Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Mike Augello: What Price Would Be Right For Kessel?; Leafs vs Jets
Author Message
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties
Joined: 06.27.2012

Feb 8 @ 12:53 PM ET
Yeah, meh.

Sens were robbed of a goal against the Habs. It evens out at the end of the year, I guess.

- Pecafan Fan


The more troublesome thing for the Habs is that Ott was standing in the crease, with less than 10 seconds left in the game, surrounded by three Hab players and not a single one of them seemed to care to move him from his position.
Leeman4Gilmour
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: "Obviously, Reimer must be the, AB
Joined: 02.02.2010

Feb 8 @ 12:53 PM ET
You gotta watch the little things that he does though dude. Clearing the puck, making smart plays, blocking shots> Hes on the Pk, hes on the PP> He makes smart descisions. He very much has played like an allstar so far. He has been amazing, frankly. His game last night was nearly perfect.
- Aquaman_2400


When he's not knocking pucks into his own net, his game is nearly perfect. "Nearly" is obviously being used very loosely here.
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: The centre of the hockey universe
Joined: 07.31.2006

Feb 8 @ 12:54 PM ET
No, it's not even possible because neither team they play for is that stupid.

No, you can't get either one of them for a laughable package of Grabovski, Gunnarsson and a 1st.

- Two_For_Truth

It's hard for some Leafs fans to grasp this, but Gunnarson just isn't that good.
tmlfan17
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.22.2010

Feb 8 @ 12:54 PM ET
Has Kadri ever scored 90 points in an NHL season? And don't say it's who Giroux plays with. He led his team in points and is now the captain. He earned what he got.

You got the wrong draft year by the way. Giroux is three years older than Kadri. It's a laughable comparison.

- Two_For_Truth

Your the one that's laughable....Robbie Earl.
p_zub
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Toronto, ON
Joined: 02.20.2007

Feb 8 @ 12:55 PM ET
It's hard for some Leafs fans to grasp this, but Gunnarson just isn't that good.
- Atomic Wedgie


Solid, steady, but nothing spectacular. Better as a bottom pairing guy...
tmlfan17
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.22.2010

Feb 8 @ 12:56 PM ET
I'm trying to figure out how Philly drafted Giroux so late when it's been stated by you many times that you need to tank to get any talent.....Admit your wrong. Seeing as you orgasm all over him
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: The centre of the hockey universe
Joined: 07.31.2006

Feb 8 @ 12:56 PM ET
Solid, steady, but nothing spectacular. Better as a bottom pairing guy...
- p_zub

It goes back to what I was saying this morning: playing with Phaneuf made him look a lot better than he actually is.
A_Tree
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: I'm r00ting for you™ - KS, ON
Joined: 05.06.2011

Feb 8 @ 12:57 PM ET

- Cfser

Pecafan Fan
Montreal Canadiens
Location: Pacioretty, c'est mou comme d'la marde - Gilbert Delorme
Joined: 01.20.2009

Feb 8 @ 12:57 PM ET
The more troublesome thing for the Habs is that Ott was standing in the crease, with less than 10 seconds left in the game, surrounded by three Hab players and not a single one of them seemed to care to move him from his position.
- Two_For_Truth


I know. It was stupid.



Budaj still sucks.
Kinger34
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: We may have already seen Matthews at his potential - SMBDragon, ON
Joined: 07.04.2011

Feb 8 @ 12:58 PM ET
+1

Seriously, we're slightly overachieving on defense (I actually think having a competent goaltender helps immensely), but let's be serious here: there's a lot of holes and weaknesses on this D core.

Just look at how they struggle to get the puck out their own end. It's as much the fault of the forwards, but we were lucky to win last night and we completely come apart against upper echelon teams.

- gravyface



Exactly. Look how bad they stuggled the first 5 minutes of the game last night. I realize the home crowd adrenaline was in full flight for the Jets but the Leafs looked lost out there. After the 1st minute of play I expected it would be 2 or 3 nothing Jets before the end of the 1st period.
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties
Joined: 06.27.2012

Feb 8 @ 12:58 PM ET
It's hard for some Leafs fans to grasp this, but Gunnarson just isn't that good.
- Atomic Wedgie


Gunnarsson is good. Just not that good.
Leeman4Gilmour
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: "Obviously, Reimer must be the, AB
Joined: 02.02.2010

Feb 8 @ 12:58 PM ET
No, it's not even possible because neither team they play for is that stupid.

No, you can't get either one of them for a laughable package of Grabovski, Gunnarsson and a 1st.

- Two_For_Truth


It seems like you could make better arguments if you weren't so focused on replying to what wasn't said. Drop the strawmen. Just give it a try.

