|
|
For flying into the captain? as often as the team wants you to...essentially you're their female dog for that game...and his biggest mistake was not fighting bertuzzi - annoyance_101
Thats BS. I dont blame him at all. He fought once and it shoudl have been over. If that was the other way around and burrows gave a cheap shot and had his career ended we would be going crazy. |
|
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t Joined: 07.16.2006
|
|
|
|
|
I'm afraid not.
Smurfs-A-Joke was banned for the next year and a half when I got here. I added another year. I've also tagged his IP, so any new accounts will be getting watched. Sorry for the delay. - micah555
|
|
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t Joined: 07.16.2006
|
|
|
Thats BS. I dont blame him at all. He fought once and it shoudl have been over. If that was the other way around and burrows gave a cheap shot and had his career ended we would be going crazy. - Bluechip23
He's gotta man up if he's gonna play superman into Naslund...fighting cooke is not manning up, its taking the easy way out and thinking thats the end of it |
|
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver Joined: 06.14.2012
|
|
|
For flying into the captain? as often as the team wants you to...essentially you're their female dog for that game...and his biggest mistake was not fighting bertuzzi - annoyance_101
Completely wrong. The code is that he has to man up and fight due to his transgressions. If the Canucks didn't want him fighting Matt Cooke then Crawford shouldn't have lined Cooke up beside him and Cooke shouldn't have challenged him. The code is not that he has to fight until he loses. It isn't the Thunderdome. |
|
|
|
He's gotta man up if he's gonna play superman into Naslund...fighting cooke is not manning up, its taking the easy way out and thinking thats the end of it - annoyance_101
I have seen that hit over and over again. When are we going to look objectively at that play. NAslund lunges into him and leaves himself exposed. YES the hit was dirty but it wasnt intentional and there isnt any evidence that moore is a dirty player.
I respectfully disagree that he has to fight every person. What happened when Marchand low bridged us in the cup final. Thats a way dirty hit than what moore did. What happend when Keith elbowed Dank. Much worse than what moore did. Where were all the fights then? |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
Why do you have a problem with one and not the other? The results were the exact same. 2 players careers ended due to brain injuries from illegal, intentional and malicious hits to the head. - KB3Point0
Here's a hint; it comes down to who delivered the hit. I believe Bure was within his full rights to deliver that elbow. Bert was not. Bert had no reason to be involved. Naslund needed to take care of his own business. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Talking about the Bertuzzi game, not immediately after the Naslund hit. This is a conversation about Cooke, not the Naslund hit. - KB3Point0
You can't really talk about one game without the other. They're kind of intertwined. |
|
RF_4eva
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Fosco's son, BC Joined: 09.11.2012
|
|
|
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver Joined: 06.14.2012
|
|
|
He's gotta man up if he's gonna play superman into Naslund...fighting cooke is not manning up, its taking the easy way out and thinking thats the end of it - annoyance_101
Then that's on Cooke for not beating him. Exactly my point. That is the code. |
|
|
|
Then that's on Cooke for not beating him. Exactly my point. That is the code. - KB3Point0
Exactly. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
I have seen that hit over and over again. When are we going to look objectively at that play. NAslund lunges into him and leaves himself exposed. YES the hit was dirty but it wasnt intentional and there isnt any evidence that moore is a dirty player.
I respectfully disagree that he has to fight every person. What happened when Marchand low bridged us in the cup final. Thats a way dirty hit than what moore did. What happend when Keith elbowed Dank. Much worse than what moore did. Where were all the fights then? - Bluechip23
Nothing, it happened the following season. Marchand was ejected from the game and we haven't played the Bruins since........ |
|
KB3Point0
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Vancouver Joined: 06.14.2012
|
|
|
I have seen that hit over and over again. When are we going to look objectively at that play. NAslund lunges into him and leaves himself exposed. YES the hit was dirty but it wasnt intentional and there isnt any evidence that moore is a dirty player.
