Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
I have no doubt that all picks will basically be 1st rounders this year
#CollbergFever - dt99999
Yessssssss |
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: You are all perennial cynical sissies , ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
I have no doubt that all picks will basically be 1st rounders this year
#CollbergFever - dt99999
#ThrowerAllStar |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
#ThrowerAllStar - Symba007
Collberg had not 2, not 3, but 4 goals last season with the Rogle BK. Not to mention his 5 assists!
On behalf of the Montreal Canadiens, you're welcome, Sweden. |
|
obie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Oshawa, ON Joined: 09.17.2005
|
|
|
oh please Montreal go after Lucic.
- bluestar
They would be trading for the 10th pick more than Lucic |
|
Adam French
Atlanta Thrashers |
|
|
Location: Isn't Cooley 5"11? You know who else is 5"11? Sydney Crosby. - Scabeh Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
I have no doubt that all picks will basically be 1st rounders this year
#CollbergFever - dt99999
|
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: You are all perennial cynical sissies , ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
- AdamFrench
#yourboy |
|
Not_Yan
St Louis Blues |
|
|
Location: it's an excellent product, easier, quicker, and even better than real mashed potatoes. Joined: 04.19.2013
|
|
|
If this is what it takes to completely destroy this team for a few years more,
sure why not |
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: You are all perennial cynical sissies , ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
If this is what it takes to completely destroy this team for a few years more,
sure why not - Not_Yan
Just a brilliant idea from Matthias Brunet...nothing behind it |
|
|
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: You are all perennial cynical sissies , ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
DT...it's a sign something big is coming up...the end is near
Canadiens MontréalVerified account @CanadiensMTL · 48s49 seconds ago
Le code Club 1909 du jour. / Today's Club 1909 code.
BRISEBOIS
|
|
DoubleDown
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Not to point any fingers but Tyson Barrie has looked awful in the blue and white for the Leafs., QC Joined: 07.28.2006
|
|
|
I don't hate the basis of the deal, but the execution isn't quite what I'd want. Without some manner of arrangements with Pacioretty about resigning before the trade, the risk of losing Klefbom and the 10th overall pick for Schlemko and a 2nd is a blunder FAR too dear to risk. Unless an extension framework can be discussed and agreed upon prior to the draft then I don't see this working for the Oilers. Once summer rolls around, it could be worth exploring something with a similar framework, though:
Lucic, Klefbom and our 2019 1st
For
Pacioretty and Schlemko - MaximumBone
the Oilers are too much of a wild card for that. that pick could easily end up being in the mid 20s and to trade Pacioretty for such uncertainty is terrible asset management. so Marc Bergevin would probably like your deal. that being said, i am not sure i see Pacioretty committing to a Canadian market long term unless it's Montreal. just seems like a guy who, if he is going to uproot his life/family, he's going to do it in a quieter hockey market. |
|
Adam French
Atlanta Thrashers |
|
|
Location: Isn't Cooley 5"11? You know who else is 5"11? Sydney Crosby. - Scabeh Joined: 04.06.2011
|
|
|
If this is what it takes to completely destroy this team for a few years more,
sure why not - Not_Yan
Pierre was talking about his plan for the Canadiens GM position. So great. You guys would have Cody Ceci on the top pairing. |
|
obie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Oshawa, ON Joined: 09.17.2005
|
|
|
the Oilers are too much of a wild card for that. that pick could easily end up being in the mid 20s and to trade Pacioretty for such uncertainty is terrible asset management. so Marc Bergevin would probably like your deal. that being said, i am not sure i see Pacioretty committing to a Canadian market long term unless it's Montreal. just seems like a guy who, if he is going to uproot his life/family, he's going to do it in a quieter hockey market. - DoubleDown
I agree, if the Habs are taking Lucic it's the 10th overall they're after, anything else and Edmonton can try their luck somewhere else!
|
|
dt99999
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: wow, hope that's sarcasim Joined: 11.18.2008
|
|
|
DT...it's a sign something big is coming up...the end is near
Canadiens MontréalVerified account @CanadiensMTL · 48s49 seconds ago
Le code Club 1909 du jour. / Today's Club 1909 code.
BRISEBOIS
- Symba007
Howard will ban himself. |
|
|
|
If it gets them the 10th pick in the draft they should consider it for sure - obie
Politely, I have to disagree. I mean sure, you should consider anything as a proper manager. That said, Lucic at that price for five more years, all the while watching him become worse and worse isn't even remotely worth the 10th overall pick in my eyes. If they take back Alzner I'd look at it. Straight up Lucic for the 10th? Hard, HARD pass |
|
leafsfann
Toronto Maple Leafs |
|
Location: Phoenix, AZ Joined: 05.11.2014
|
|
|
I have family members who are Oilers fans. I've seen enough of Lucic over the past couple years to come to the educated conclusion that any GM that trades for him takes the torch for worst gm in the league straight from Chia's hand. |
|
Fountain-San
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: Marchand is a rat fink dweeb.., ME Joined: 02.21.2007
|
|
|
i really think they should, yes. |
|
obie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Oshawa, ON Joined: 09.17.2005
|
|
|
Politely, I have to disagree. I mean sure, you should consider anything as a proper manager. That said, Lucic at that price for five more years, all the while watching him become worse and worse isn't even remotely worth the 10th overall pick in my eyes. If they take back Alzner I'd look at it. Straight up Lucic for the 10th? Hard, HARD pass - Takemedrunkimhome
That was my proposal all along, Alzner, Pacioretty & the 56th pick for Lucic and the 10th!
Or some variation of that!
And as far as the 5 years left on Lucic's contract, it becomes very buyout affordable after 3! |
|
Fountain-San
Boston Bruins |
|
|
Location: Marchand is a rat fink dweeb.., ME Joined: 02.21.2007
|
|
|
I have family members who are Oilers fans. I've seen enough of Lucic over the past couple years to come to the educated conclusion that any GM that trades for him takes the torch for worst gm in the league straight from Chia's hand. - leafsfann
that is very "Habsy" |
|
WaterBoy
|
|
|
Location: The opposite of what Pat says, YT Joined: 06.27.2006
|
|
|
i really think they should, yes. - Fountain-San
|
|
deadpoulet
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Montreal Joined: 07.01.2008
|
|
|
I think people did not read the blog.... |
|
obie
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: Oshawa, ON Joined: 09.17.2005
|
|
|
I think people did not read the blog.... - deadpoulet
Seems that way every blog! |
|
Symba007
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: You are all perennial cynical sissies , ON Joined: 02.26.2007
|
|
|
I think people did not read the blog.... - deadpoulet
Blog?
-Pete26 |
|
|
|
That was my proposal all along, Alzner, Pacioretty & the 56th pick for Lucic and the 10th!
Or some variation of that!
And as far as the 5 years left on Lucic's contract, it becomes very buyout affordable after 3! - obie
While slightly more reasonable I feel like that's a waste of Patches unless Klefbom is in there too. Lucic is that bad. Alzner isn't in that same boat. Patches in there and you've not only taken on possibly the ugliest contract in the NHL but also given up your top tradable asset. Again, politely...hard pass |
|
Pat1993
Montreal Canadiens |
|
|
Location: disguise delimit, QC Joined: 08.28.2009
|
|
|
While slightly more reasonable I feel like that's a waste of Patches unless Klefbom is in there too. Lucic is that bad. Alzner isn't in that same boat. Patches in there and you've not only taken on possibly the ugliest contract in the NHL but also given up your top tradable asset. Again, politely...hard pass - Takemedrunkimhome
Could we get the "impolite" version of this reply? |
|