And that is not what I was doing with Whitney you tool. Not my problem you're too (frank)ing stupid to understand. And I could care less what you say, Schultz is better offensively than Yandle. Keep trying to act like a "big boy" maybe read what I post in here and you'll have a different opinion on what my points are. You're a loser who gets all (frank)ing poopy pants if someone says something you don't agree with. I said nothing about his stats 6 years ago affecting his trade value now, so pull your head out of your ass and brush up on your comprehension skills before you fly off at the mouth like a jack ass. And Schultz will have more points than Yandle this year, and continue to do so IMO if you don't like it then go (frank) yourself
- SpoiledByOil

i think you're the tool here. go back and read your posts, i'm not even sure you understand your own points.

if you think schultz is better than yandle now, then fine, you're entitled to your opinion. it's a very stupid and bias opinion, but by all means stick to it. it's like me saying that turris is better offensively then eberle.

At the very least, Gagner, 2013 1st, both our 2013 2nds and a good prospect.

You don't get Yandle for cheap.
- Morris

Yandle is a great player. I just don't think Tamby will pull the trigger on that, he's too conservative as a GM.

Seriously try and calm down a little. You are not doing yourself any favors. Hockeybuzz is probably not the best place for you if you are going to get into a habit of overreacting like this.
- heh49314

Yea I'm the one that overreacted

i think you're the tool here. go back and read your posts, i'm not even sure you understand your own points.

if you think schultz is better than yandle now, then fine, you're entitled to your opinion. it's a very stupid and bias opinion, but by all means stick to it. it's like me saying that turris is better offensively then eberle.
- sensarmy_11

No it's not at all. Everyone thinks it's blasphemy to say a Rollie is better than a current NHLer, I don't, Schultz will finish with more points, keep trying to act intelligent

Yandle is a great player. I just don't think Tamby will pull the trigger on that, he's too conservative as a GM.
- deks1

You're probably right. Especially since I think we need a competent two-way guy, maybe even a Jason Smith-type, not another rover.

Seriously try and calm down a little. You are not doing yourself any favors. Hockeybuzz is probably not the best place for you if you are going to get into a habit of overreacting like this.
- heh49314

And I really don't care what ppl on HB think of me especially when it's filled with jack asses like this guy. I made a simple comment, he acted like a child in response so I stooped to his level. If you don't like it then you can go (frank) yourself too

No it's not at all. Everyone thinks it's blasphemy to say a Rollie is better than a current NHLer, I don't, Schultz will finish with more points, keep trying to act intelligent
- SpoiledByOil

i will

as long as you promise to keep succeeding at looking stupid

And I really don't care what ppl on HB think of me especially when it's filled with jack asses like this guy. I made a simple comment, he acted like a child in response so I stooped to his level. If you don't like it then you can go (frank) yourself too
- SpoiledByOil

i think you're the tool here. go back and read your posts, i'm not even sure you understand your own points.

if you think schultz is better than yandle now, then fine, you're entitled to your opinion. it's a very stupid and bias opinion, but by all means stick to it. it's like me saying that turris is better offensively then eberle.
- sensarmy_11

And I'm glad one season over 50 points is a perennial allstar to you thanks for the education "big boy"

You're probably right. Especially since I think we need a competent two-way guy, maybe even a Jason Smith-type, not another rover.
- Morris

Whitney+ for Mezaros.

And I'm glad one season over 50 points is a perennial allstar to you thanks for the education "big boy"
- SpoiledByOil

is there a point requirement to be in the allstar game?

he's been 2 years in a row, and had there been one this year, he likely would have been there again.

considering he's only been in the league 4 full seasons, i'd say that's pretty good.

and your welcome for the education, it's clear you have a lot to learn

Yea I'm the one that overreacted
- SpoiledByOil

Name calling does not win any arguments. That is all I seen from you for the last 6 or 7 posts.

