lets not avoid the question. so you think even if the return is right for miller from ANY team...just because darcy doesnt WANT to move him he wont?
- qcstudios

I don't think he moves any of the big 3, I've said it a number of times now, not avoiding the question don't start a problem.

LETS GO PANTHERS...... END THIS PIPE DREAM OF PLAYOFFS FOR THIS PATHETIC EXCUSE FOR A HOCKEY TEAM......
- rapperray

Hahaha...
I'm with ya

I'm hoping we trade as many guys as possible and go like 3-12 after the deadline

" Your" talking about moving 3 very important players on the roster that will make a HUGE difference with this team and the future, i'm sure Darcy is not in full sell mode at all. Doesn't look good when your trying to build a winner and you move 3 guys like that.

I didn't mean you Ray just in general.
- SABRES 89

I know.... If the Sabres were truly sellers there would have been moves by now..... The Brennan trade was just a flat out wiff by Darcy. He truly screwed the pooch on that one....

I don't think he moves any of the big 3, I've said it a number of times now, not avoiding the question don't start a problem.
- SABRES 89

whos starting a problem? i asked a question..is that not allowed on here?

No. They have back to backs this weekend. I think he'll get one of those.
- HonkFortheGoose

Didn't realize they had a back to backer this weekend. Not like me to be so out of touch with this team, even in terms of the schedule.
But yes. You are right Goose. Makes sense of course.

I know.... If the Sabres were truly sellers there would have been moves by now..... The Brennan trade was just a flat out wiff by Darcy. He truly screwed the pooch on that one....
- rapperray

forget the Brennan trade, it means nothing. Most people including myself were willing to put him on waivers and send him back to Rochester.

your comment makes even less sense than his. and because it wasnt an opinion...it was just a dumb thing to say
- qcstudios

Whats' your problem are you just looking to start an argument? lighten up.

whos starting a problem? i asked a question..is that not allowed on here?
- qcstudios

and I answered it, just like I posted earlier, some don't know when to stop.

Been watching Darcy for 15 years..... trust me... all of the assumptions that they will sell big are not likely to come true..... Look for maybe 1 or 2 insignificant moves by Darcy...
- rapperray

name one time in the last 15 years it was dead-ass clear that they needed to be sellers, and had valuable assets worth selling.

Didn't realize they had a back to backer this weekend. Not like me to be so out of touch with this team, even in terms of the schedule.
But yes. You are right Goose. Makes sense of course.
- BuffaloHardHat

Otherwise I would have agreed with you. I only knew they had back to backs because I originally had tickets to both games. I only have Saturday's now.

your comment makes even less sense than his. and because it wasnt an opinion...it was just a dumb thing to say
- qcstudios

So you are the present day expert eh?

forget the Brennan trade, it means nothing. Most people including myself were willing to put him on waivers and send him back to Rochester.
- Sabresfan-365

This^. .....Brennan is not a huge loss.

Whats' your problem are you just looking to start an argument? lighten up.
- SABRES 89

i dont think i have a problem? unless you do?

great game hey

I know.... If the Sabres were truly sellers there would have been moves by now..... The Brennan trade was just a flat out wiff by Darcy. He truly screwed the pooch on that one....
- rapperray

This Darcy and Lindy thing should have taken care of when Pegula bought the team, he set this team back 3 more years IMO by keeping the both of them.

i dont think i have a problem? unless you do?
- qcstudios

you do

Can we call the 21-63-23 line the "Compliance Buyout" line?

name one time in the last 15 years it was dead-ass clear that they needed to be sellers, and had valuable assets worth selling.
- robz228

Easy... The last 2 seasons... It was a waste to think they were actually a competetive team. Should have been big sellers then too

Can we call the 21-63-23 line the "Compliance Buyout" line?
- Pierceme69

Are you implying they should buy out Ennis too?

This Darcy and Lindy thing should have taken care of when Pegula bought the team, he set this team back 3 more years IMO by keeping the both of them.
- SABRES 89

nobody disagrees with that now. but i think its laughable to be angry that they havent traded their whole roster yet. if they dont sell any pieces then raise a hellstorm, but theres no way in hell they arent going to try to move peices for picks and prospects

and I answered it, just like I posted earlier, some don't know when to stop.
- SABRES 89

you didnt really answer the question, it was basically yes or no.

This Darcy and Lindy thing should have taken care of when Pegula bought the team, he set this team back 3 more years IMO by keeping the both of them.
- SABRES 89

Yes he did... The Sabres are at least a 5 year project, from now, because of Pegula's love affair with those 2....

Otherwise I would have agreed with you. I only knew they had back to backs because I originally had tickets to both games. I only have Saturday's now.
- HonkFortheGoose

you do
- SABRES 89

how so? because i have an opinion and you dont agree with it, i have a problem?

Oh Staff! Wide open on the back door and can't score.