all down AFTER he fought Cooke. The fight happened 6:30 into the game.

I was at the game. The energy in the building played a large part in the eventual incident.
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver
Joined: 06.14.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:36 AM ET
This never happened. Moore grabbed Cooke after the draw. We are talking about the incident, which just happens to be spread over 2 games.
- golfingsince


No, you are talking about the incident. I said from the get go that Cooke should not have challenged Moore if he wasn't going to win the fight (and yes, he did).
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Aug 1 @ 2:37 AM ET
Cooke was probably the 10th to challenge Moore. He was the only one Moore accepted.
- golfingsince


Yeah, I was going to say the same thing. Brad May I think was the first, but that was so long ago I may be misremembering.

Re: Bloated's perspective. I think that if Naslund was in a position AT THE TIME to stand up for himself than it is warranted that he fight his own battle. But that he had a shoulder injury and while it wasn't listed, I'm betting he had a pretty nasty concussion, getting in a fight probably wasn't high on the list of smart things to do. To me, getting in a fight with someone a month (or more) later because he cheap shotted you isn't really standing up for yourself, it's more retribution, and there is just as good a chance that he gets injured again in that situation.
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t
Joined: 07.16.2006

Aug 1 @ 2:38 AM ET
Yeah, he turned them all down AFTER he fought Cooke. The fight happened 6:30 into the game.

I was at the game. The energy in the building played a large part in the eventual incident.

- KB3Point0


Yes he thought he would try and get his fight over by hand picking a munchkin that doesnt fight...man up and fight someone that will actually address the teams problem with you...
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver
Joined: 06.14.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:40 AM ET
you sure?
- golfingsince


Well, I definitely know he was one of the first! I honestly would not be able to tell you if he was the first. Far from turning down the whole team though. He might have turned down one other before he and Cooke went. And yes, Cooke challenging him allows him to fight Cooke as part of the code.
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver
Joined: 06.14.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:40 AM ET
COOKE DIDNT CHALLENGE HIM, HE CHALLENGED COOKE
- annoyance_101


Nope. He grabbed Cooke, but Cooke challenged him to fight.
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Vancouver
Joined: 06.14.2012

Aug 1 @ 2:41 AM ET
We all were.....
- golfingsince


Then you should know better.
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t
Joined: 07.16.2006

Aug 1 @ 2:44 AM ET
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoExcpIdPZ0 moore grabbed on to cooke, cooke had to grab his barrings...the announcer even said it...meaning cooke was not ready...he was far from challenging him...
Jurco_28
Atlanta Thrashers
Location: 51st state-Canada or Puerto Rico?
Joined: 06.29.2013

Aug 1 @ 2:50 AM ET
when is luongos number going to be retired?
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19  Next