Welcome aboard my friend
- obie

*farts*

Crims wasn't on it. Was you, me, pete, rayven, stee, adam french, luc i think. Can't remember the others
- mr.peanut

DD or Marty, maybe? Cause I don't know that any one these names would have done the picture

Also it probably was pre-blogger Frenchy

Kinda works for me, I get off at 3
- obie

yeah but what time are you done work

*farts*
- mr.peanut

yeah but what time are you done work
- BINGO!

Right after I get off

Only way I see that happening is if they trade him or they absolutely cannot reach a deal because he's asking for too much, in which case they would at least make a qualifying offer...
- jugkope

asking too much?!?

asking too much?!?
- fidopro

If his agent says ''look at his use in the last 3 years yaddi-yadda 20M/4 years'' and MB says ''blah blah 3rd pairing 6M/5 years'' and neither budges.

DD or Marty, maybe? Cause I don't know that any one these names would have done the picture

Also it probably was pre-blogger Frenchy
- jugkope

Those 2 were day time staples. I think big was on the pic too

in other news, heard Martin Mcguire Yesterday saying he would not be surprised if Habs don't even sign Mete for next year.
I find that a bit hard to believe tbh, but not impossible
- fidopro

did he explain the logic behind it, i.e. who's gonna play on D? (because there are so many options it's hard to tell)

Those 2 were day time staples. I think big was on the pic too
- mr.peanut

Oilhab made the pic. He was a known night shift hater

If his agent says ''look at his use in the last 3 years yaddi-yadda 20M/4 years'' and MB says ''blah blah 3rd pairing 6M/5 years'' and neither budges.
- jugkope

he's a #7. I highly doubt MB gives him 5 years

did he explain the logic behind it, i.e. who's gonna play on D? (because there are so many options it's hard to tell)
- Pat1993

yeah, he said he and Ouellet are both AHLers. can't say I disagree

Those 2 were day time staples. I think big was on the pic too
- mr.peanut

Makes sense yeah.

Everything changed so much since

he's a #7. I highly doubt MB gives him 5 years
- fidopro

It's what he gave to Alzner....you know he likes his depth.

And Mete is fine as a #4 or 5

It's what he gave to Alzner....you know he likes his depth.

And Mete is fine as a #4 or 5
- jugkope

oh! on a team missing the playoffs sure.
on a winning team he's a #7.

Chiarot is in front of him, so is Kulak. and we can expect Romanov will pass him the minute he jumps on the ice.

in other news, heard Martin Mcguire Yesterday saying he would not be surprised if Habs don't even sign Mete for next year.
I find that a bit hard to believe tbh, but not impossible
- fidopro

Expect the unexpected

Love: MB

oh! on a team missing the playoffs sure.
on a winning team he's a #7.

Chiarot is in front of him, so is Kulak. and we can expect Romanov will pass him the minute he jumps on the ice.
- fidopro

If Yannick Weber went to the Cup finals as a #5-6 there is no justification to put Mete as a #7 on a ''winning'' team.

If Yannick Weber went to the Cup finals as a #5-6 there is no justification to put Mete as a #7 on a ''winning'' team.
- jugkope

yeah, Osgood won the cup too. I guess we don't need Carey

yeah, he said he and Ouellet are both AHLers. can't say I disagree
- fidopro

pretty sure Mete has enough skill to hang around in the NHL, obviously not in your top 4 if you want a winning team..

yeah, Osgood won the cup too. I guess we don't need Carey
- fidopro

That Nashville team was basically what Montreal has been trying to achieve for over a decade....60 points defensively responsible forwards, decent defensive core, strong goalie. Looks legitimate to say, if they made it that far with Y. Weber as their #5 or 6, then it's possible to win with Mete as your 5

If his agent says ''look at his use in the last 3 years yaddi-yadda 20M/4 years'' and MB says ''blah blah 3rd pairing 6M/5 years'' and neither budges.
- jugkope

Wow! Then I guess that’s buh-bye Mete. Jesus.

He’s really not that good. First pass sure....other than that....uhhhh

EDIT: And some speed

That Nashville team was basically what Montreal has been trying to achieve for over a decade....60 points defensively responsible forwards, decent defensive core, strong goalie. Looks legitimate to say, if they made it that far with Y. Weber as their #5 or 6, then it's possible to win with Mete as your 5
- jugkope

that Nashville team had a the best top4 in the league. can you say the same for MTL???

Wow! Then I guess that’s buh-bye Mete. Jesus.

He’s really not that good. First pass sure....other than that....uhhhh

EDIT: And some speed
- Snots33_77

I was just making it extreme to prove a point.

that Nashville team had a the best top4 in the league. can you say the same for MTL???
- fidopro

Oh, for sure not, but it's what MB has been trying to do, hence the Alzner and Chariot signings...Obviously, one was a major failure. Still, since that seems to be his plan (insofar as we think MB is planning anything and not trading around like an headless poulet), it does show that it's not detrimental to have Mete at 5.
Edit: And now sleep.

pretty sure Mete has enough skill to hang around in the NHL, obviously not in your top 4 if you want a winning team..
- Pat1993

doesn't bring offense, doesn't hit, obviously doesn"t fight, not big enough to play againts guys like Malkin... I mean, I like the kid, good little player, but simply not good enough.

Habs have probably the worst group of LDs in the league. and yet he is behind Chiarot Kulak and Romanov. if that's good enough to be a #4... I'm missing sometihng