Eklund: The One Change in the New CBA Hockeybuzz Fans will LOVE. Buzz@2

FIRST!!!!

NOT FIRST!!! IN YER FACE!!!

NOT FIRST!!! IN YER FACE!!!
- fatty_mcmanboobs

But you are first, first place loser.

I’m not really sure that giving players more power to veto trades will cause there to be more. The odds of a player nixing a deal to a team that they want to go to out of fear that that team would trade them seem slim. Maybe if a contenders window is closing and there on a deal with a lot of term left, but even then I’d be surprised.

Will there be a Jets blog again when games start?


Someone do a story on O’Toole.


Thanks

I’m not really sure that giving players more power to veto trades will cause there to be more. The odds of a player nixing a deal to a team that they want to go to out of fear that that team would trade them seem slim. Maybe if a contenders window is closing and there on a deal with a lot of term left, but even then I’d be surprised.
- RedC21

Yup. The exact reason he gave for a player being more willing to accept a trade is going to make teams less willing to trade for him. Once they have him, they are stuck with him forever if he doesn't want to leave.

Oh i just LOVE it!!!!

"No Movement Clauses and No Trade Clauses used to possibly die once a player once agreed to waive the clause and move on....unless the team getting the player agreed to keeping that aspect..."

What an abortion of a paragraph. I cant believe this man writes for a living.