Good old PeckerFan
- dadeadhead

I like pecafanfan better

I like pecafanfan better


- homiedclown

I miss Boos.

Yet Van had 1 less point in 6 less games played than Nash.
- Homer

And how many scoreless games did Nash have compared to vanek?

I think Miller is better than his stats show.
- Homer

+1

so now he isn't skilled?

Have you seen his shootout goals? Van scores plenty of filthy goals, I'd rather have a guy who can score any way. Great deke, great shot or dirty goals.
- Homer

I think Vanek has the talent to do what nash does

I also think Vanek is a lazy player

I still say flip him to RW and put him in the slot
perhaps he would be in better position to get back and play some D then

I miss Boos.
- dadeadhead

agreed


get ripped, boos, ray and 89 in here and this room would be more fun

I think Vanek has the talent to do what nash does

I also think Vanek is a lazy player

I still say flip him to RW and put him in the slot
perhaps he would be in better position to get back and play some D then
- homiedclown

Vanek has the talent, but doesn't use his big body like Nash does. Nash brings it and I will bet is a complete monster in the playoffs.

Also Nash is a much better skater

I think Vanek has the talent to do what nash does

I also think Vanek is a lazy player

I still say flip him to RW and put him in the slot
perhaps he would be in better position to get back and play some D then
- homiedclown

he does do what Nash does production wise.. I dont care that he doesnt hit, he never has, not his game.

And how many scoreless games did Nash have compared to vanek?
- sbroads24

again, why does that matter.

For every game Van went scoreless more than Nash did Van had more games where he scored multiple points than Nash did. Why is that less important?

he does do what Nash does production wise.. I dont care that he doesnt hit, he never has, not his game.
- Homer

where did that come from?

he is a bunny sucker and does not come back and back check

he does do what Nash does production wise.. I dont care that he doesnt hit, he never has, not his game.
- Homer

So because Roy never hit, and it wasn't part of his game, Roy is by far a better than Ott because of the points he scores right? The elements that Nash brings that Vanek does not is part of the reason he is a better player

Also Nash is a much better skater
- sbroads24

this

Vanek has the talent, but doesn't use his big body like Nash does. Nash brings it and I will bet is a complete monster in the playoffs.

Also Nash is a much better skater
- sbroads24

his body isnt as big as nash's and Nash is not a "much" better skater.

And how many scoreless games did Nash have compared to vanek?
- sbroads24

Math wasn't sposed to be involved in thinking tonight.

again, why does that matter.

For every game Van went scoreless more than Nash did Van had more games where he scored multiple points than Nash did. Why is that less important?
- Homer

19-5-2 when Nash scored.

12-8-2 when Vanek scored.

When Nash scored, it mattered more than when Vanek scored.

So because Roy never hit, and it wasn't part of his game, Roy is by far a better than Ott because of the points he scores right? The elements that Nash brings that Vanek does not is part of the reason he is a better player
- sbroads24

Ott and Roy are totally different players...Van and Nash are not.

again, why does that matter.

For every game Van went scoreless more than Nash did Van had more games where he scored multiple points than Nash did. Why is that less important?
- Homer

You do realize the reasons you tell us Ott is just as good a player as Roy is the exact reasons I'm saying Nash is better than Vanek right?

his body isnt as big as nash's and Nash is not a "much" better skater.
- Homer

6ft 4 219
6ft 2 205

both have some size and meat on them

19-5-2 when Nash scored.

12-8-2 when Vanek scored.

When Nash scored, it mattered more than when Vanek scored.
- theblueandgold

this

19-5-2 when Nash scored.

12-8-2 when Vanek scored.

When Nash scored, it mattered more than when Vanek scored.
- theblueandgold

got a point and scoring are different fist of all.

Second, Nash was on a better team.

got a point and scoring are different fist of all.

Second, Nash was on a better team.
- Homer

if the goalies were flipped, would the gap be closer then 8 points between the two teams?

got a point and scoring are different fist of all.

Second, Nash was on a better team.
- Homer[/quote]


Yet Vanek was on a better team for the last 6 years but you want to bring up +/-

You do realize the reasons you tell us Ott is just as good a player as Roy is the exact reasons I'm saying Nash is better than Vanek right?
- sbroads24

Nash is better than Vanek, just not by the miles you guys (some of you guys) think he is. That's all I'm saying.

You do realize the reasons you tell us Ott is just as good a player as Roy is the exact reasons I'm saying Nash is better than Vanek right?
- sbroads24

Level 1 - Crosby
Level 2 - Stamkos, Malkin, Ovechkin, Sedin's, Toews
Level 3 - Kane, Hossa, Kovalchuk, Getzlaf, St Louis, Giroux, Kopitar, Nash
Level 4 - Gaborik, Carter, Vanek, Kessel

(although THIS year, I'd bump Kessel up a level)

Sound right?