Funny thread of gayness.

Personally, instead of boycotting it, I think it would be hilarious if all gay people made Chick-Fil-A their hang out.

Could you imagine all chick-fil-a's nation wide all of a sudden being populated by homosexuals? Of course, straight people would stop going (people segregate themselves, this isn't prejudicial).. and CFA would become known as the "gay spot".

What would the company do? Shut down based on beliefs? Or would he take all that 'gay money'?
- LOLKessel

I like it

I like it
- mfreedman

It would be pretty funny. Go in, buy a coffee, and sit for an hour to drink it.

It would be pretty funny. Go in, buy a coffee, and sit for an hour to drink it.
- prock

Hey, it's non confrontational, and may win people over to their cause.

Funny thread of gayness.

Personally, instead of boycotting it, I think it would be hilarious if all gay people made Chick-Fil-A their hang out.

Could you imagine all chick-fil-a's nation wide all of a sudden being populated by homosexuals? Of course, straight people would stop going (people segregate themselves, this isn't prejudicial).. and CFA would become known as the "gay spot".

What would the company do? Shut down based on beliefs? Or would he take all that 'gay money'?
- LOLKessel

Nice try but you failed starting with "Funny thread of gayness." You have missed the point. This thread isn't about 'gayness', whatever that is..., but about acceptance.

Second, stating "of course, straight people would stop going" is a ridiculous generalization. CFA would be known as the 'gay spot' by people in your world. In mine it would be known as a 'restaurant.' And by the way, certain people may distance themselves but people don't segregate themselves.

Nice try at being funny but I think you were more successful at exposing a degree of intolerance. The words we use are indicative of how we think.

Nice try but you failed starting with "Funny thread of gayness." You have missed the point. This thread isn't about 'gayness', whatever that is..., but about acceptance.

Second, stating "of course, straight people would stop going" is a ridiculous generalization. CFA would be known as the 'gay spot' by people in your world. In mine it would be known as a 'restaurant.' And by the way, certain people may distance themselves but people don't segregate themselves.

Nice try at being funny but I think you were more successful at exposing a degree of intolerance. The words we use are indicative of how we think.
- dawgzhouse

GAAAAAYYYYYY

It would be pretty funny. Go in, buy a coffee, wait for it to cool a little... Pour it over your boyfriend's body and spend 3 hours licking it off.
- prock

Fixed.

Fap fap fap...



FAP FAP FAP FAP FAP

Nice try but you failed starting with "Funny thread of gayness." You have missed the point. This thread isn't about 'gayness', whatever that is..., but about acceptance.

Second, stating "of course, straight people would stop going" is a ridiculous generalization. CFA would be known as the 'gay spot' by people in your world. In mine it would be known as a 'restaurant.' And by the way, certain people may distance themselves but people don't segregate themselves.

Nice try at being funny but I think you were more successful at exposing a degree of intolerance. The words we use are indicative of how we think.
- dawgzhouse

I'm sure you go to ̶ "bars" all the time

Top ten grammar mistakes that make you look stupid

#1: Loose for lose

No: I always loose the product key.

Yes: I always lose the product key.

#2: It's for its (or god forbid, its')

No: Download the HTA, along with it's readme file.

Yes: Download the HTA, along with its readme file.

No: The laptop is overheating and its making that funny noise again.

Yes: The laptop is overheating and it's making that funny noise again.

#3: They're for their for there

No: The managers are in they're weekly planning meeting.

Yes: The managers are in their weekly planning meeting.

No: The techs have to check there cell phones at the door, and their not happy about it.

Yes: The techs have to check their cell phones at the door, and they're not happy about it.

#4: i.e. for e.g.

No: Use an anti-spyware program (i.e., Ad-Aware).

Yes: Use an anti-spyware program (e.g., Ad-Aware).

Note: The term i.e. means "that is"; e.g. means "for example." And a comma follows both of them.

#5: Effect for affect

No: The outage shouldn't effect any users during work hours.

Yes: The outage shouldn't affect any users during work hours.

Yes: The outage shouldn't have any effect on users.

Yes: We will effect several changes during the downtime.

Note: Impact is not a verb. Purists, at least, beg you to use affect instead:

No: The outage shouldn't impact any users during work hours.

Yes: The outage shouldn't affect any users during work hours.

Yes: The outage should have no impact on users during work hours.

#6: You're for your

No: Remember to defrag you're machine on a regular basis.

Yes: Remember to defrag your machine on a regular basis.

No: Your right about the changes.

Yes: You're right about the changes.

#7: Different than for different from

No: This setup is different than the one at the main office.

Yes: This setup is different from the one at the main office.

Yes: This setup is better than the one at the main office.

#8 Lay for lie

No: I got dizzy and had to lay down.

Yes: I got dizzy and had to lie down.

Yes: Just lay those books over there.

#9: Then for than

No: The accounting department had more problems then we did.

Yes: The accounting department had more problems than we did.

Note: Here's a sub-peeve. When a sentence construction begins with If, you don't need a then. Then is implicit, so it's superfluous and wordy:

No: If you can't get Windows to boot, then you'll need to call Ted.

Yes: If you can't get Windows to boot, you'll need to call Ted.