I couldn't really care less about what Aquaman originally said, but the very first thing you did was contort his post into something that it wasn't.
tmlfan17
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.22.2010

Feb 8 @ 12:58 PM ET
Gunnarsson is good. Just not that good.
- Two_For_Truth

Stralmanesque...right uggie
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties
Joined: 06.27.2012

Feb 8 @ 1:00 PM ET
I know. It was stupid.



Budaj still sucks.

- Pecafan Fan


You want Komisarek back? He might have just enough brain power now to clear the front of the net.
burn
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: Tavares is sledge hockey level - Islesrbettr, ON
Joined: 08.02.2006

Feb 8 @ 1:00 PM ET
Holzer on the top pair today.
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties
Joined: 06.27.2012

Feb 8 @ 1:01 PM ET
It goes back to what I was saying this morning: playing with Phaneuf made him look a lot better than he actually is.
- Atomic Wedgie


Gunnarsson does just fine with or without Phaneuf.

And don't bother recap your love for Phaneuf as the Leafs best defender. He's still not making his partners look like superstars. He just sucks a little less than the rest of them.
The Law
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 01.29.2008

Feb 8 @ 1:01 PM ET
23rd in the league in goals against.

There's definitely room for improvement.

- Atomic Wedgie


18th (per game) ....and if you remove that horrendous 30 mins in the Islanders game they're into the top half of the league. IMO, tighter defensive play is one of the few positives ...so far.
Leeman4Gilmour
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: "Obviously, Reimer must be the, AB
Joined: 02.02.2010

Feb 8 @ 1:01 PM ET
It's hard for some Leafs fans to grasp this, but Gunnarson just isn't that good.
- Atomic Wedgie


At least he looks a little more composed and cool than some of the other guys. He's not brilliant, but he doesn't handle the puck like a hand grenade.

Franson, on the other hand... You could take the puck away from him with a dirty look.
tmlfan17
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.22.2010

Feb 8 @ 1:02 PM ET
Gunnarsson does just fine with or without Phaneuf.

And don't bother recant your love for Phaneuf as the Leafs best defender. He's still not making his partners look like superstars. He just sucks a little less than the rest of them.

- Two_For_Truth

Phaneuf is the Leafs best defender by far. Not his fault he has to play 5-7 minutes more than he should against the othe rteams best players.
Kinger34
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: We may have already seen Matthews at his potential - SMBDragon, ON
Joined: 07.04.2011

Feb 8 @ 1:02 PM ET
Gunnarsson does just fine with or without Phaneuf.

And don't bother recant your love for Phaneuf as the Leafs best defender. He's still not making his partners look like superstars. He just sucks a little less than the rest of them.

- Two_For_Truth



You seem to have a lot of pent up aggression man. Lighten up, it's Friday!!!!
Leeman4Gilmour
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: "Obviously, Reimer must be the, AB
Joined: 02.02.2010

Feb 8 @ 1:03 PM ET
Gunnarsson does just fine with or without Phaneuf.

And don't bother recant your love for Phaneuf as the Leafs best defender. He's still not making his partners look like superstars. He just sucks a little less than the rest of them.

- Two_For_Truth


Phaneuf sucks.

He can't even make career AHLers look like superstars.
bixll
Location: New Glasgow, NS
Joined: 09.04.2008

Feb 8 @ 1:03 PM ET
18th (per game) ....and if you remove that horrendous 30 mins in the Islanders game they're into the top half of the league. IMO, tighter defensive play is one of the few positives ...so far.
- The Law



The site is still not working correctly, or is it just me??
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: The centre of the hockey universe
Joined: 07.31.2006

Feb 8 @ 1:03 PM ET
It seems like you could make better arguments if you weren't so focused on replying to what wasn't said. Drop the strawmen. Just give it a try.

I couldn't really care less about what Aquaman originally said, but the very first thing you did was contort his post into something that it wasn't.

- Leeman4Gilmour

In Aquaman's defence, it must really suck to be sitting around the Justice League HQ, and a call comes in that there is an evil genius doing something that needs to be stopped, and you get all excited to go fight crime, and then Batman and Superman and Wonderwoman and the Wonder Twins tell you to take a seat because the crime they are fighting is in a downtown core, so they aren't going to need to summon the help of blue whales or seals or sharks or anything.
tmlfan17
Toronto Maple Leafs
Joined: 10.22.2010

Feb 8 @ 1:04 PM ET
You seem to have a lot of pent up aggression man. Lighten up, it's Friday!!!!
- Kinger34

Not like he has any plans this weekend.....just saying
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties
Joined: 06.27.2012

Feb 8 @ 1:04 PM ET
It seems like you could make better arguments if you weren't so focused on replying to what wasn't said. Drop the strawmen. Just give it a try.
- Leeman4Gilmour


Says the undisputed champion of strawman arguments. Hilarious.

I couldn't really care less about what Aquaman originally said, but the very first thing you did was contort his post into something that it wasn't.


What he posted, is what is being discussed. Sorry that you didn't understand what he posted.
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83  Next