Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 
Forums :: Blog World :: Ty Anderson: Marleau, Tuukka, and paying it forward
Author Message
Ty Anderson
Editor
Location: @_TyAnderson, MA
Joined: 02.21.2008

Oct 10 @ 3:49 AM ET
Ty Anderson: Marleau, Tuukka, and paying it forward
legendguy
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: sault ste marie, ON
Joined: 01.30.2013

Oct 10 @ 2:19 PM ET
Kerfoot is still the leafs third line centre, just in case you forgot. Spezza playing on the 4th line
PrinceChill
Buffalo Sabres
Joined: 10.06.2014

Oct 10 @ 3:25 PM ET
‘Sup, Dril?
Waterwork
San Jose Sharks
Joined: 12.31.2015

Oct 11 @ 6:39 PM ET
I don't know if anyone thinks "Marleau is the answer to their problems ". Probably a lot of people thinking "Marleau for $700K? Hell yeah."
Njuice
Toronto Maple Leafs
Location: ON
Joined: 06.21.2013

Oct 14 @ 9:53 PM ET
I don[t think the Rask trade played out that way at all. Pogge won gold that year...but Rask won silver, rask won best goalie and i believe rask was the mvp of the entire tournament...from a losing team.

I think Toronto wanted to offer pogge, boston held their ground asking for rask. rookie gm in toronto gave in.

at the time it was extremely obvious to everyone that rask was the better goalie. even a plug like jf jr would've known it
Burnt_juice
Joined: 07.22.2018

Oct 14 @ 11:50 PM ET
I get controversial writing to drum up comments from readers such as myself. But your take on Marleau is a little... wrong? Marleau isn’t a stud, so we won’t go there and pretend he’s going to be a 70 point player. But for 700k, SJ can’t lose on this signing. A down year like last year, still fine for 700k. Injury riddled season? Possible, but Marleau’s picture is beside “durability” in the dictionary. He doesn’t miss games, unless he breaks a hip this season.

Toronto had to move him for cap reasons, to overpay Marner. I’ve been told by sources better than any that Eklund has that Carolina got a first rounder as part of that deal because they agreed to buy him out. The return was less for a team unwilling to agree to buy him out, which would have allowed the acquiring team the flip him again at the deadline (or sooner) for additional assets.