|
|
BFD if they sign him - VanHockeyGuy
Yup won't cry either way. |
|
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: I’m a dose of reality in this cesspool of glee Joined: 10.22.2011
|
|
|
I think it will be somewhat of an upgrade . More importantly so does Benning otherwise there would be no interest .
Give me Simmonds over Schaller, sorry. - VANTEL
I agree with you. Even if Simmonds is acquired it’s short term for the playoff push. I’m ok with it as long as the cost is negligible. |
|
|
|
I agree with you. Even if Simmonds is acquired it’s short term for the playoff push. I’m ok with it as long as the cost is negligible. - bloatedmosquito
He get 5 mil . Ferlands 3.5 would leave it at 1.5 per year pro rated for 6 weeks of regular salary would be 300 k of actual cost to Aquilini (Who cares) .They send back a contract to fit the cap and a low end pick maybe a fourth.
It really is no big deal. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
He get 5 mil . Ferlands 3.5 would leave it at 1.5 per year pro rated for 6 weeks of regular salary would be 300 k of actual cost to Aquilini (Who cares) .They send back a contract to fit the cap and a low end pick maybe a fourth.
It really is no big deal. - VANTEL
Give it time lol |
|
|
|
Give it time lol - LordHumungous
Is it worse than Schaller? |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Is it worse than Schaller? - VANTEL
No I'm just saying posters around here will make acquiring Simmonds a big deal.
I'm all for it if the cost is low.
With Ferland out and a few other injuries some forward depth with toughness would be nice IMO. |
|
|
|
Today is the magical day we finally get an end to Boeser for Dumba as brock will be traded by noon for the chosen one.... |
|
|
|
No I'm just saying posters around here will make acquiring Simmonds a big deal.
I'm all for it if the cost is low.
With Ferland out and a few other injuries some forward depth with toughness would be nice IMO. - LordHumungous
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
No I'm just saying posters around here will make acquiring Simmonds a big deal.
I'm all for it if the cost is low.
With Ferland out and a few other injuries some forward depth with toughness would be nice IMO. - LordHumungous
Why spend assets when the team isn't going to win the cup?
----------------------------
/Cam Robinson/
@Hockey_Robinson
Quit telling people how to be a fan. There is no exact roadmap that needs to be followed.
Kick back and enjoy the distraction of sport anyway you please and let others do the same.
Also, drink more water and wash your hands regularly.
----------------------
Cam laying down the law. |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
Today is the magical day we finally get an end to Boeser for Dumba as brock will be traded by noon for the chosen one.... - Jkuzzi
Josh Manson and Max Jones would be preferable. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
Why spend assets when the team isn't going to win the cup?
----------------------------
/Cam Robinson/
@Hockey_Robinson
Quit telling people how to be a fan. There is no exact roadmap that needs to be followed.
Kick back and enjoy the distraction of sport anyway you please and let others do the same.
Also, drink more water and wash your hands regularly.
----------------------
Cam laying down the law. - manvanfan
I doubt we'd be spending big 'assets' to acquire a guy like Simmonds for a few months lol
|
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
I doubt we'd be spending big 'assets' to acquire a guy like Simmonds for a few months lol - LordHumungous
I think his previous failure in Nashville gave him sort of a Vanek type value. Motte and Jussi is about right for value. |
|
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Linden4Ever, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
I think his previous failure in Nashville gave him sort of a Vanek type value. Motte and Jussi is about right for value. - manvanfan
Garbage in garbage out... |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Is it worse than Schaller? - VANTEL
I mean no big deal if he was, but yes, he could be. |
|
|
|
I mean no big deal if he was, but yes, he could be. - 1970vintage
We could trade for Gaunce he would be cheap
Seriously it doesn't matter who they bring in this fan base will hate him regardless. |
|
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla! Joined: 08.15.2014
|
|
|
We could trade for Gaunce he would be cheap
Seriously it doesn't matter who they bring in this fan base will hate him regardless. - VANTEL
How's he doing on the 4th line in Boston??
Oh wait...
lol |
|
|
|
Garbage in garbage out... - Pacificgem
You wanted to trade Markstrom 2 weeks ago . Your vote doesn't count anymore |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
We could trade for Gaunce he would be cheap
Seriously it doesn't matter who they bring in this fan base will hate him regardless. - VANTEL
Know what I think? The problem with the 4th line is Beagle. Put Sutter back to C on line 3, give Gaudette Schaller and Bailey on line 4 and I bet they’re better |
|
VanHockeyGuy
|
|
|
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC Joined: 04.26.2012
|
|
|
I think his previous failure in Nashville gave him sort of a Vanek type value. Motte and Jussi is about right for value. - manvanfan
I wouldn't trade Motte for Simmonds |
|
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: New York, NY Joined: 07.11.2015
|
|
|
Know what I think? The problem with the 4th line is Beagle. Put Sutter back to C on line 3, give Gaudette Schaller and Bailey on line 4 and I bet they’re better - 1970vintage
Why not just make Sutter 4C? |
|
|
|
I think his previous failure in Nashville gave him sort of a Vanek type value. Motte and Jussi is about right for value. - manvanfan
So, Schaller and Sautner. Sure |
|
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: Linden4Ever, BC Joined: 07.01.2007
|
|
|
You wanted to trade Markstrom 2 weeks ago . Your vote doesn't count anymore - VANTEL
I still wanna trade him, he’ll want term, something Benning should stay clear of. He’s propping up a mediocre team, like Miller and Lack did in 2015, trade him at the TDL or at the draft. |
|
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken |
|
|
Location: BC Joined: 11.11.2010
|
|
|
Why not just make Sutter 4C? - NewYorkNuck
Seniority
And, if the goal is to prop up Schaller, I think Gaudette would do a better job |
|
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks |
|
|
Location: MB Joined: 01.21.2012
|
|
|
So, Schaller and Sautner. Sure - Reubenkincade
I'd think you'd have to do a little better than that. Maybe Utunen instead of Sautner |
|
|
|
I'd think you'd have to do a little better than that. Maybe Utunen instead of Sautner - manvanfan
Rather keep Utunen |
|