that wouldn't be a bad choice. not sure murray wants to get on the merry-go-round again though. i highly doubt he'll get another shot as nhl head coach and he might just prefer to stay put with the phantoms. - hammarby31
I believe Bill has mention once or twice that Murray really has enjoyed his time coaching the Phantoms, but would like to get back into the NHL. I doubt he'll ever see a head coaching job again, so helping Hakstol learn the ropes may be the perfect position for him. Plus he is a very solid developmental himself.
To me I just see this an another step in Hextall's plan of developing through the draft. Even if the Flyers landed Babcock, they are a still only playoff bubble team at best.
Location: it's been 84 years, AZ Joined: 01.02.2007
May 18 @ 11:38 AM ET
I believe Bill has mention once or twice that Murray really has enjoyed his time coaching the Phantoms, but would like to get back into the NHL. I doubt he'll ever see a head coaching job again, so helping Hakstol learn the ropes may be the perfect position for him. Plus he is a very solid developmental himself.
To me I just see this an another step in Hextall's plan of developing through the draft. Even if the Flyers landed Babcock, they are a still only playoff bubble team at best. - mmcclatchy
i'm not enamored with babcock and couldn't give a (frank) that he's not here. in fact, i'm glad he's not because it would just ratchet up the pressure on a team that's not ready to contend. it's going to take a few years regardless of who's running the bench.
Location: IT'S GRITTIN TIME, CA Joined: 07.14.2007
May 18 @ 11:40 AM ET
Funny how people who seem to be on board with this hire, never mentioned Hakstol in any of their posts prior. Interesting, very interesting. - PLindbergh31
i'd be interested to hear your 10 page write up as to why this is a bad hire
Location: A medical emergency involving you. Joined: 08.05.2013
May 18 @ 11:41 AM ET
Funny how people who seem to be on board with this hire, never mentioned Hakstol in any of their posts prior. Interesting, very interesting. - PLindbergh31
i demand that all posters on an internet forum please stay up to date with all coaches on every level of hockey at all times. anyone who isn't has egg on their face.
Location: it's been 84 years, AZ Joined: 01.02.2007
May 18 @ 11:41 AM ET
Funny how people who seem to be on board with this hire, never mentioned Hakstol in any of their posts prior. Interesting, very interesting. - PLindbergh31
does it matter if any of us are on board or not?
let me ask you this...if the flyers had hired dave poulin, former long time UND coach with no nhl coaching experience, would you be on board?
Location: it's been 84 years, AZ Joined: 01.02.2007
May 18 @ 11:42 AM ET
i demand that all posters on an internet forum please stay up to date with all coaches on every level of hockey at all times. anyone who isn't has egg on their face. - -davies-
Location: it's disgusting how good you are at hockeybuzz. Joined: 09.20.2013
May 18 @ 11:43 AM ET
Funny how people who seem to be on board with this hire, never mentioned Hakstol in any of their posts prior. Interesting, very interesting. - PLindbergh31
I actually mentioned his name in one of the blogs a few weeks ago