Wanna blog? Start your own hockey blog with My HockeyBuzz. Register for free today!
 

More trade deadline talk

February 11, 2019, 1:28 PM ET [96 Comments]
Todd Cordell
Calgary Flames Blogger • RSSArchiveCONTACT
Follow me on Twitter @ToddCordell

We know the Calgary Flames will be active leading up to, and at, the trade deadline.

What we don't know is to what extent GM Brad Treliving will add to a team that already looks like a Stanley Cup contender.

In Pierre LeBrun's trade deadline breakdown at The Athletic, which I recommend reading in full, he listed the Flames as one of nine "buyers" and shed some light on how they could approach the deadline.

Excerpt below:

Calgary Flames: No question GM Brad Treliving has done his homework and phoned around on a long list of potentially available players. The Flames, I’m told, are still in the mode of sizing up the market. I think depending on the cost, the Flames could add a top-nine forward and also a third-pair defenceman. I’ve always liked the idea of Micheal Ferland returning to Calgary but I think once the Flames found out a few weeks ago from Carolina a first-round pick was part of the ask, that was a pass until further notice. The Flames don’t have their second-round pick for June so while I wouldn’t say their first-round pick is off the table, the Flames certainly aren’t going out of their way to flaunt it. Now if it could get them Stone, well, that’s a different story. On a more medium scale, two rentals I think Calgary should look at: Gustav Nyquist in Detroit or Marcus Johansson in New Jersey. Both pending UFAs would add more versatility and scoring depth to the Flames’ lineup.


There's a lot to get to, so I'm going to break things down point by point:

• The opener is nothing new nor surprising. James Neal still hasn't found his touch, Michael Frolik, for whatever reason, is not a Bill Peters favorite, and Sam Bennett is pretty inconsistent offensively. It makes sense for them to seek a little more pop, even if only as injury protection.

• For months its been rumored the Flames want to add a 3rd pairing defenseman. I don't think it's a glaring need, especially once Juuso Valimaki returns, but if they want a veteran who is a little more stable, there are plenty of options out there. The key is targeting under-the-radar guys (Freddy Claesson, Ben Lovejoy) as opposed to the bigger-named bruisers teams always overpay for (Erik Gudbranson, Adam McQuaid).

• I do really like Ferland and the Flames know he can have success in their system/alongside the players they have. In saying that, I doubt Peters wants to break up the top line and I don't see Ferland being used in a shutdown role with Matthew Tkachuk and Mikael Backlund. That means he'd probably slot in on the 3rd line. As much as I like Ferland, he is more of a complementary scorer than a facilitator. I can't fault Treliving if he doesn't want to trade a 1st for a guy who likely would be used in a 3rd line role where he'd have to create for himself.

• Over the last two years, the Flames have made one pick inside the first three rounds of the draft. They're already without a 2nd and 6th this season. It makes sense that if they are going to part with their 1st, they want a big piece. The Flames would certainly have to add to a 1st to get Stone – you'd be throwing Valimaki, Rasmus Andersson, or Oliver Kylington on top at the least – but that's the kind of guy worth paying for. If you put Stone, who should probably be a Selke finalist, opposite side of Matthew Tkachuk on the 2nd line, you might be looking at the best top-6 in the league.

• If the Flames don't wish to go big-game hunting, I think LeBrun's suggestions in the mid-range are very nice alternatives. Gustav Nyquist has already surpassed the 40-point plateau for the sixth year in a row and he ranks 3rd among Detroit forwards with a 52.65 CF%. He is very good and a legit top-6 guy.

• Marcus Johansson's counting totals are down a little, however, he is still producing at a 40+ point pace and he is piling up 5v5 shots and chances at the highest clip of his career. Through ~15 tracked games, Johansson ranks 2nd only to Taylor Hall on the Devils in 5v5 shot contribution percentage. I think he has played better than the standard numbers suggest and the team that bets on him next will probably be rewarded.

Recent posts:

Goaltending the difference as Sharks top Flames

Are the Flames eyeing Mats Zuccarello?

Four depth defenders the Flames could target at the deadline

Hotstove: Western Conference bounce-back player of the year?

Hotstove: midseason Norris Trophy picks

Hotstove: midseason Hart Trophy picks

Predicting the Pacific Division standings
Join the Discussion: » 96 Comments » Post New Comment
More from Todd Cordell
» Three negatives from the Calgary Flames' 2020-21 campaign
» Three positives from the Calgary Flames' 2020-21 season
» Calgary Flames notes - May 19th
» Three things I'd like to see from the Calgary Flames down the stretch
» G52 Calgary Flames vs Ottawa Senators: Low-danger hockey