Whitney+ for Mezaros.
- deks1

i will

as long as you promise to keep succeeding at looking stupid
- sensarmy_11

Not sure it is possible for him to do differently

is there a point requirement to be in the allstar game?

he's been 2 years in a row, and had there been one this year, he likely would have been there again.

considering he's only been in the league 4 full seasons, i'd say that's pretty good.

and your welcome for the education, it's clear you have a lot to learn
- sensarmy_11

Yea he's definitely a "perennial" allstar. You obvious have very little if any hockey knowledge whatsoever to be trying to give an education. Maybe you should look up the definition of perennial and give yourself a bit of an education before you try and educate others. That's how false information gets spread and jack asses like yourself come about. 2 years, perennial allstar

So I'm an bumhole, and?? Does it offend you? Because if you get offended so easily maybe the Internet isn't for you.... Jack ass
- SpoiledByOil

Lol, wow. No it does not offend me in the slightest actually. But anyone who says anything that does not comply to what you say, you fly off the handle. So I stand by my original statement. Different opinions are all part of this thing called life. Deal with it and move on. Thank you by the way for proving my point that you only know how to have a conversation through insults.

Yea he's definitely a "perennial" allstar. You obvious have very little if any hockey knowledge whatsoever to be trying to give an education. Maybe you should look up the definition of perennial and give yourself a bit of an education before you try and educate others. That's how false information gets spread and jack asses like yourself come about. 2 years, perennial allstar
- SpoiledByOil

Average career of an NHLer is 6 seasons. I'd say you'd be looking at about 4 straight seasons or so for a player to be called (in that moment) a perennial all-star.

If you hold a strict definition of perennial, no player in NHL history is a perennial all-star.

Lol, wow. No it does not offend me in the slightest actually. But anyone who says anything that does not comply to what you say, you fly off the handle. So I stand by my original statement. Different opinions are all part of this thing called life. Deal with it and move on. Thank you by the way for proving my point that you only know how to have a conversation through insults.
- heh49314

Maybe you should start at the beginning of this convo and see who had an issue with a differing opinion then get back to me

Yea he's definitely a "perennial" allstar. You obvious have very little if any hockey knowledge whatsoever to be trying to give an education. Maybe you should look up the definition of perennial and give yourself a bit of an education before you try and educate others. That's how false information gets spread and jack asses like yourself come about. 2 years, perennial allstar
- SpoiledByOil

Perennial means recurrent.......recurrent means happens more than once. Last time i checked, 2 times in a row is more than 1. Was there anything else mr. Webster

Average career of an NHLer is 6 seasons. I'd say you'd be looking at about 4 straight seasons or so for a player to be called (in that moment) a perennial all-star.

If you hold a strict definition of perennial, no player in NHL history is a perennial all-star.
- Morris

The average is 6 years mostly because of plugs, and the average of 6 years hardly can even be mentioned with the word perennial, since it's basically the opposite of the meaning...

Perennial means recurrent.......recurrent means happens more than once. Last time i checked, 2 times in a row is more than 1. Was there anything else mr. Webster


- sensarmy_11

Perennial means long lasting, happening over and over again, by no means does it mean twice genius

Perennial means recurrent.......recurrent means happens more than once. Last time i checked, 2 times in a row is more than 1. Was there anything else mr. Webster


- sensarmy_11

Keep trying to act smart though big boy

Tears a huge hole in our forwards though, especially if Horcoff is bought out as claimed.

However, if we go out free agent shopping (and I'm just spit-balling)

Hall-RNH-Eberle
Pajaarvi-Bozak/Weiss/Zubrus -Yakupov
Smyth-Halpern-Jones
Harti-Belanger-Eager

Yandle-Smid
J.Schultz-Scuderi
Petry-N.Schultz

... maybe too much spitballing
- Morris

Dude be lucky if Smyth finishes the season this year... nevermind next year...

Perennial means long lasting, happening over and over again, by no means does it mean twice genius
- SpoiledByOil

Are you less bum hurt if i say he's been an allstar the last 2 years, rather then perennial?

When you start to argue semantics, it just means that your original point was probably wrong, and in this case, dumb.

Keep trying to act smart though big boy
- SpoiledByOil

Why are you calling me big boy? Hope you aren't hitting on me