bradjc
|
|
Location: AB Joined: 01.17.2011
|
|
|
@TSNBobMcKenzie: I can tell you there's a hugely negative vibe emanating from both sides right now. Keeping this process on rails today will be challenging.
|
|
sippyd
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: Some unreal areas in the suburbs of Detroit. Buffalo, being smaller, simply doesn't have that.-Prock, NY Joined: 09.30.2007
|
|
|
Did he get in another bar brawl ? - Maximum Signal
Inconsistant play. That coach will have no part of it. What Kassian needs IMO.
|
|
Giroux_Is_God
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: CLASS DISMISSED Joined: 12.15.2011
|
|
|
According to Bob McKenzie on Twitter, "@TSNBobMcKenzie: PA doesn't like 5 yr term limits on contracts or 10 yr term of CBA or fact that Make Whole bump to $300M is tied to accepting 10 yr CBA."
I don't get it. Why would players not want a long term CBA deal? If there's another CBA in 5 years, it's not the players who are going on Strike, it will be another lock out. So players will lose again.
I think it's Fehr wanting something to do in 5 years as he knows in 10 years he will be retired. - l3ig_l2ecl
So basically what you're telling me is that on the 3 core issues of this new CBA, the players are unhappy with any of them?
What a joke. |
|
Giroux_Is_God
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: CLASS DISMISSED Joined: 12.15.2011
|
|
|
@TSNBobMcKenzie: I can tell you there's a hugely negative vibe emanating from both sides right now. Keeping this process on rails today will be challenging. - bradjc
|
|
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Candyland, PA Joined: 09.20.2007
|
|
|
According to Bob McKenzie on Twitter, "@TSNBobMcKenzie: PA doesn't like 5 yr term limits on contracts or 10 yr term of CBA or fact that Make Whole bump to $300M is tied to accepting 10 yr CBA."
I don't get it. Why would players not want a long term CBA deal? If there's another CBA in 5 years, it's not the players who are going on Strike, it will be another lock out. So players will lose again.
I think it's Fehr wanting something to do in 5 years as he knows in 10 years he will be retired. - l3ig_l2ecl
It's my understanding, and could be wrong about this. But Fehr is signed on a Executive Director of the PA just for this CBA negotiation. And is going to leave the position when it's done. Again, I could be wrong, but I remember reading that somewhere. |
|
Maximum Signal
Season Ticket Holder Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: Buffalo, NY Joined: 07.11.2008
|
|
|
THEN WHY NOT JUST LEAVING??? GOOD RIDDANCE!!!! - Le_Moderateur
As so well put by you many times STFU ! |
|
Flyers_1488
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Philly , PA Joined: 05.15.2012
|
|
|
Hmmm. you should steer clear of this. - Fountain-San
Yeah I suppose you are right
|
|
The-O-G
Calgary Flames |
|
|
Joined: 11.29.2011
|
|
|
|
|
According to Bob McKenzie on Twitter, "@TSNBobMcKenzie: PA doesn't like 5 yr term limits on contracts or 10 yr term of CBA or fact that Make Whole bump to $300M is tied to accepting 10 yr CBA."
I don't get it. Why would players not want a long term CBA deal? If there's another CBA in 5 years, it's not the players who are going on Strike, it will be another lock out. So players will lose again.
I think it's Fehr wanting something to do in 5 years as he knows in 10 years he will be retired. - l3ig_l2ecl
Because the players are f-in retarded.
Biggest peice of evidence that the players are overpaid? They actually beleive the deserve the money. Like a spoiled rich kid hoping for his parents to die. |
|
|
|
As so well put by you many times STFU ! - Maximum Signal
HAHAHAHAHA NEVER!! |
|
Flyers_1488
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Philly , PA Joined: 05.15.2012
|
|
|
@TSNBobMcKenzie: I can tell you there's a hugely negative vibe emanating from both sides right now. Keeping this process on rails today will be challenging. - bradjc
Nothing New!! NEXT |
|
Fountain-San
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: Marchand is a rat fink dweeb.., ME Joined: 02.21.2007
|
|
|
well it confirmed the season is cancelled Bettman and Fehr are back at the table........ face to face - Alexzanki
hey man enough. take it somewhere else!! |
|
l3ig_l2ecl
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Unfortunately, QC Joined: 07.01.2009
|
|
|
Cmon dude. Really? Bettman aint going anywhere. He did exactly what he had to do. It was pretty obvious the day the NHLPA hired Fehr well over a year ago that this was going to be a brawl & the players wanted blood because for some reason their perception was they got bent over pretty bad in 2004. In reality they didnt, but one thing I have learned in business over the years, perception is reality. This negotiation was a game & it took two to play. - Kevin R
I Agree. In early summer, Bettman/Owners offered a proposal that was outrageous to some, but in reality, it simply showed where he wanted to be. He offered 43% of revenues, because he knew it would be 50/50 in the end. The problem was Fehr who wasted time. If he had worked towards the 50% mark, we wouldn't be in December without hockey.
Example is Owners wanting $211mil of makewhole and players ironically want $389mil. 50% of that is $300mil. Owners countered to that in order not to waste time. If players are smart they will accept it. Unfortunately, it seems the owners might have given in too soon, so likely Ferh will ask for more and screw things up.
Bettman as much as we hate him, has tried to set the whole grounds work for this. The 50/50 mark was there from the start. Damages from the Lockout is on the PA. I'm OK with the makewhole, NHL should pay some. |
|
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Candyland, PA Joined: 09.20.2007
|
|
|
Because the players are f-in retarded.