I respectfully disagree that he has to fight every person. What happened when Marchand low bridged us in the cup final. Thats a way dirty hit than what moore did. What happend when Keith elbowed Dank. Much worse than what moore did. Where were all the fights then? - Bluechip23
Moore saw Naslund without the puck and hit him while he was in a vulnerable position. He targeted the head and knocked him unconscious. He had a straight line to the puck that he avoided. Textbook dirty hit, but certainly not the worst in recent years (Richards, Cooke, etc). |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Completely wrong. The code is that he has to man up and fight due to his transgressions. If the Canucks didn't want him fighting Matt Cooke then Crawford shouldn't have lined Cooke up beside him and Cooke shouldn't have challenged him. The code is not that he has to fight until he loses. It isn't the Thunderdome. - KB3Point0
The code isn't that you get to pick and choose who you fight or else anybody that got dirty with Gretzky would have chosen to fight Kurri.......not Semenko. Nice try though. |
|
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t Joined: 07.16.2006
|
|
|
I have seen that hit over and over again. When are we going to look objectively at that play. NAslund lunges into him and leaves himself exposed. YES the hit was dirty but it wasnt intentional and there isnt any evidence that moore is a dirty player.
I respectfully disagree that he has to fight every person. What happened when Marchand low bridged us in the cup final. Thats a way dirty hit than what moore did. What happend when Keith elbowed Dank. Much worse than what moore did. Where were all the fights then? - Bluechip23
Well Keith...being suspended and all, the league took action, which honestly I think is what should have happened with the moore/naslund hit, if they suspended him for the game against the canucks when bertuzzi was obviously out for revenge, it would not have happened... |
|
Fosco
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Marwood's Beotch, BC Joined: 12.08.2007
|
|
|
She's cute and very quirky. But would you call her hot? I have yet to see an image of that I would consider hot. - bloatedmosquito
I think she's smoking hot, but yes, in a bit of a quirky way, which I like.
I've seen a handful of regulars on this board share that sentiment.
Have you ever seen her on her show at all? |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
How many times do you have to man up? - KB3Point0
You don't get to decline a bunch of times and then pick Cooke as your partner. You have to take your lumps for doing what he did. He refused, it went really bad. |
|
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t Joined: 07.16.2006
|
|
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
Then that's on Cooke for not beating him. Exactly my point. That is the code. - KB3Point0
So in other words if somebody beats up your sister they don't have to fight you, they can fight your mom instead if they so choose. |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
Exactly. - Bluechip23
yeah, I don't think Moore had to fight until he lost. My point is that Cooke, Bertuzzi, and May should have stayed out of it and Naslund should have delivered equal retribution. Eye for an eye kind of stuff.
I would have loved to have seen Naslund put an elbow through Moore's face. Just like Bure did. I would have LOVED it. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t Joined: 07.16.2006
|
|
|
Moore refused EVERYONE then went for Cooke. It's like we're pretending Cooke was the only willing partner....... - golfingsince
The whole team wanted his head...yet he went for Cooke? the least likely to give him an absolutely pounding...go against Brad May or Todd Bertuzzi, you'd get whats deservedly coming to you...Hand picking Cooke is the worst thing he could have done... |
|
sanfordnson
Edmonton Oilers |
|
|
Location: BiggButtz Joined: 03.11.2010
|
|
|
The code isn't that you get to pick and choose who you fight or else anybody that got dirty with Gretzky would have chosen to fight Kurri.......not Semenko. Nice try though. - golfingsince
Cementko didn't give them a choice. Sometimes they'd get off with a warning. Different situation entirely. Semenko had no illusions about his role. The Canucks didn't really have a guy like him around.
Probs should have ended after Cooke though. Not Moores problem that the toughest guy he fought was Cooke. Hoe many guys should he have to fight before it's considered settled? |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: The Clit Whisperer Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
I think she's smoking hot, but yes, in a bit of a quirky way, which I like.
I've seen a handful of regulars on this board share that sentiment.
Have you ever seen her on her show at all? - Fosco
never seen her show except for commercials for it. I also think she does hair dye commercials (or maybe shampoo). She just looks so damn awkward. |
|
annoyance_101
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I am not a troll, I am not a t Joined: 07.16.2006
|
|
|
Cementko didn't give them a choice. Sometimes they'd get off with a warning. Different situation entirely. Semenko had no illusions about his role. The Canucks didn't really have a guy like him around.
Probs should have ended after Cooke though. Not Moores problem that the toughest guy he fought was Cooke. Hoe many guys should he have to fight before it's considered settled? - sanfordnson
Yes, that actually was his fault, that is the only guy that he didnt refuse to fight...he refused everyone else...fighting cooke is like fighting my 10 year old nephew...in fact Id venture to say my nephew could beat the snot out of that punk... sorry i can't stand cooke...or moore |
|