And you really had to ask who is pouting?

Go ahead, keep getting angry because you have no glory to mention.

Obviously a Canucks fan has to wonder who cares about Cup wins. Its cute.

High 5 buddy?
- systemtool

he does have a point though, the rest of the original six do have cup wins since expansion.

yea, we'd still need to rely on TO's defense, goaltending and lines 2-4
- Feeling Glucky?

yeah, they would help round out the bottom pairing.......maybe. We could probably insert about 4 forwards......that's all.

Tell that to Mr. hockey Gordie Howe..How many cups did Howe win in his career? 2? So you saying he won the special olympics twice? He'd kick your (frank)ing ass.
- mykokes

he won 4

So the Leafs never has a player dubbed "Mr. Hockey"???

Odd that.


Speaking of which, how can you possibly explain that --- EVEN IN A 6 TEAM LEAGUE --- never has a Leaf won the Art Ross???
- Beatle_john

Try this post again. Without the mouth foam and obvious anger this time.

Ill take Cups over Art Ross. Thats about all I understood.

on 7 shots..and it was soft as eff.

and scrivens was brutal
- hugefemale dog77

Dubnyk, San Jose.


Nuff said.

he won 4
- BingoLady

SHH....

And NO Montreal Fans here.... screws up Toronto's mojo to think that their grand total of 13 totally sucks against Canada's real hockey team.

he does have a point though, the rest of the original six do have cup wins since expansion.
- wingz4life

Thats great they do. We're not debating with their fans though, are we?

Im debating with a Canucks fan, and what is true is they have 0 and we have 13.

You, as a Wings fan have my respect and envy. Canucks and their fans? Havent earned it.

he does have a point though, the rest of the original six do have cup wins since expansion.
- wingz4life

Exactly.

yeah, they would help round out the bottom pairing.......maybe. We could probably insert about 4 forwards......that's all.
- golfingsince

Come on. If we had an ECHL team, their bottom pairing would still be an upgrade over anything you have.

Try this post again. Without the mouth foam and obvious anger this time.

Ill take Cups over Art Ross. Thats about all I understood.
- systemtool

Yup.

So the Leafs never has a player dubbed "Mr. Hockey"???

Odd that.


Speaking of which, how can you possibly explain that --- EVEN IN A 6 TEAM LEAGUE --- never has a Leaf won the Art Ross???
- Beatle_john

Neither has a NY Ranger, a leaf has lead the league in scoring though before, but that was before it was called the Art Ross.

SHH....

And NO Montreal Fans here.... screws up Toronto's mojo to think that their grand total of 13 totally sucks against Canada's real hockey team.
- Beatle_john

No, we concede Montreal is the most historical and successful franchise in the NHL. Please dont compare your team to theirs in an effort to up the Leafs.

Habs have earned respect. Canucks...still looking for that 1st one..

Thats great they do. We're not debating with their fans though, are we?

Im debating with a Canucks fan, and what is true is they have 0 and we have 13.

You, as a Wings fan have my respect and envy. Canucks and their fans? Havent earned it.
- systemtool

Do I need to explain the Ek vs Lance Armstrong again?

Do I need to explain the Ek vs Lance Armstrong again?
- Beatle_john

If it helps you guys win a Cup. Yes.

Come on. If we had an ECHL team, their bottom pairing would still be an upgrade over anything you have.
- Feeling Glucky?

So why was Schenn in your top 4??

No, we concede Montreal is the most historical and successful franchise in the NHL. Please dont compare your team to theirs in an effort to up the Leafs.

Habs have earned respect. Canucks...still looking for that 1st one..
- systemtool

Man do you ever live up to your name.

he won 4
- BingoLady

But he played for 25 years, why didn't he win more if it was so easy?

Oh no, the special needs kids don't respect us.
- golfingsince

Thanks. That personal jab was necessary in a hockey debate.

Just shows the pain buddy, just shows the pain.

Do I need to explain the Ek vs Lance Armstrong again?
- Beatle_john

go share with your buddies the desire to compare divisional wins as more relevant than stanley cup championships. i'm sure you'll find alot of half masted folks.

in here.. no one cares. not so much.

trolls man, trolls..

Thanks. That personal jab was necessary in a hockey debate.

Just shows the pain buddy, just shows the pain.
- systemtool

You do know it has been longer since the leafs won the cup then when van joined the league....

But he played for 25 years, why didn't he win more if it was so easy?
- mykokes

he did not play 25 years in a 6 team league!

You do know it has been longer since the leafs won the cup then when van joined the league....
- rune_74

And thats the Leafs and their fans problem and concern how? The NHL didnt become relevant just because the Canucks joined. Im sorry to break this to you.

Did you know the Leafs have 13 Cups and the Canucks have 0?

You do know it has been longer since the leafs won the cup then when van joined the league....
- rune_74

you do know vancouver hasn't won poop.. ever. right?

go share with your buddies the desire to compare divisional wins as more relevant than stanley cup championships. i'm sure you'll find alot of half masted folks.

in here.. no one cares. not so much.

trolls man, trolls..
- joel878

Never said that dude... you are delusional. Go back and listen to your Brian Burke Motivational Tapes.

But he played for 25 years, why didn't he win more if it was so easy?
- mykokes

4 in 25 is pretty much 6 isn't it?