#10: Could of, would of for could have, would have

No: I could of installed that app by mistake.

Yes: I could have installed that app by mistake.

No: I would of sent you a meeting notice, but you were out of town.

Yes: I would have sent you a meeting notice, but you were out of town.

Affect/effect gives me trouble.

Affect/effect gives me trouble.
- laughs2907

Along with a lot of other crap.

Top ten grammar mistakes that make you look stupid

#1: Loose for lose

No: I always loose the product key.

Yes: I always lose the product key.

#2: It's for its (or god forbid, its')

No: Download the HTA, along with it's readme file.

Yes: Download the HTA, along with its readme file.

No: The laptop is overheating and its making that funny noise again.

Yes: The laptop is overheating and it's making that funny noise again.

#3: They're for their for there

No: The managers are in they're weekly planning meeting.

Yes: The managers are in their weekly planning meeting.

No: The techs have to check there cell phones at the door, and their not happy about it.

Yes: The techs have to check their cell phones at the door, and they're not happy about it.

#4: i.e. for e.g.

No: Use an anti-spyware program (i.e., Ad-Aware).

Yes: Use an anti-spyware program (e.g., Ad-Aware).

Note: The term i.e. means "that is"; e.g. means "for example." And a comma follows both of them.

#5: Effect for affect

No: The outage shouldn't effect any users during work hours.

Yes: The outage shouldn't affect any users during work hours.

Yes: The outage shouldn't have any effect on users.

Yes: We will effect several changes during the downtime.

Note: Impact is not a verb. Purists, at least, beg you to use affect instead:

No: The outage shouldn't impact any users during work hours.

Yes: The outage shouldn't affect any users during work hours.

Yes: The outage should have no impact on users during work hours.

#6: You're for your

No: Remember to defrag you're machine on a regular basis.

Yes: Remember to defrag your machine on a regular basis.

No: Your right about the changes.

Yes: You're right about the changes.

#7: Different than for different from

No: This setup is different than the one at the main office.

Yes: This setup is different from the one at the main office.

Yes: This setup is better than the one at the main office.

#8 Lay for lie

No: I got dizzy and had to lay down.

Yes: I got dizzy and had to lie down.

Yes: Just lay those books over there.

#9: Then for than

No: The accounting department had more problems then we did.

Yes: The accounting department had more problems than we did.

Note: Here's a sub-peeve. When a sentence construction begins with If, you don't need a then. Then is implicit, so it's superfluous and wordy:

No: If you can't get Windows to boot, then you'll need to call Ted.

Yes: If you can't get Windows to boot, you'll need to call Ted.

#10: Could of, would of for could have, would have

No: I could of installed that app by mistake.

Yes: I could have installed that app by mistake.

No: I would of sent you a meeting notice, but you were out of town.

Yes: I would have sent you a meeting notice, but you were out of town.
- Doppleganger

People that post crap like this are much more hated than people that have grammar errors.

Along with a lot of other crap.
- Lahey

Topp Engrish studant inn my klass, hasswhole

People that post crap like this are much more hated than people that have grammar errors.
- Lahey

yeah, the truth always hurts, eh?

People that post crap like this are much more hated than people that have grammar errors.
- Lahey

They are far more likely to get called on their grammatical mistakes, in any case. And then to whine about other people calling them out.

Yeah, the truth always hurts, eh?
- Doppleganger

Fixed.

Fixed.
- mfreedman

Knew I would get someone to bite!

They are far more likely to get called on their grammatical mistakes, in any case. And then to whine about other people calling them out.
- Feeling Glucky?

Thomas, gay pride, chicken filla or whatever the (frank) it's called.

Go

I Knew I would get someone to bite!
- Doppleganger

Fixed.

I'm sure you go to ̶ "bars" all the time
- Feeling Glucky?

How did you feel when you made this comment?

Fixed.
- mfreedman

I knew I would get someone to bite, again!!!


BTW why did you capitalize "knew"?

I knew I would get someone to bite, again!!!


BTW why did you capitalize "knew"?
- Doppleganger

He knew that he would get you to bite.

He knew that he would get you to bite.
- Morris

I think you mean he Knew it.

I knew I would get someone to bite, again!!!


BTW why did you capitalize "knew"?
- Doppleganger

I don't really care all that much about grammar in a forum, but I do care when people completely ignore what a person is attempting to get across, just to comment on the fact that they missed an apostrophe.

This discussion isn't meant to be a formal debate, and as long as there is an attempt at clarity, why focus on the unimportant?

Unless of course the speech is something like 'dun fret, imma tak car dis' etc... That I can't stand.

Nice try but you failed starting with "Funny thread of gayness." You have missed the point. This thread isn't about 'gayness', whatever that is..., but about acceptance.

Second, stating "of course, straight people would stop going" is a ridiculous generalization. CFA would be known as the 'gay spot' by people in your world. In mine it would be known as a 'restaurant.' And by the way, certain people may distance themselves but people don't segregate themselves.

Nice try at being funny but I think you were more successful at exposing a degree of intolerance. The words we use are indicative of how we think.
- dawgzhouse

HOMOS LIKE BUTTSEX