Didn't I (frank)ing tell you this was a discussion about Friday the 13th. Stay on topic you (frank)ing zorch !!!!!


- Reveen

I actually liked the re-make. Jason was way more aggressive and not all stiff like frankenstein monster (with an axe). Plus some pretty good nudity.

after game 3 loss chicago blogger throw boland under the bus for trade. apparently 2nd or 3rd round pick.
- deks1

Deal.

Cant wait for his DUI or Britney melt down. Im outta here going to play nhl 13 and win the cup with the oilers lol C ya later if Richards makes a blog 2night. Big probs to everyone on this site a lot more hockey talk lately instead of arguing.
- time2produce

Looking for new material for your Spank Bank ?

Does that make Taylor the odd man out?
- Jeropotato

try the "lucky pierre"

I actually liked the re-make. Jason was way more aggressive and not all stiff like frankenstein monster (with an axe). Plus some pretty good nudity.
- Jeropotato

It was basically a 90 minute supernatural episode...

Somewhat,sure. But if 5 teams were interested are they less interested now?
- Jeropotato

They might still be interested but at a discounted price than before he said that

I would take either, BPA is the way to go at #7.
- Jeropotato

I would take either, BPA is the way to go at #7.
- Jeropotato

I feel that the only player that would make a difference at #7 is Monahan. Lindholm is too much of the same that we have, and Nurse is just another prospect on defense. Monahan will probably be gone by then though because Calgary sucks.

Realistically, I don't think that the price tag is too much to move up 2 spots, yet the long term effect would be substantial.

I feel that the only player that would make a difference at #7 is Monahan. Lindholm is too much of the same that we have, and Nurse is just another prospect on defense. Monahan will probably be gone by then though because Calgary sucks.

Realistically, I don't think that the price tag is too much to move up 2 spots, yet the long term effect would be substantial.
- TomKlassen

I wouldn't give up more than a 2nd, but yeah,Nish or Barkov seem like the real deal. I would have Barkov play another year in Europe or maybe AHL though. Being a winger,I don't mind if Nish makes the team at camp.

It was basically a 90 minute supernatural episode...
- Reveen

Never watched that show ever...any good or totally gay?

try the "lucky pierre"
- Reveen

Is that anything like the dutch rudder? I never heard of it.

try the "lucky pierre"
- Reveen

Nevermind.
http://www.phrases.org.uk...oard/33/messages/458.html

I wouldn't give up more than a 2nd, but yeah,Nish or Barkov seem like the real deal. I would have Barkov play another year in Europe or maybe AHL though. Being a winger,I don't mind if Nish makes the team at camp.
- Jeropotato

I think Barkov is definitely NHL ready now, but that's my own opinion.

As for value, while I do agree that it is fair value to give them a second round pick, word is that Carolina is looking for a way to get better now. My guess is they're looking for a roster player.

Considering the risk they took on Semin, I don't think it's too far fetched that maybe Hemsky could be offered, assuming we swallowed half his salary.

I don't know about you but I believe a player of Hemsky's caliber at 2.5 million dollars is a bargain.

I think Barkov is definitely NHL ready now, but that's my own opinion.

As for value, while I do agree that it is fair value to give them a second round pick, word is that Carolina is looking for a way to get better now. My guess is they're looking for a roster player.

Considering the risk they took on Semin, I don't think it's too far fetched that maybe Hemsky could be offered, assuming we swallowed half his salary.

I don't know about you but I believe a player of Hemsky's caliber at 2.5 million dollars is a bargain.
- TomKlassen

Oh (frank) yeah. If we didn't have 2 similar,but younger (and clearly better) RW's in Yak and Ebs,I would have no problem keeping him.

I feel that the only player that would make a difference at #7 is Monahan. Lindholm is too much of the same that we have, and Nurse is just another prospect on defense. Monahan will probably be gone by then though because Calgary sucks.

Realistically, I don't think that the price tag is too much to move up 2 spots, yet the long term effect would be substantial.
- TomKlassen

Nurse may be another prospect on defense but he's an elite prospect that is better than any of the ones we currently have in our system. He would also make it possible to use one of the guys we've drafted already in a trade package for the big winger we need. Too much defensive depth isn't a bad thing.

