It’s all due to the history of the coach. Lmao. Dots are easy to connect.
- Peter Richards

they still make dots candy?

they still make dots candy?
- hello it's me 2050

yes, and candy buttons too

It’s all due to the history of the coach. Lmao. Dots are easy to connect.
- Peter Richards

Couldn’t be more clear

Michkov got 18 minutes of ice time and 2 assists, in Sochi's 5-4 OT win.

Couldn’t be more clear
- ClaudeFather

yeah, didn't think it was difficult.

TK was not at STM Meet the Team Event... is he not yet in area?
- ForeverFlyer16

Got my answer:
Team. Kimelman on X reported that TK is now in camp after attending the NHL player media tour in Las Vegas, earlier this week... so, he was not in the area for the meet the team.

It’s all due to the history of the coach. Lmao. Dots are easy to connect.
- Peter Richards

LMAO. The Commodore situation in Toronto has relevance. How Babcock did overall in Toronto as a coach, is not relevant. Unless you can link that his performance there was due in large part to the Commodore situation. How far back do you want to go with Babcock? How about his Detroit and Anaheim days? He also coached two college teams. Two WHL teams and an AHL team. Should we bring up how he did there also? Dots are easy to connect. LOL

yes, and candy buttons too
- Peter Richards

lol

LMAO. The Commodore situation in Toronto has relevance. How Babcock did overall in Toronto as a coach, is not relevant. Unless you can link that his performance there was due in large part to the Commodore situation. How far back do you want to go with Babcock? How about his Detroit and Anaheim days? He also coached two college teams. Two WHL teams and an AHL team. Should we bring up how he did there also? Dots are easy to connect. LOL
- MJL

commodore situation was not in Toronto. most of the stuff about player treatment didn't come out until he was in Toronto. your the only one talking about how he did overall. but keep trying.

LMAO. The Commodore situation in Toronto has relevance. How Babcock did overall in Toronto as a coach, is not relevant. Unless you can link that his performance there was due in large part to the Commodore situation. How far back do you want to go with Babcock? How about his Detroit and Anaheim days? He also coached two college teams. Two WHL teams and an AHL team. Should we bring up how he did there also? Dots are easy to connect. LOL
- MJL

Babcock tried to turn the team against a very young Mitch Marner with manipulation in Toronto. The Commodore situation I believe started with the Ducks and continued in Detroit.

Got my answer:
Team. Kimelman on X reported that TK is now in camp after attending the NHL player media tour in Las Vegas, earlier this week... so, he was not in the area for the meet the team.
- ForeverFlyer16

he was here last week hitting dingers

https://www.flyersinsider...ed-to-Make-The-MLB-274171

commodore situation was not in Toronto. most of the stuff about player treatment didn't come out until he was in Toronto. your the only one talking about how he did overall. but keep trying.

- Peter Richards

Actually I'm not but keep trying. My opinion is how he did in Toronto or with any other team has no relevance. Apparently, you can't read. Your comment did not make sense. End of story.

Actually I'm not but keep trying. My opinion is how he did in Toronto or with any other team has no relevance. Apparently, you can't read. Your comment did not make sense. End of story.
- MJL

repeating the same thing back.... your opinion has nothing to do with what was being discussed. wasn't about coaching but the player treatment.
and right on cue the petty insults start. others followed along just fine. keep trolling

not sure what his end game is on that request.
- hello it's me 2050

I dont think Babcock has any idea how to interact with people on a human level. In his twisted mind this must be one of the ways he came up with.

Why are NHL teams so predictably stuck in the past by recycling the likes of Babcock, Boudreau, Bowness, De Boer, McLellan, Tocchet and Torts?

repeating the same thing back.... your opinion has nothing to do with what was being discussed. wasn't about coaching but the player treatment.
and right on cue the petty insults start. others followed along just fine. keep trolling
- Peter Richards

I'll repeat, my opinion is that it had nothing to do with his coaching on past teams. Which is why I said your question of "how did he do in Toronto" was irrelevant. Like I said, you're having difficulty reading. Your post above claiming my opinion was completely opposite of what it actually is, is the proof of that. That's not a petty insult, it's just a fact.

Why are NHL teams so predictably stuck in the past by recycling the likes of Babcock, Boudreau, Bowness, De Boer, McLellan, Tocchet and Torts?
- Minnyhock

Good question. Maybe it's due to one of the biggest issues with the Flyers. Most teams aren't good at developing coaches and bringing them up through the ranks.

I'll repeat, my opinion is that it had nothing to do with his coaching on past teams. Which is why I said your question of "how did he do in Toronto" was irrelevant. Like I said, you're having difficulty reading. Your post above claiming my opinion was completely opposite of what it actually is, is the proof of that. That's not a petty insult, it's just a fact.
- MJL

the only thing you deal with. my man

I'll repeat, my opinion is that it had nothing to do with his coaching on past teams. Which is why I said your question of "how did he do in Toronto" was irrelevant. Like I said, you're having difficulty reading. Your post above claiming my opinion was completely opposite of what it actually is, is the proof of that. That's not a petty insult, it's just a fact.
- MJL

twist away.

deal with facts. when did i say it was opposite? when did commodore play for toronto? hilarious

twist away.

deal with facts. when did i say it was opposite? when did commodore play for toronto? hilarious
- Peter Richards

Above at 2:10, less than an hour before you made this post when you replied to me that it wasn't about coaching. Which was my exact point in reply to you. That it has nothing to do with his coaching results in Toronto.

Above at 2:10, less than an hour before you made this post when you replied to me that it wasn't about coaching. Which was my exact point in reply to you. That it has nothing to do with his coaching results in Toronto.
- MJL

never said it did, you were the one that brought up the coaching results. what a reach of desperation. keep twisting

LMAO. The Commodore situation in Toronto has relevance. How Babcock did overall in Toronto as a coach, is not relevant. Unless you can link that his performance there was due in large part to the Commodore situation. How far back do you want to go with Babcock? How about his Detroit and Anaheim days? He also coached two college teams. Two WHL teams and an AHL team. Should we bring up how he did there also? Dots are easy to connect. LOL
- MJL

never said it did, you were the one that brought up the coaching results. what a reach of desperation. keep twisting
- Peter Richards

You're claiming that the below post you made, was not about coaching results? I'm twisting that? Okay LOL

This post below was made by you at 11:23 AM yesterday. The post you're claiming I made bringing up coaching results was made yesterday at 1:10 PM. Yet you claim I brought that up first.

https://www.hockeybuzz.co...p?thread_id=184944&page=4

"how did Babcock do with the toronto club?"

You're claiming that the below post you made, was not about coaching results? I'm twisting that? Okay LOL

This post below was made by you at 11:23 AM yesterday. The post you're claiming I made bringing up coaching results was made yesterday at 1:10 PM. Yet you claim I brought that up first.

https://www.hockeybuzz.co...p?thread_id=184944&page=4

"how did Babcock do with the toronto club?"
- MJL

no it was not and was explained. was in regards to player treatment. many others understood. It's quite obvious what you are trying to do and laughable

no it was not and was explained. was in regards to player treatment. many others understood. It's quite obvious what you are trying to do and laughable
- Peter Richards

Any normal person would take that to be looking at coaching results. Many others understood? There was one guy and he just took side of favorites. Rather than judging independently. It's quite obvious you misspoke if one was to take you as genuine. It's quite obvious what you are trying to do and it's laughable. You were wrong. End of story. Moving on.