Mattjd123
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 10.01.2009
|
|
|
People that were alive when the Canucks won their 1st stanley cup, please stand up as well. - Allstarzz
Well I'm pretty sure I just impregnated my girlfriend so...how do I go about making him/her do that |
|
Beatle_john
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Corner of Kirk Maclean's Toe and Robert Reichel's face. Joined: 01.09.2006
|
|
|
They are not better than Minnesota or Edmonton. And as of today, Colorado too. On paper doesnt count, the standings do. Whether early in the season or not. - systemtool
Sorry, I was speaking in larger terms. Too big for you. Baby steps... oh look.. something sparkled..... ooohhh nice. |
|
Feeling Glucky?
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Tanktown, ON Joined: 10.08.2008
|
|
|
Is that a Reimer joke? - Mattjd123
Schneider. |
|
Beatle_john
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Corner of Kirk Maclean's Toe and Robert Reichel's face. Joined: 01.09.2006
|
|
|
Thankyou. - Allstarzz
I think you need to understand that, while making no excuses, a 2 - 1 loss is a loss and a 7 - 1 loss is a loss. There is no extra pudding for those children who puts more rocks in their pockets. |
|
Mattjd123
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 10.01.2009
|
|
|
Thankyou. - Allstarzz
7 games. I'm sticking with it.
|
|
|
|
People that were alive in 67 please stand up. - Mattjd123
that's by far the dumbest logic of all.
guess those cups didn't happen.. and babe ruth.. and columbus discovering america.
|
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
When the Bruins won, they won huge.
When the Bruins lost, they barely lost.
So yes, they did. Outscored 23-8. That's a smoke job. - Two_For_Truth
That makes much more sense, because the goals scored obviously matter more than games won. 4-3, hardly smoked. |
|
systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON Joined: 09.12.2007
|
|
|
Sorry, I was speaking in larger terms. Too big for you. Baby steps... oh look.. something sparkled..... ooohhh nice. - Beatle_john
So that 13-0 cup totals hurt you that much huh? Go play with your sparkly toy...it might be a Cup! No, its really not. |
|
Allstarzz
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 03.28.2011
|
|
|
I think you need to understand that, while making no excuses, a 2 - 1 loss is a loss and a 7 - 1 loss is a loss. There is no extra pudding for those children who puts more rocks in their pockets. - Beatle_john
I am not talking just about the score. The Bruins physically dominated the Nucks as well. It was just a beatdown. Surprised I would see that in a SCF. |
|
Beatle_john
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Corner of Kirk Maclean's Toe and Robert Reichel's face. Joined: 01.09.2006
|
|
|
Improper use of the word irony. - Feeling Glucky?
It is Ironic that fans like Systemtool tout the validation of the excellence of the Leafs while the banners are so old they actually needed to be replaced.
It's like rain on your wedding day. |
|
PrinceLH
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Belleville, ON Joined: 07.06.2007
|
|
|
People that were alive in 67 please stand up. - Mattjd123
Present! |
|
Allstarzz
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 03.28.2011
|
|
|
But that series was entertaining to watch. |
|
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties Joined: 06.27.2012
|
|
|
Just name 10. Luongo mentioned the trade..... - golfingsince
Lundqvist, Miller, Rinne, Ward, Kiprusoff, Quick, Price, Fleury, Lehtonen and Thomas (when he's playing). Hell, even Howard, Halak and Backstrom are more desirable.
He's 34, his contract sucks, he sucks and he's only going to get worse from here. |
|
Beatle_john
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Corner of Kirk Maclean's Toe and Robert Reichel's face. Joined: 01.09.2006
|
|
|
So that 13-0 cup totals hurt you that much huh? Go play with your sparkly toy...it might be a Cup! No, its really not. - systemtool
I can;t see. the throphy case is too full in Vancouver. You see, it gets opened so much, there is no dust on their accomplishments. |
|
|
|
That makes much more sense, because the goals scored obviously matter more than games won. 4-3, hardly smoked. - golfingsince
nope. cup wins mean more than no cup wins.
