faceto27
|
|
|
Location: Burke: Best part of today is I Joined: 01.21.2010
|
|
|
I actually agree with you for once. - Arctic_AARDVARK
There's always a first
|
|
AngryWhiteMale
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Ottawa, ON Joined: 09.14.2010
|
|
|
To TOR
Malkin
To PIT
Grabovski
Kessel
D'Amigo
2014 1st - optimus-reim
No comment |
|
billyberg10
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: HEAVEN Joined: 09.27.2011
|
|
|
EE says you guys are playoff bound - AdamFrench
just what we need ... Edwin EncarnaciĆ³n shooting off his mouth again...........dude needs to stick to hitting baseballs.......jerk....... |
|
Leafland
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: MATTHEW 20:16 "So the last will be first, and the first will be last.", ON Joined: 10.25.2011
|
|
|
With Staal gone and Crosby with a mashed potato-brain, there's no way Pitts trades Malkin. - Pecafan Fan
Ok how about that for Crosby |
|
AngryWhiteMale
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Ottawa, ON Joined: 09.14.2010
|
|
|
id rather keep Mac and Grabo around.. - Arctic_AARDVARK
Mac probably won't be kept around.
JVR has fit in well on Grab's line |
|
|
|
To TOR
Malkin
To PIT
Grabovski
Kessel
D'Amigo
2014 1st - optimus-reim
|
|
Leafland
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: MATTHEW 20:16 "So the last will be first, and the first will be last.", ON Joined: 10.25.2011
|
|
|
Only got 11 bucks..... ...Need it for beer - Fruitcakenipple
Huff some gasoline and bet the money. |
|
Arctic_AARDVARK
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Retired, ON Joined: 07.24.2011
|
|
|
Mac probably won't be kept around.
JVR has fit in well on Grab's line - AngryWhiteMale
still a little early. MacArthur is someone who gets little praise from Leafs nation.. I like him though, especially when he's pissed off. |
|
|
|
Colborne, Ashton, Biggs, and McKegg aren't exactly something to drool over.. - Arctic_AARDVARK
It is if you like big hits, great fights and front of the net goals. |
|
wingz4life
Detroit Red Wings |
|
|
Location: Canada Sucks, MI Joined: 01.31.2006
|
|
|
No comment - AngryWhiteMale
y not? |
|
Adam French
Atlanta Thrashers |
|
|
Location: Isn't Cooley 5"11? You know who else is 5"11? Sydney Crosby. - Scabeh Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
Oh god not this argument again.
He had one season with 55 pts and another two where he didn't crack 30 in either case.
I'd be intrigued if the man coming back was Duschene, but I doubt he will be moved, even if they did give the C to Landeskog - AngryWhiteMale
Kessel didn't crack 40 points until his third either... |
|
Deeps27
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Canada, ON Joined: 07.08.2007
|
|
|
25. Whatever the Maple Leafs decide to do with Phil Kessel, the one reason I'd be wary of trading him is he is perfectly suited to playing in Toronto. He doesn't pay attention to anything: the newspapers, sports radio, etc. It's hard to insulate yourself from that intensity. It's why Toronto and Montreal were ready to throw millions at the Sedins, who are similarly unbothered. Those guys can be hard to find.
-Lebrun 30 thoughts - jbold
What a coincidence - that's the same thought #25 that Elliote Friedman wrote in his 30 Thoughts blog too. I think that means the Leafs should re-sign him. |
|
AngryWhiteMale
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Ottawa, ON Joined: 09.14.2010
|
|
|
Kessel didn't crack 40 points until his third either... - AdamFrench
SILENCE FOOL! |
|
Deeps27
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Canada, ON Joined: 07.08.2007
|
|
|
To TOR
Malkin
To PIT
Grabovski
Kessel
D'Amigo
2014 1st - optimus-reim
Take out D'Amigo and that's a fair deal - don't want to overpay. |
|
|
|
No comment - AngryWhiteMale
Is that so? |
|
AngryWhiteMale
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Ottawa, ON Joined: 09.14.2010
|
|
|
still a little early. MacArthur is someone who gets little praise from Leafs nation.. I like him though, especially when he's pissed off. - Arctic_AARDVARK
Not that I'm being hard on Mac. He has produced goals, his finish is there.
He just might not be a fit over the medium-long term |
|
|
|
Take out D'Amigo and that's a fair deal - don't want to overpay. - Deeps27
It's Malkin, you have to 'overpay' IMO. |
|
|
|
Not that I'm being hard on Mac. He has produced goals, his finish is there.
He just might not be a fit over the medium-long term - AngryWhiteMale
Trade him for a 2013 1st. |
|
AngryWhiteMale
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Ottawa, ON Joined: 09.14.2010
|
|
|
Trade him for a 2013 1st. - optimus-reim
lol
Something tells me BB wasn't able to get a 1st for Mac |
|
Arctic_AARDVARK
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Retired, ON Joined: 07.24.2011
|
|
|
It is if you like big hits, great fights and front of the net goals. - optimus-reim
I like NHL quality players. Truthfully i don't care how they score goals or if they can fight |
|
systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON Joined: 09.12.2007
|
|
|
Kessel didn't crack 40 points until his third either... - AdamFrench
Kessel played 4 minutes less a game than him in their second years.
Multiply that by 82 games and its going to scew the stats. |
|
Timeforsoup
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Please don't mock me merciless, ON Joined: 10.15.2011
|
|
|
SILENCE FOOL! - AngryWhiteMale
Yay for overvaluing kessel!
|
|
|
|
lol
Something tells me BB wasn't able to get a 1st for Mac - AngryWhiteMale
Once he gets on fire I'm sure we'll see him traded.
Maybe Mac + Frany for ????? |
|
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties Joined: 06.27.2012
|
|
|
I still think Coborne has promise. - triggermartin
Probably not.
Ashton? That trade was a disaster.
Leafs can't play defense. Solution? Trade all the defensive defenders for big body forwards who don't use their size. |
|
PatC80
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: I would never let my children play hockey. The risk of getting drafted by Edmonton is too high", ON Joined: 08.11.2011
|
|
|
Once he gets on fire I'm sure we'll see him traded.
Maybe Mac + Frany for ????? - optimus-reim
To the Sharks for a 2013 1st and Douglas Murray? |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106 Next |