Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: No Hearing For Brown On Check "From Behind"
Author Message
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: The centre of the hockey universe
Joined: 07.31.2006

Mar 1 @ 3:16 PM ET
How many errand behind the back no look passes can I guy send before you realize he isn't your number 1?
- MapleLeafsFTW

NHL mathematicians know this question as "The Spezza Conundrum."
faceto27
Location: Burke: Best part of today is I
Joined: 01.21.2010

Mar 1 @ 3:16 PM ET
Question.......

IF RoR had gone into waivers, I'm assuming he would still be without a contract by the team that picked him up..... right?

And if that is the case, then the new team would need to try and sign him as a RFA
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: The centre of the hockey universe
Joined: 07.31.2006

Mar 1 @ 3:19 PM ET
Question.......

IF RoR had gone into waivers, I'm assuming he would still be without a contract by the team that picked him up..... right?

And if that is the case, then the new team would need to try and sign him as a RFA

- faceto27

wrong

existing contract
Feeling Glucky?
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Tanktown, ON
Joined: 10.08.2008

Mar 1 @ 3:19 PM ET
Question.......

IF RoR had gone into waivers, I'm assuming he would still be without a contract by the team that picked him up..... right?

And if that is the case, then the new team would need to try and sign him as a RFA

- faceto27

No, he'd have the contract Calgary offered him.
LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

Mar 1 @ 3:20 PM ET
NHL mathematicians know this question as "The Spezza Conundrum."
- Atomic Wedgie

He has competition for the most annoying laugh now.
faceto27
Location: Burke: Best part of today is I
Joined: 01.21.2010

Mar 1 @ 3:21 PM ET
No, he'd have the contract Calgary offered him.
- Feeling Glucky?



Then that leads to this........ which team from the bottom feeders would actually take on that contract.

6.5 mil for essentially 4 years, the way I understand it. Factoring in that the new team would have to qualify once this deal expired.
p_zub
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 02.20.2007

Mar 1 @ 3:22 PM ET
So...apparently there's rumour on the twitternets that Colorado has yet to even file their notice of matching the offer sheet? This could get really nasty for Calgary now, if that's the case....thought I suspect Colorado would still match despite the recent news coming out. They want ROR under their control, and to move him on their terms.
mykokes
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: RELEASE THE LATVIAN!, ON
Joined: 11.09.2009

Mar 1 @ 3:23 PM ET
Then that leads to this........ which team from the bottom feeders would actually take on that contract.

6.5 mil for essentially 4 years, the way I understand it. Factoring in that the new team would have to qualify once this deal expired.

- faceto27


I wonder....if Colorado technically was in 30th place.....could they reclaim him right after not matching? Now i'm just getting all ridiculous in this thread....
Eliminason
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Vancouver, BC
Joined: 01.03.2013

Mar 1 @ 3:25 PM ET
Then that leads to this........ which team from the bottom feeders would actually take on that contract.

6.5 mil for essentially 4 years, the way I understand it. Factoring in that the new team would have to qualify once this deal expired.

- faceto27



I would say Columbus would be interested. Would be a good piece along with their ***THREE*** first round picks this year to be in a good place 2-3 years from now.
LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

Mar 1 @ 3:26 PM ET
New blog up
faceto27
Location: Burke: Best part of today is I
Joined: 01.21.2010

Mar 1 @ 3:26 PM ET
New blog up
- LeafMan



What your point Lou?


LeafMan
Location: A proof is a proof. And when you have a good proof, it's because it's proven
Joined: 05.20.2007

Mar 1 @ 3:27 PM ET
What your point Lou?



- faceto27

don't know, too lazy to mod two blogs?
Woderwick
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: David Clarkson's Water Bottle, ON
Joined: 02.12.2013

Mar 1 @ 3:27 PM ET
So...apparently there's rumour on the twitternets that Colorado has yet to even file their notice of matching the offer sheet? This could get really nasty for Calgary now, if that's the case....thought I suspect Colorado would still match despite the recent news coming out. They want ROR under their control, and to move him on their terms.
- p_zub


For some reason your word "apparently" had me reading your entire post impersonating Yan from Yan Can Cook. Thank goodness it's Friday.
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties
Joined: 06.27.2012

Mar 1 @ 5:18 PM ET
Kessel's not your typical scorer. He can score from far out/weird angles because he's accurate, and has an insanely fast, sneaky shot. Even from far out, goalies won't see the puck until it's in the back of the net.

The problem is, usually he's mixing it up, he'll snipe one from a weird angle one play, and drive the net the next. Now he's being too consistent with trying to get it in from the outside, so the goalies are expecting it more.

The bigger problem is, last few game's he's just been lazy. Needs to dial up the intensity. Maybe Kadri should share his coke stash.

- Feeling Glucky?


This is an extremely convoluted way of saying he is shooting from stupid angles and long distances.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97