13-0. tool tried to give you guys one.. but no one seemed interested.
wierd.. |
|
systemtool
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: Real men always have to poo, ON Joined: 09.12.2007
|
|
|
I think you need to understand that, while making no excuses, a 2 - 1 loss is a loss and a 7 - 1 loss is a loss. There is no extra pudding for those children who puts more rocks in their pockets. - Beatle_john
Oh.
And winning a cup is winning a cup.
Not winning a cup is not winning cup
Good point. |
|
Beatle_john
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Corner of Kirk Maclean's Toe and Robert Reichel's face. Joined: 01.09.2006
|
|
|
Lundqvist, Miller, Rinne, Ward, Kiprusoff, Quick, Price, Fleury, Lehtonen and Thomas (when he's playing). Hell, even Howard, Halak and Backstrom are more desirable.
He's 34, his contract sucks, he sucks and he's only going to get worse from here. - Two_For_Truth
Thats highly subjective. Ward? Kip? Really? Did yo just go down a list somewhere? |
|
wingz4life
Detroit Red Wings |
|
|
Location: Canada Sucks, MI Joined: 01.31.2006
|
|
|
I can;t see. the throphy case is too full in Vancouver. You see, it gets opened so much, there is no dust on their accomplishments. - Beatle_john
ill sum this up. leafs suck, nucks suck, canada sucks. |
|
Allstarzz
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 03.28.2011
|
|
|
Lundqvist, Miller, Rinne, Ward, Kiprusoff, Quick, Price, Fleury, Lehtonen and Thomas (when he's playing). Hell, even Howard, Halak and Backstrom are more desirable.
He's 34, his contract sucks, he sucks and he's only going to get worse from here. - Two_For_Truth
Dude better include Halak before guys like Kipper and Lehtonen and Price. Halak is better than Price. |
|
golfingsince
|
|
|
Location: This message is Marwood approved! Joined: 11.30.2011
|
|
|
I am not talking just about the score. The Bruins physically dominated the Nucks as well. It was just a beatdown. Surprised I would see that in a SCF. - Allstarzz
You are dead wrong on that one. The Canucks were more physical than the B's until Rome laid out Horton. That hit kind of woke up the B's, and the physicality of the series turned on it. |
|
Beatle_john
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Corner of Kirk Maclean's Toe and Robert Reichel's face. Joined: 01.09.2006
|
|
|
Oh.
And winning a cup is winning a cup.
Not winning a cup is not winning cup
Good point. - systemtool
Yes, classy people admit their limitations and see themeselves and others under equal circumstances. |
|
Allstarzz
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Toronto, ON Joined: 03.28.2011
|
|
|
ill sum this up. leafs suck, nucks suck, canada sucks. - wingz4life
Nucks suck. Leafs suck. CANADA IS GREAT. |
|
Two_For_Truth
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: If the NHL wanted to cut ties Joined: 06.27.2012
|
|
|
That makes much more sense, because the goals scored obviously matter more than games won. 4-3, hardly smoked. - golfingsince
Did the Bruins get murdered 8-1, 4-0 (twice) and 5-1?
Did the Canucks? |
|
Mattjd123
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Location: Vancouver, BC Joined: 10.01.2009
|
|
|
I am not talking just about the score. The Bruins physically dominated the Nucks as well. It was just a beatdown. Surprised I would see that in a SCF. - Allstarzz
I really don't want to open up the cup of worms with that series, but I would agree with that on the physical part, but that was part of the Canucks approach. PP was their strength...series was largely "let them play"...etc etc
It all started after that damn Rome hit.
|
|
jribout
Season Ticket Holder Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: ON Joined: 01.24.2011
|
|
|
So Toronto has 13 Cups, The Canucks have 0. - systemtool
even as a die hard leaf fan i am going to suggest if you keep making this argument perhaps you should drop the first half of your name..... and that your avatar is perfect minus the humor |
|
Page: Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 107, 108, 109, 110, 111, 112, 113, 114, 115, 116, 117, 118, 119, 120, 121, 122, 123, 124, 125, 126, 127, 128, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133, 134, 135, 136, 137, 138, 139 Next |