Watch the video, then comment. I've posted the video. Look at where Scrivens is.
- faceto27

Dude, we've seen the goal. Posting the video doesn't prove your point. He wasn't out of position. (Coming form a goalie). He was where he was supposed to be.

Dude, we've seen the goal. Posting the video doesn't prove your point. He wasn't out of position. (Coming form a goalie). He was where he was supposed to be.
- burn

If you truly watched the video, then you would see, his entire body is to the right of the crease. He then looks over his left shoulder. Look at where he is on his knees.

No way he is supposed to be there.

Dude, we've seen the goal. Posting the video doesn't prove your point. He wasn't out of position. (Coming form a goalie). He was where he was supposed to be.
- burn

I don't agree but it wasn't the game - he overplayed it a touch, the puck was going wide if he stays a little more positioned he has a chance to save it. But who cares the team has stunk for a few games. Not gonna win to much getting outshot 3 to 1 IMHO

Luongo would have saved it.
- Atomic Wedgie

Don't even Luon-go there Wedgie

Watch the video, then comment. I've posted the video. Look at where Scrivens is.
- faceto27

i watched the game.. and quite frankly i dont care where scrivens is

he played the shot correctly

if he hadnt gone over and it didnt deflect it might of gone in short side and then you'd be hating on him for not playing the angle

anyways, i am done with this convo. blaming a goalie for a deflected goal is just stupid. sorry.

i watched the game.. and quite frankly i dont care where scrivens is

he played the shot correctly

if he hadnt gone over and it didnt deflect it might of gone in short side and then you'd be hating on him for not playing the angle

anyways, i am done with this convo. blaming a goalie for a deflected goal is just stupid. sorry.
- Dozzer

Exactly it want a game changer that's for sure. The leafs were horrendous

i watched the game.. and quite frankly i dont care where scrivens is

he played the shot correctly

if he hadnt gone over and it didnt deflect it might of gone in short side and then you'd be hating on him for not playing the angle

anyways, i am done with this convo. blaming a goalie for a deflected goal is just stupid. sorry.
- Dozzer

Wrong doozer........ so wrong.

He is on his knees to the right of the crease. Out of position.

but yes, regardless, the Leafs lost that game even if he had saved it.

Dude, we've seen the goal. Posting the video doesn't prove your point. He wasn't out of position. (Coming form a goalie). He was where he was supposed to be.
- burn

I didn't watch that clip just now, but one thing i notice is Scrivs has a tendency to slide out of position even just slightly on certain plays due in part to the fact he's athletic and pushes a little too strongly (into a glide almost) toward the shooter, especially when he drops into the butterfly rather than using his edge to come to a complete stop, then react accordingly.

Wrong doozer........ so wrong.

He is on his knees to the right of the crease. Out of position.

but yes, regardless, the Leafs lost that game even if he had saved it.
- faceto27

Ok - who cares - its all good -

Exactly it want a game changer that's for sure. The leafs were horrendous
- Garnie

Indeed sucked the big ones this game but dam Ovie is good.

read this, then i saw your location, and it made sense.

friggin hippies.
- Feeling Glucky?

I figure this guy Rysko81 must be a Reiki master or something ridiculous like that.

I am not feeling the healing energy. Only my assvatar has the power to heal.

If you truly watched the video, then you would see, his entire body is to the right of the crease. He then looks over his left shoulder. Look at where he is on his knees.

No way he is supposed to be there.


- faceto27

Sigh..... Yes there is, because that is where the shot was going. He was to the right of his crease and the shot went to the right. He was in position.

That is a fact.

I don't agree but it wasn't the game - he overplayed it a touch, the puck was going wide if he stays a little more positioned he has a chance to save it. But who cares the team has stunk for a few games. Not gonna win to much getting outshot 3 to 1 IMHO
- Garnie

The shot was going right, he was where he was supposed to be. He's not supposed to be in the middle of the net on a shot to the right.

Sigh..... Yes there is, because that is where the shot was going. He was to the right of his crease and the shot went to the right. He was in position.

That is a fact.
- burn

dont bother he doesnt get it

as a goalie you're taught to always play the shot when its going to be close..

Wrong doozer........ so wrong.

He is on his knees to the right of the crease. Out of position.

but yes, regardless, the Leafs lost that game even if he had saved it.
- faceto27

Take it from someone who's played the position. You are wrong. he was in position.

dont bother he doesnt get it

as a goalie you're taught to always play the shot when its going to be close..
- Dozzer

Oh FFS.......

He is clearly OUT of the crease to his right. you are not taught to be outside of the crease.

C'mon man

dont bother he doesnt get it

as a goalie you're taught to always play the shot when its going to be close..
- Dozzer

It's so absurd to be even discussing this. The shot was to the right, she was on the right side of the crease.He was in position 100% without a doubt. It's not even up for debate.

Oh FFS.......

He is clearly OUT of the crease to his right. you are not taught to be outside of the crease.

C'mon man
- faceto27

No he wasn't. He was in position for that shot. Fact.

Clearly never played the position.

i have this overwhelming urge to burn copies of the celestine prophecy right now


- Dozzer

Now there's an interesting read....

It's so absurd to be even discussing this. The shot was to the right, she was on the right side of the crease.He was in position 100% without a doubt. It's not even up for debate.
- burn

He was not on the right side of the crease. He was outside the crease on the right side.

There is a difference.

No he wasn't. He was in position for that shot. Fact.

Clearly never played the position.
- burn

What the (frank) does playing the position have anything to do with this??

I don't need to be a goalie to know that if you are OUTSIDE the crease then you are clearly OUT of position.

Gimme a break

Oh FFS.......

He is clearly OUT of the crease to his right. you are not taught to be outside of the crease.

C'mon man
- faceto27

you've never played net have you?

if its within an arms length of the net (which it was) you are supposed to play it square.

anyways.. got sucked back into this. you seem to think goaltending is all about staying in the crease.. its not.

i dont agree with you so lets leave it at that.

Oh FFS.......

He is clearly OUT of the crease to his right. you are not taught to be outside of the crease.

C'mon man
- faceto27

A) You're wrong
B) You guys don't look like idiots for arguing over this

What the (frank) does playing the position have anything to do with this??

I don't need to be a goalie to know that if you are OUTSIDE the crease then you are clearly OUT of position.

Gimme a break
- faceto27

everytime you say this every person who has played net laughs at you.. just a lil FYI

everytime you say this every person who has played net laughs at you.. just a lil FYI
- Dozzer

A) So are the guys that only played F & D
B) Not just a little