Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties Joined: 06.27.2012
|
|
|
Dude, why the hostility? Lighten up. I am pretty sure the Leafs winning or losing has no material effect on your life. At least I hope not.
As for S my own D. I would if I could, and I would never leave the house. I would also have a much more interesting career. - Aetherial
That's what he does best. If he disagrees with someone, he must attack them personally. |
|
prock
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: Bobby Ryan + 1st rounder for Clarkson, ON Joined: 08.30.2007
|
|
|
http://www.pensionplanpuppets.com/2013/2/4/3950036/phil-kessel-scoring-drought-shot-choice-and-shooting-percentage
Read it and weep. - Two_For_Truth
First of all, I asked "out of curiousity", so there is hardly anything to "read it and weep" about.
Second....
Quite the opposite. I have proven stats that show that over half of Kessel's shots are from 31+ feet out.
What do you have?
Nothing. - Two_For_Truth
The shot chart there shows your post to be wrong. Read THAT and weep. |
|
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties Joined: 06.27.2012
|
|
|
First of all, I asked "out of curiousity", so there is hardly anything to "read it and weep" about.
Second....
The shot chart there shows your post to be wrong. Read THAT and weep. - prock
Oh so the CBC statistician is wrong? Wow, great to know.
Oh wait a minute. He wasn't.
17 of his 36 shots came from 31+ feet.
9 of those shots have come from 40+ feet.
5 of those shots have come from 49+ feet.
Oddly enough, only 3 of those 36 shots have been within 10 feet of the net.
Looks like a great way to score goals. |
|
prock
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: Bobby Ryan + 1st rounder for Clarkson, ON Joined: 08.30.2007
|
|
|
Oh so the CBC statistician is wrong? Wow, great to know.
- Two_For_Truth
I have no idea. But I know that YOU are.
Quite the opposite. I have proven stats that show that over half of Kessel's shots are from 31+ feet out.
What do you have?
Nothing. - Two_For_Truth
Simple math.
17 of his 36 shots came from 31+ feet.
- Two_For_Truth
17 is less than half of 36. |
|
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties Joined: 06.27.2012
|
|
|
I have no idea. But I know that YOU are.
Simple math.
17 is less than half of 36. - prock
Oh so 47% is acceptable.
Yeah, you lost this one. |
|
prock
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: Bobby Ryan + 1st rounder for Clarkson, ON Joined: 08.30.2007
|
|
|
Oh so 47% is acceptable.
Yeah, you lost this one. - Two_For_Truth
Umm, nice try. The stats you've been spouting for the entire thread aren't even true.
Not surprised though. |
|
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties Joined: 06.27.2012
|
|
|
Umm, nice try. The stats you've been spouting for the entire thread aren't even true.
Not surprised though. - prock
50% of his shots are from 28+ feet.
Does that make it all feel better for you? |
|
prock
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: Bobby Ryan + 1st rounder for Clarkson, ON Joined: 08.30.2007
|
|
|
50% of his shots are from 28+ feet.
Does that make it all feel better for you? - Two_For_Truth
No, better for you, that you're no longer posting crap though.
Still nothing like Blake, which was the claim earlier, anyway. |
|
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties Joined: 06.27.2012
|
|
|
No, better for you, that you're no longer posting crap though.
Still nothing like Blake, which was the claim earlier, anyway. - prock
One shot short of 50%. Sorry but you're the one posting crap here. You have absolutely no counter argument whatsoever. All you are doing is splitting hairs and avoiding the point.
Yes, he is playing like Blake. Perimeter, low percentage shots. Just proved it to you and you still ignore it.
He has more shots from 50+ feet than he does from 10 feet.
How much more basic does it need to be? |
|
prock
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: Bobby Ryan + 1st rounder for Clarkson, ON Joined: 08.30.2007
|
|
|
One shot short of 50%. Sorry but you're the one posting crap here. You have absolutely no counter argument whatsoever. All you are doing is splitting hairs and avoiding the point.
Yes, he is playing like Blake. Perimeter, low percentage shots. Just proved it to you and you still ignore it.
He has more shots from 50+ feet than he does from 10 feet.
How much more basic does it need to be? - Two_For_Truth
You haven't shown that he's playing like Blake at all. |
|
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties Joined: 06.27.2012
|
|
|
You haven't shown that he's playing like Blake at all. - prock
47% of his shots are from 31+ feet and he has more shots from 50+ feet than from 10 feet.
Right. |
|
prock
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: Bobby Ryan + 1st rounder for Clarkson, ON Joined: 08.30.2007
|
|
|
47% of his shots are from 31+ feet and he has more shots from 50+ feet than from 10 feet.
Right. - Two_For_Truth
So, what were Blakes stats like? |
|
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties Joined: 06.27.2012
|
|
|
So, what were Blakes stats like? - prock
Same style. |
|
prock
Vegas Golden Knights |
|
Location: Bobby Ryan + 1st rounder for Clarkson, ON Joined: 08.30.2007
|
|
|
Same style. - Two_For_Truth
Hahaha. Prove it. I suspect it would be even higher, and probably more from even 50 feet out. |
|
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties Joined: 06.27.2012
|
|
|
Hahaha. Prove it. I suspect it would be even higher, and probably more from even 50 feet out. - prock
More shots from 50+ feet than 10 or less feet.
Proven.
22 out of 36 shots from 25+ feet when inside 25 feet is clearly the hot spot for shooting.
Proven.
|
|
Skalapy
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I'm sick of your "I play real , NC Joined: 07.11.2006
|
|
|
First!
Any Habs rumours?
'Nuff said. - Kinger34
Yes. |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106 |