Nurse may be another prospect on defense but he's an elite prospect that is better than any of the ones we currently have in our system. He would also make it possible to use one of the guys we've drafted already in a trade package for the big winger we need. Too much defensive depth isn't a bad thing.
- Ihatebrianburke

Really? Is he ahead of Klefbom and Marincin? I will garauntee that Mrincin plays a minimum of 40 NHL games next season.

Nurse may be another prospect on defense but he's an elite prospect that is better than any of the ones we currently have in our system. He would also make it possible to use one of the guys we've drafted already in a trade package for the big winger we need. Too much defensive depth isn't a bad thing.
- Ihatebrianburke

Of course Klefbom is also an elite prospect on the back end; I've heard of people suggesting Klefbom being in the top 5 in defensive prospects already drafted. Schultz is elite talent, I know that sounds homerish, but normal defensemen don't get 27 points in their first 48 NHL games. He could very well become the next Karrlson.

Of course Klefbom is also an elite prospect on the back end; I've heard of people suggesting Klefbom being in the top 5 in defensive prospects already drafted. Schultz is elite talent, I know that sounds homerish, but normal defensemen don't get 27 points in their first 48 NHL games. He could very well become the next Karrlson.
- TomKlassen

Oh yeah, Schultz will be a legit #1 I think, but he needs a Seabrook type as a partner. Maybe that will be Klef eventually, maybe Nurse,or maybe we go after that guy in free agency or by trade one of these summers.As for this draft, I would be okay with the BPA,regardless of position.

Oh yeah, Schultz will be a legit #1 I think, but he needs a Seabrook type as a partner. Maybe that will be Klef eventually, maybe Nurse,or maybe we go after that guy in free agency or by trade one of these summers.As for this draft, I would be okay with the BPA,regardless of position.
- Jeropotato

I feel that if we stay at the #7 spot, we'll get either Monahan or Lindholm. I just don't see us picking Nurse under any circumstances.

I feel that if we stay at the #7 spot, we'll get either Monahan or Lindholm. I just don't see us picking Nurse under any circumstances.
- TomKlassen

I agree.And not as though Lindholm is a Hobbit,either. He wont be that beastly Center everyone is talking about, but a solid 6'0, 200lb'er is big enough.

A year from now there will a poopload of good D available in free agency as well. Even an older guy for a few years would help provide a gap for Marincin and Klefbom to develope, and provide depth once they do.

Look at these outstanding talents!

Dion Phaneuf,Jay Bouwmeester,Nik Hjarlmarsson,Brooks Orpik,Danny Syvret,Dennis Seidenberg,Kris Letang,Andrei Markov,Dan Boyle...sure,most will be extended before then,but if the team shows improvement we could interest one of them.

Didn't I (frank)ing tell you this was a discussion about Friday the 13th. Stay on topic you (frank)ing zorch !!!!!


- Reveen

Did you like the re-makes of Halloween? Most people seem to dislike them, but I (frank)ing loved them.

It was basically a 90 minute supernatural episode...
- Reveen

Never watched that show ever...any good or totally gay?
- Jeropotato

Really good AND totally gay

I think Barkov is definitely NHL ready now, but that's my own opinion.

As for value, while I do agree that it is fair value to give them a second round pick, word is that Carolina is looking for a way to get better now. My guess is they're looking for a roster player.

Considering the risk they took on Semin, I don't think it's too far fetched that maybe Hemsky could be offered, assuming we swallowed half his salary.

I don't know about you but I believe a player of Hemsky's caliber at 2.5 million dollars is a bargain.
- TomKlassen

I think with one year left, Hemsky will go with his current contract. There are not many decent forwards on the market and guys are going to be over paid. I think as more players extend before the draft, Hemsky's one year won't look so bad. Especially to a team that wants to improve now.

I think moving up would help the team most. If we can get a rookie that can fill one of our bottom 6 spots, we have one less position to worry about. Signing a Dman that doesn't play seems pointless with where the team is at. There is talk of Edmonton showing interest in Horvat who is ranked in the top 10 with some scouts.

Deal.
- Jeropotato

100% they wont do it though, cant blame one player when its 2 0 and Toew had 5 shots. Wheres the I WANT A NEW CAPTAIN BLOG? Good idea with Horcoff gone who gets the C Hall or Gagner?