Biggest peice of evidence that the players are overpaid? They actually beleive the deserve the money. Like a spoiled rich kid hoping for his parents to die. - Buffalo--Sabres
Why don't they deserve the money? |
|
l3ig_l2ecl
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Unfortunately, QC Joined: 07.01.2009
|
|
|
So basically what you're telling me is that on the 3 core issues of this new CBA, the players are unhappy with any of them?
What a joke. - Giroux_Is_God
That's what Bobby said...
I'm OK with them not being happy with the 5year contracts. I just don't get why unhappy with the 10year CBA. They should be happy with it long as according to Fehr, they will keep getting a 7% raise each year. |
|
Oilhab
Montreal Canadiens |
|
Location: Kessel = Selanne - Adam French Joined: 07.01.2006
|
|
|
Get HockeyyInsiderr in there and make it a group hug - BulliesPhan87
It would be funnier if it was a circle jerk |
|
eayost
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Into the Void, PA Joined: 04.14.2010
|
|
|
Bet the players wished they'd signed a 15 year CBA last time around.
5+ year deals effect so few players compared to the entire PA it'd be ridiculous for that to be some kind of final immovable roadblock. The 5% variance is a similar thing IMO. |
|
bradjc
|
|
Location: AB Joined: 01.17.2011
|
|
|
That's what Bobby said...
I'm OK with them not being happy with the 5year contracts. I just don't get why unhappy with the 10year CBA. They should be happy with it long as according to Fehr, they will keep getting a 7% raise each year. - l3ig_l2ecl
I wish we all got 7% raises every year!!! |
|
Homer
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: Parts Unknown Joined: 10.05.2006
|
|
|
Realistically I think there's a 50-50 shot this gets done in time to salvage a season. - The-O-G
way to go out on a limb |
|
MJL
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Candyland, PA Joined: 09.20.2007
|
|
|
I Agree. In early summer, Bettman/Owners offered a proposal that was outrageous to some, but in reality, it simply showed where he wanted to be. He offered 43% of revenues, because he knew it would be 50/50 in the end. The problem was Fehr who wasted time. If he had worked towards the 50% mark, we wouldn't be in December without hockey.
Example is Owners wanting $211mil of makewhole and players ironically want $389mil. 50% of that is $300mil. Owners countered to that in order not to waste time. If players are smart they will accept it. Unfortunately, it seems the owners might have given in too soon, so likely Ferh will ask for more and screw things up.
Bettman as much as we hate him, has tried to set the whole grounds work for this. The 50/50 mark was there from the start. Damages from the Lockout is on the PA. I'm OK with the makewhole, NHL should pay some. - l3ig_l2ecl
The ground work that Bettman and the NHL set going way back to the Summer, was to set an environment that saw the League wanting to crush the Union, and take from them in every area. It's only been since the NHL relented from their "our way or the highway" stance that any progress has been made. The NHL failed from the get go to recognize that a negotiation that creates labor harmony is how everyone makes out in the long run. |
|
Homer
Buffalo Sabres |
|
|
Location: Parts Unknown Joined: 10.05.2006
|
|
|
Why don't they deserve the money? - MJL
because nobody watches their sport (in comparison to the Big 3) |
|
Giroux_Is_God
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: CLASS DISMISSED Joined: 12.15.2011
|
|
|
Why don't they deserve the money? - MJL
Oh you have GOT to be kidding me MJL.
It is no secret ALL athletes in ANY sport are vastly overpaid (ok maybe except for the scrubs makin 625k).
You can't possibly think anyone deserves to be handed a $125 million to merely play a game, right?
RIGHT?? |
|
eayost
Philadelphia Flyers |
|
|
Location: Into the Void, PA Joined: 04.14.2010
|
|
|
The ground work that Bettman and the NHL set going way back to the Summer, was to set an environment that saw the League wanting to crush the Union, and take from them in every area. It's only been since the NHL relented from their "our way or the highway" stance that any progress has been made. The NHL failed from the get go to recognize that a negotiation that creates labor harmony is how everyone makes out in the long run. - MJL
Do you think if Bettman offered 50% on the league's first offer that the PA would have ever gone to 50%? |
|
canadianpenfan
Pittsburgh Penguins |
|
|
Location: Calgary Joined: 05.13.2010
|
|
|
Why are there so many people walking on that "rollercoaster"? |
|
l3ig_l2ecl
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Unfortunately, QC Joined: 07.01.2009
|
|
|
The ground work that Bettman and the NHL set going way back to the Summer, was to set an environment that saw the League wanting to crush the Union, and take from them in every area. It's only been since the NHL relented from their "our way or the highway" stance that any progress has been made. The NHL failed from the get go to recognize that a negotiation that creates labor harmony is how everyone makes out in the long run. - MJL
Are you (frank)ing kidding me?
How can a any human with a functioning brain think the way you do?
Dude, have you ever negotiated anything in your life?
Buy a car. It's 20k msrp. You need it to drop by 2k. Do you go to the sales guy and ask "I need 2 k off? NO, because he will say, I can only do 500. You might then be able to push $250 more.
Instead, you go, I need 4K off to make a deal. He looks and laughs. He can't. You then ask what can he do. So he gives you $1000. You tell him that wont do. You say you might be able with 3000 off. He goes talk to his boss, comes back and gives you the 2K you really wanted from the start. Worst case scenario is, he offeres 1K off, but gives you winter tires, fills up the gas, a first oil change on him, winter mats, etc... |
|