noffsin6
Detroit Red Wings |
|
|
Location: MI Joined: 08.01.2006
|
|
|
Unless they can convince Lindstrom to un-retire I expect to see Detroit more in the 6-10 range.
I think there are going to be a lot of kinks to work out on the defense early in the season. Datsyuk and Zetterberg should be ready to go early at least. |
|
fudd1689
Boston Bruins |
|
Location: Boston, MA Joined: 09.27.2010
|
|
|
I think you mixed up your NE division champs. It's Boston not Buffalo. I'm curious to why you chose Buffalo over Boston? Boston's skilled guys are better than Buffalo's, we have more depth on the bottom 6 and our overall defensive corps is stronger. As of now Miller is better than Tuukka but not for much longer. |
|
Enzomatic
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: Pegula for President, ON Joined: 09.08.2012
|
|
|
This must have been EA Sports simulated. |
|
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: The centre of the hockey universe Joined: 07.31.2006
|
|
|
Ian Esplen: The Prediction- this is Vancouver's year
The Prediction- this is Vancouver's year - IanEsplen
I'm confused: is Toronto in 15th with or without Lu?
Because I've been guaranteed a playoff spot by a few Canucks fans. Well worth Gardiner, Reilly and a 1st.
I'll agree with you about the Rangers, though. I think they are the team to beat in the east. |
|
IanEsplen
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Calgary, AB Joined: 11.22.2011
|
|
|
I'm confused: is Toronto in 15th with or without Lu?
Because I've been guaranteed a playoff spot by a few Canucks fans. Well worth Gardiner, Reilly and a 1st.
I'll agree with you about the Rangers, though. I think they are the team to beat in the east. - Atomic Wedgie
Without the boss |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
I'm confused: is Toronto in 15th with or without Lu?
Because I've been guaranteed a playoff spot by a few Canucks fans. Well worth Gardiner, Reilly and a 1st.
I'll agree with you about the Rangers, though. I think they are the team to beat in the east. - Atomic Wedgie
You think they're better/deeper than Pittsburgh? |
|
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: The centre of the hockey universe Joined: 07.31.2006
|
|
|
You think they're better/deeper than Pittsburgh? - LeftCoaster
They were last year, and they've just added Nash.
And I know I will get howls of protest on this, but I've never been a huge fan of Fleury. I think Pittsburgh will always be vulnerable in the playoffs to a high scoring team.
I've got to pick one of the fifteen teams, right? I'm going with the Blueshirts.
Yeah, not the ones with the maple leaf on the front. |
|
noffsin6
Detroit Red Wings |
|
|
Location: MI Joined: 08.01.2006
|
|
|
You think they're better/deeper than Pittsburgh? - LeftCoaster
Pittsburgh has a huge question mark in goal. If one of them steps up and plays solid they could win everything. If Fleury has one of his bad streaks and Vokoun doesn't bail them out they might not make the playoffs. |
|
AceRatbang
|
|
|
Location: Chicago, IL Joined: 07.20.2012
|
|
|
Holy cow, Detroit with the 1 seed?
With that defense? |
|
CanUSA17
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Schaumburg, IL Joined: 10.11.2010
|
|
|
Not playing- they have played together for what, 5-6 years now. They will be fine without warm ups.
Issue in net?- if by issue you mean two of the best in the league, then yes.
No. 2 C- He'll be there pretty quick. trust me on that - IanEsplen
How do you know that? And why should we trust you? Ek told you? |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Eastern
1 NY Rangers
2 Boston
3 Pittsburgh
4 Philadelphia
5 Washington
6 Buffalo
7 Carolina
8 Winnipeg
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Ottawa
10 Florida
11 Tampa
12 Montreal
13 Toronto
14 New Jersey
15 NY Islanders
Western
1 St. Louis
2 Los Angeles
3 Vancouver
4 Chicago
5 Minny
6 San Jose
7 Detroit
8 Nashville
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9 Colorado
10 Dallas
11 Edmonton
12 Columbus
13 Calgary
14 Anaheim
15 Phoenix
|
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
They were last year, and they've just added Nash.
And I know I will get howls of protest on this, but I've never been a huge fan of Fleury. I think Pittsburgh will always be vulnerable in the playoffs to a high scoring team.
I've got to pick one of the fifteen teams, right? I'm going with the Blueshirts.
