Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Carol Schram: Jacob Markstrom leads Canucks with shutout win on Sedin celebration night
Author Message
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 15 @ 10:08 AM ET
BFD if they sign him
- VanHockeyGuy


Yup won't cry either way.
bloatedmosquito
Vancouver Canucks
Location: I’m a dose of reality in this cesspool of glee
Joined: 10.22.2011

Feb 15 @ 10:11 AM ET
I think it will be somewhat of an upgrade . More importantly so does Benning otherwise there would be no interest .

Give me Simmonds over Schaller, sorry.

- VANTEL


I agree with you. Even if Simmonds is acquired it’s short term for the playoff push. I’m ok with it as long as the cost is negligible.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 15 @ 10:19 AM ET
I agree with you. Even if Simmonds is acquired it’s short term for the playoff push. I’m ok with it as long as the cost is negligible.
- bloatedmosquito


He get 5 mil . Ferlands 3.5 would leave it at 1.5 per year pro rated for 6 weeks of regular salary would be 300 k of actual cost to Aquilini (Who cares) .They send back a contract to fit the cap and a low end pick maybe a fourth.

It really is no big deal.
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Feb 15 @ 10:59 AM ET
He get 5 mil . Ferlands 3.5 would leave it at 1.5 per year pro rated for 6 weeks of regular salary would be 300 k of actual cost to Aquilini (Who cares) .They send back a contract to fit the cap and a low end pick maybe a fourth.

It really is no big deal.

- VANTEL

Give it time lol
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 15 @ 11:02 AM ET
Give it time lol
- LordHumungous



Is it worse than Schaller?
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Feb 15 @ 11:05 AM ET
Is it worse than Schaller?
- VANTEL

No I'm just saying posters around here will make acquiring Simmonds a big deal.

I'm all for it if the cost is low.

With Ferland out and a few other injuries some forward depth with toughness would be nice IMO.
Jkuzzi
Joined: 12.14.2016

Feb 15 @ 11:09 AM ET
Today is the magical day we finally get an end to Boeser for Dumba as brock will be traded by noon for the chosen one....
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 15 @ 11:10 AM ET
No I'm just saying posters around here will make acquiring Simmonds a big deal.

I'm all for it if the cost is low.

With Ferland out and a few other injuries some forward depth with toughness would be nice IMO.

- LordHumungous

manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Feb 15 @ 11:11 AM ET
No I'm just saying posters around here will make acquiring Simmonds a big deal.

I'm all for it if the cost is low.

With Ferland out and a few other injuries some forward depth with toughness would be nice IMO.

- LordHumungous

Why spend assets when the team isn't going to win the cup?
----------------------------

/Cam Robinson/
@Hockey_Robinson
Quit telling people how to be a fan. There is no exact roadmap that needs to be followed.

Kick back and enjoy the distraction of sport anyway you please and let others do the same.

Also, drink more water and wash your hands regularly.

----------------------
Cam laying down the law.
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Feb 15 @ 11:13 AM ET
Today is the magical day we finally get an end to Boeser for Dumba as brock will be traded by noon for the chosen one....
- Jkuzzi

Josh Manson and Max Jones would be preferable.
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Feb 15 @ 11:18 AM ET
Why spend assets when the team isn't going to win the cup?
----------------------------

/Cam Robinson/
@Hockey_Robinson
Quit telling people how to be a fan. There is no exact roadmap that needs to be followed.

Kick back and enjoy the distraction of sport anyway you please and let others do the same.

Also, drink more water and wash your hands regularly.

----------------------
Cam laying down the law.

- manvanfan


I doubt we'd be spending big 'assets' to acquire a guy like Simmonds for a few months lol
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Feb 15 @ 11:36 AM ET
I doubt we'd be spending big 'assets' to acquire a guy like Simmonds for a few months lol
- LordHumungous

I think his previous failure in Nashville gave him sort of a Vanek type value. Motte and Jussi is about right for value.
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Linden4Ever, BC
Joined: 07.01.2007

Feb 15 @ 11:48 AM ET
I think his previous failure in Nashville gave him sort of a Vanek type value. Motte and Jussi is about right for value.
- manvanfan

Garbage in garbage out...
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 15 @ 11:48 AM ET
Is it worse than Schaller?
- VANTEL


I mean no big deal if he was, but yes, he could be.
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 15 @ 11:55 AM ET
I mean no big deal if he was, but yes, he could be.
- 1970vintage



We could trade for Gaunce he would be cheap

Seriously it doesn't matter who they bring in this fan base will hate him regardless.
LordHumungous
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Greetings from the Humungous. Ayatollah of rock and rolla!
Joined: 08.15.2014

Feb 15 @ 11:56 AM ET
We could trade for Gaunce he would be cheap

Seriously it doesn't matter who they bring in this fan base will hate him regardless.

- VANTEL



How's he doing on the 4th line in Boston??

Oh wait...

lol
VANTEL
Joined: 07.03.2010

Feb 15 @ 12:02 PM ET
Garbage in garbage out...
- Pacificgem



You wanted to trade Markstrom 2 weeks ago . Your vote doesn't count anymore
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 15 @ 12:04 PM ET
We could trade for Gaunce he would be cheap

Seriously it doesn't matter who they bring in this fan base will hate him regardless.

- VANTEL


Know what I think? The problem with the 4th line is Beagle. Put Sutter back to C on line 3, give Gaudette Schaller and Bailey on line 4 and I bet they’re better
VanHockeyGuy
Location: “Who are we to think we’re anybody?” - Tocchet. Penticton, BC
Joined: 04.26.2012

Feb 15 @ 12:06 PM ET
I think his previous failure in Nashville gave him sort of a Vanek type value. Motte and Jussi is about right for value.
- manvanfan


I wouldn't trade Motte for Simmonds
NewYorkNuck
Vancouver Canucks
Location: New York, NY
Joined: 07.11.2015

Feb 15 @ 12:08 PM ET
Know what I think? The problem with the 4th line is Beagle. Put Sutter back to C on line 3, give Gaudette Schaller and Bailey on line 4 and I bet they’re better
- 1970vintage


Why not just make Sutter 4C?
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Feb 15 @ 12:08 PM ET
I think his previous failure in Nashville gave him sort of a Vanek type value. Motte and Jussi is about right for value.
- manvanfan


So, Schaller and Sautner. Sure
Pacificgem
Vancouver Canucks
Location: Linden4Ever, BC
Joined: 07.01.2007

Feb 15 @ 12:08 PM ET
You wanted to trade Markstrom 2 weeks ago . Your vote doesn't count anymore
- VANTEL

I still wanna trade him, he’ll want term, something Benning should stay clear of. He’s propping up a mediocre team, like Miller and Lack did in 2015, trade him at the TDL or at the draft.
1970vintage
Seattle Kraken
Location: BC
Joined: 11.11.2010

Feb 15 @ 12:10 PM ET
Why not just make Sutter 4C?
- NewYorkNuck


Seniority

And, if the goal is to prop up Schaller, I think Gaudette would do a better job
manvanfan
Vancouver Canucks
Location: MB
Joined: 01.21.2012

Feb 15 @ 12:11 PM ET
So, Schaller and Sautner. Sure
- Reubenkincade

I'd think you'd have to do a little better than that. Maybe Utunen instead of Sautner
Reubenkincade
Location: BC
Joined: 11.18.2016

Feb 15 @ 12:13 PM ET
I'd think you'd have to do a little better than that. Maybe Utunen instead of Sautner
- manvanfan


Rather keep Utunen
Page: Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21  Next