Follow me on Twitter Follow @TheJeremyLaura
For all of you who get to see QMJL, OHL, WHL, Development programs and then the choice of North American pro, collegiate or international what path would you take at this point in history? The one hockey playing family in our neighborhood growing up (no program at the schools) had 2 boys. One of them coaches at the “high end… youth levels around Detroit (Little Caesars, Honeybaked, Belle Tire, Honda etc). In the 30+ years I’ve known him, it’s always been the college route as the recommendation. You can get a relevant degree, forge relationships and continue in some capacity to work in the industry.
The “Q… is having concerns as fewer alumni are being picked in the top draft rounds. If I remember correctly, no one from that league was selected in round 1 this year. Jr. Hockey can see high scoring, but international hockey can pit you against NHL alumni and adult players (but on a wider playing surface). It will be interesting to see if the NCAA’s settlement and potential compensation models will shift the landscape. Those players who couldn’t sign and stay in school may see that option changed. Good for the players, potentially not great for jr leagues.
So, you chime in. If it was you or your progeny (or if you are a coach one of your players) where do your discretions lead to? I still personally favor the college route. You can pick the school that will blend the best personal opportunity with the best available program. You’re not going to get traded to another school, and you have a chance to learn broadcasting, psychology, and something every pro needs. Accounting. As always, thanks to all who stop by, to my friends in Missouri, apparently it was 92 after sundown a couple nights ago. That sounds pretty nasty. Stay cool and safe.