Yeah, not the ones with the maple leaf on the front. - Atomic Wedgie
Probably the right choice, just curious is all. That said, if Fleury gets hot, he can be one of the best! I just can't count out a team with Crosby and Malkin on it is all. |
|
Boinker
Vancouver Canucks |
|
Joined: 10.24.2010
|
|
|
Detroit number one and going to the Western Conference Finals? I'll have what you're having. - YouAreTheGovt
Agreed that's insane. |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Pittsburgh has a huge question mark in goal. If one of them steps up and plays solid they could win everything. If Fleury has one of his bad streaks and Vokoun doesn't bail them out they might not make the playoffs. - noffsin6
Big if, he's been both good and bad...but they've got Malkin and Crosby. Two best forwards in the league. |
|
noffsin6
Detroit Red Wings |
|
|
Location: MI Joined: 08.01.2006
|
|
|
Holy cow, Detroit with the 1 seed?
With that defense? - AceRatbang
Yeah I don't see it either.
Having said that I don't think the defense will be as bad as you think. Smith in particular is going to surprise people and Quincey should be better this year. If everyone else steps up a little they should be pretty decent. Nobody is/was going to replace Lindstrom but they should be okay. |
|
|
|
Unless they can convince Lindstrom to un-retire I expect to see Detroit more in the 6-10 range.
I think there are going to be a lot of kinks to work out on the defense early in the season. Datsyuk and Zetterberg should be ready to go early at least. - noffsin6
And no Holmstrom either? My guess is the PP takes a serious hit this year. |
|
|
|
Oilers out??
I don't think so. In fact, I predict they actually end up over the Wings. I fear this team (most have been playing thru the lockout) more than the Canucks and Wings.
Mark this down. |
|
Atomic Wedgie
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
|
Location: The centre of the hockey universe Joined: 07.31.2006
|
|
|
Yeah I don't see it either.
Having said that I don't think the defense will be as bad as you think. Smith in particular is going to surprise people and Quincey should be better this year. If everyone else steps up a little they should be pretty decent. Nobody is/was going to replace Lindstrom but they should be okay. - noffsin6
Have you factored in an additional 5 losses from Monster in net as your backup for 5 games?
I must confess: I'm more curious about what is going to happen this summer than what happens this year with most teams.
It's going to be a wild, wacky summer. |
|
imsorry66
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Bruins all huddled around the Eastern Conference Trophy. What a bunch of losers. Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Did you get help from dshiddy on this prediction? - imsorry66
Well look who crawled outta his hole...welcome back! |
|
noffsin6
Detroit Red Wings |
|
|
Location: MI Joined: 08.01.2006
|
|
|
And no Holmstrom either? My guess is the PP takes a serious hit this year. - cryptical77
The powerplay will take a hit without both Holmstrom and Lindstrom but Holmstrom was too much of a liability 5 on 5 last year. Hard to keep him on the roster just to play on the powerplay. |
|
imsorry66
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Bruins all huddled around the Eastern Conference Trophy. What a bunch of losers. Joined: 02.16.2007
|
|
|
Well look who crawled outta his hole...welcome back! - LeftCoaster
Refused to enter this site or any other hockey site until lockout was over. |
|
LeftCoaster
San Jose Sharks |
|
|
Location: Shark City, CA Joined: 07.03.2009
|
|
|
Refused to enter this site or any other hockey site until lockout was over. - imsorry66
Nice rack...as always.
PS: I'm only being nice for a couple of posts, then I'm all over you like white on rice! |
|
noffsin6
Detroit Red Wings |
|
|
Location: MI Joined: 08.01.2006
|
|
|
Have you factored in an additional 5 losses from Monster in net as your backup for 5 games?
I must confess: I'm more curious about what is going to happen this summer than what happens this year with most teams.
It's going to be a wild, wacky summer. - Atomic Wedgie
Well almost everybody gets a little better when they leave Toronto. And the Wings do fine with semi decent goalies who let in an occasional really bad goal (see Osgood, Chris). I'd knock it down to 1-3 additional losses. |
|
Nerko77
Chicago Blackhawks |
|
Location: Chicago, IL Joined: 01.15.2010
|
|
|
Same blog, just different season... cut and paste
No prediction until rosters are finalized... would take #8 for Chicago at this point... |
|