Some of us aren't lazy.. some of us don't just copy and paste.. stutter boy..
- DoctorNHL

Seek help. Good night.

Finally found it on page 20 is where it started.. Lupul for a first rounder.. that the Tool did not want to admit to...
- DoctorNHL

Gonna have to read that far back in the morining on work time.... Have a good one guys.

Gonna have to read that far back in the morining on work time.... Have a good one guys.
- Jimmy_wiener

You too. You'll see where he fell apart

Gonna have to read that far back in the morining on work time.... Have a good one guys.
- Jimmy_wiener

Cheers Jimmy

You too. You'll see where he fell apart
- systemtool

Also see how the Tool has none of his own stats.. waiting for someone else to come on and research it for him.. to prove his point.. poor baby..

Never said they would. Tons of elite NHLers werent drafted 1st or 2nd overall. Do you really need examples?

The point is that they were drafted, and they were drafted using 1st round picks.
- systemtool

Another post for page 23.. yes we do need to see the players that are on the top lines.. that were drafted in the first round...

Another post for page 23.. yes we do need to see the players that are on the top lines.. that were drafted in the first round...
- DoctorNHL

Seek help. Seriously, seek help.

They should have only kept Lupul if the playoffs were possible this year. Dont sign him until you know that. If the playoffs are not likely, trade him for future pieces.

- systemtool

Also from page 23... this quote from the Tool.. trade top liner for potential prospects..

Seek help. Seriously, seek help.
- systemtool

You didn't own your quotes.. wouldn't admit to it.. so you forced my hand... please own what you say..

You didn't own your quotes.. wouldn't admit to it.. so you forced my hand... please own what you say..
- DoctorNHL

Would you like me to continue...? or would you just own the argument..

Would you like me to continue...? or would you just own the argument..
- DoctorNHL

Seek help.

Also from page 23... this quote from the Tool.. trade top liner for potential prospects..
- DoctorNHL

04 draft I count 5 current top line players thats 16.66%. 03 draft I count 9 taken in the first

04 draft I count 5 current top line players thats 16.66%. 03 draft I count 9 taken in the first
- Cheeseballin

Thanks Cheese I can respect your effort besides some years are loaded.... and I expect there to be a few.. but is it worth trading a top line guy for a first rounder....? That was the question.. what are your thoughts... initially I said keep your picks.. develop them.. but add to your top line guys.. build around and add the youth.. What's your take?

04 draft I count 5 current top line players thats 16.66%. 03 draft I count 9 taken in the first
- Cheeseballin

LIAR ITS 3%!!!!

Its common sense at this point. Hes already been proven wrong. Dont even bother, im not.

LIAR ITS 3%!!!!

Its common sense at this point. Hes already been proven wrong. Dont even bother, im not.
- systemtool

Your argument I will remind you.. was about trading a first liner for a first rounder or prospect or would you like me to quote it again..

Your argument I will remind you.. was about trading a first liner for a first rounder or prospect or would you like me to quote it again..
- DoctorNHL

Seek help. Good night.

LIAR ITS 3%!!!!

Its common sense at this point. Hes already been proven wrong. Dont even bother, im not.
- systemtool

Your sense and common are not the same I just read 23 pages of your insight that most disagreed with.. would you like me to quote more...?

Seek help. Good night.
- systemtool

Still waiting for you to leave... you keep saying goodbye.. but the lips move.. and am still waiting..

Still waiting for you to leave... you keep saying goodbye.. but the lips move.. and am still waiting..
- DoctorNHL

Seek help. Good night.

I don't mind it. What was he at prior? 4.5ish? It's a risk. But it could have been a lot worse.
- weirdoh

First person to disagree with you Tool

Hopefully, I don't see any problems he has caused and from what the other players have said about him, he is well respected in that dressing room, you need these character guys around. Yes the term at five years is probably one year too long but I don't see it as an issue.
- LeafMan

Second to disagree with you.. in all fairness most ignored you for the first few pages..

Of course but any player can get injured, number 87 (not comparing) is a huge risk but that is the chance you take if you feel that player is important to your franchise.
- LeafMan

Again disagreed..

Second to disagree with you.. in all fairness most ignored you for the first few pages..
- DoctorNHL

Seek help

Again disagreed..
- DoctorNHL

I haven't even finished the 6th page.. will not bore anyone with the rest... so common sense.. by the history of those posters disagreeing with you and their excellent history.. I would say not...

Seek help
- systemtool

Is that all you got... run out of lame insults.. you must be a weak man.. see stats are facts.. as well as quotes to back my argument..